On Zechariah;
Zechariah 12 Fulfilled
DECEMBER 24, 2014ADAM MAARSCHALK27 COMMENTs
This post is in response to recent and past questions about whether or not the prophecies of
Zechariah 12 have been fulfilled. At a later time I may do my own in-depth study of this passage, but this post draws on a few studies done by others who believe that Zechariah 12 was fulfilled in the first century AD. Here are a couple of questions to consider regarding
Zechariah 12-14:
1. Did Zechariah speak of only earthly Jerusalem throughout these three chapters, or did he shift at any time to speaking about the new/heavenly Jerusalem?
2. Did Zechariah possibly have a glimpse of the revelation that Paul had in Galatians 4:21-31, when he spoke of two Jerusalems; one that was in bondage and ready to be cast out, and one that was free and is the mother of God’s people? Isaiah had this revelation to some degree (see Isaiah 65:17 – 66:24).
A. In the first study I’d like to present, Don K. Preston
discusses Zechariah 12 in conjunction with Revelation 1:7, a related passage, and gives some historical and contextual background for Zechariah 12:
It seems to have escaped the notice of those who offer
Revelation 1:7 as proof of a yet future coming of Jesus that this verse is taken directly out of the book of Zechariah; and as we shall see Jesus also uses this verse in the great eschatological discourse of Matthew 24. Surely the Bible student will want to be fully aware of how the verse is used in those contexts.
In
Zechariah 12:10 the Spirit is speaking of a time which he designated as “in that day.” This little term is used extensively by the prophet and is a limiting factor for everything which he discusses. Some of the “in that day” statements are confessedly enigmatic; but enough of them are sufficiently specific as to subject or time that there can be no misunderstanding.
1. “In that day” was to be when God would “break my covenant made with all the people” (Zech. 11:7-11). This is undeniably when the Old Covenant would pass.
2. “In that day” would be “when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and Jerusalem” (12:1).
3. “In that day would be when “there shall be great mourning in Jerusalem” (12:11).
4. “In that day” would be when “there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David…for sin and for uncleanness” (13:1).
5. “In that day” would be when God would “cause the prophets and the unclean spirit to pass out of the land” (13:2).
6. “In that day” would be when the shepherd would be smitten and the sheep scattered (13:6-7).
7. “In that day” would be when only a remnant would be saved (13:8).
8. “In that day” would be when God would “gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle,” (14:2).
9. “In that day” “living waters would go out from Jerusalem” (14:8).
10. “In that day” there would be only one God and one Lord (14:9).
… Is it not patent that all the above… happened in one generation? How then can one divorce the appearance of the Messiah, when they would look on him whom they had pierced, from that same fateful generation?
Interestingly, John the author of Revelation used
Zechariah 12:10 on another occasion. In
John 19:37 as Jesus hung on the cross the Lord’s favorite apostle records the event as fulfillment of Zechariah’s words. This application of a single prediction to two events is not unknown in scripture… For John,
Zechariah 12:10 was applicable to Jesus’ crucifixion; but it would receive final fulfillment when “all the tribes of the earth” would mourn when they looked on him whom they had pierced. To John this would be when Jesus returned in the clouds of glory.