Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So; now you equate yourself to the Great Apostle Paul?Purity said:2 Cor 12:7 ;) (Purity)
Im sorry to disappoint youPurity said:Disappoints me to see a believer quote a verse which claims a truth but they are blinded to see it.
Holy Spirit = Breath Power of Yahweh.
I haven’t said anything to disagree with this, in fact I stated it first, so what point am I missing?Purity said:So again you miss the point of what Christ is teaching - the focus is on how Abraham was able to see Christs day! Not to see Christ literally during his mortal days! Not even seeing one who is invisible but "afar off" - a later manifestation of the Father in a promised Son just likened to his son Isaac.
If Jesus could be seen by Abraham - I mean, actually see him through the eye of faith (by promise) then one can rightly say he pre-existed, not literally speaking, but in faithful vision.
What is Peter teaching us here?Purity said:(Jesus) Who verily was "foreordained" before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, (1 Peter 1:20)
This would make no sense if Jesus pre-existed! No sense at all because we are spoken in the same language in Rom 8.
Sorry Mazda but that is the correct interpretation of the matter - like it or not ;)
Thank you again!justaname said:Old Jack gets a big Christian hug for himself!![]()
John1:1 happens to be1 of about 4 verses in the Bible,that supports your side of the debate.There must be more than 50 verses that say otherwise,which is the reason we can have this debate in the first place.My personal belief is that Jesus was halfman halfGod.I do not agree that he was equal to God the creator.StanJ said:Returning to heaven? Hmmmm, so you think Jesus IS from heaven? So you agree with John 1:1?
I'm afraid a lawyer and a mediator are two different things, and Jesus is the ONLY mediator between God and man. In order for someone to be a mediator, they have to have experience on both sides of the issue, so this just confirms that Jesus in His hypostatic nature, is both God and Man.
He IS our high priest in the Order of Melchizedek.
As Peter said in Acts 10:34, God is NO respecter of persons. No man goes to heaven, sinful or otherwise. Apparently you also did not get the memo about salvation and ETERNAL LIFE.
You're absolutely right....it is about TRUTH and who God really is.
A lot more than 4, but then you have to be able to see that. Sounds like you are willing to throw away these 4 verses rather than find out how they fit with all the other verses you assert support your belief. Jesus was ALL man and ALL God, hence His hypostatic nature. Are you also willing to disregard the following verse? I have many others I can supply you as well that will show God's triune nature.Pelaides said:John1:1 happens to be1 of about 4 verses in the Bible,that supports your side of the debate.There must be more than 50 verses that say otherwise,which is the reason we can have this debate in the first place.My personal belief is that Jesus was halfman halfGod.I do not agree that he was equal to God the creator.
I am use to it ;)Im sorry to disappoint you![]()
Your list was inferring the Holy Spirit (Spirit) was one person of the Trinity when as you have expressed about it is the Power of God.(Job 33:4) “The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life.”
"Spirit" - “ruwach” = wind, breath, mind, Spirit (It is used 378 times in the Old Testament and is translated "spirit" 232 times)
“ breath” - “nĕshamah” = breath, spirit (used 24 x in 24 verses in the following manner: breath (17x), blast (3x), spirit (2x), inspiration (1x), souls (1x).)
The Spirit has been active throughout creation up until this point,
So in light of the observation I made about the Spirits work in creation Just like God and Just like Jesus, what have I said that you have deemed wrong? Or blind as you put it.
Not so - you are correct the Spirit is the Power and Wisdom of God and His alone to give - though now that God (The Father) who has life in himself has given that life to Jesus which is now in himself both Father and Son can give life, power and Spirit.The Bible refers to the Spirit as “The Spirit” when talking about “The Spirit?”
Why not Gods power? Gods force? Gods might? Or even more often as Gods breath?
It is referred to as Gods Spirit however, but that doesn’t work for you because that plays in to the hand of a Trinitarian view.
Absolutely! Scriptures is very clear on this.So the Arians say that the Holy Spirit must be a kind of force, the might of God, his power.
good quote!but Zechariah 4:6 says
“Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts.”
Well your Zech 4:6 quote proved the Spirit is Gods Power and Authority which is greater than the strength of flesh and its political powers.I haven’t said anything to disagree with this, in fact I stated it first, so what point am I missing?
Correction: Angels showed up....But you seem to be adamant that he never saw the lord physically either,
Can you explain to me who Abraham was talking to when the Lord showed up and told him of his plan to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah?
I think you missed a great deal there Mazda.What Lord was he seeing feeding talking too?
What was the whole point of the Lord talking with Abraham about the destruction of Sodom, what event was it to be a picture of? Who does Abraham plead to about Lot and his family?
What is Peter teaching us here?
Christ speaking with Abraham has no bearing in the context of what he is talking about in this teaching purity, there is no need to bring up every time the Lord has appeared throughout human history. We would loose the point of what Peter here is getting at, which is how to live before God our Father.
Blessings :)
That egg gets me every time!Watch out jw's...............don't want to be wearing egg all over your face......get it.......egg......triune :)
Just kiddin...............just me bein my silly self.....
to all the jw's in here.....have a beautiful day.
This will be ignored by P;!StanJ said:A lot more than 4, but then you have to be able to see that. Sounds like you are willing to throw away these 4 verses rather than find out how they fit with all the other verses you assert support your belief. Jesus was ALL man and ALL God, hence His hypostatic nature. Are you also willing to disregard the following verse? I have many others I can supply you as well that will show God's triune nature.
[SIZE=9.5pt]Is 9:6[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.[/SIZE]
lets try this again shall we, I will repeat the post I was replying to and see if it jogs your memory, here it isPurity said:I think you missed a great deal there Mazda.
When a NT Inspired Apostle teaches you that Abraham entertained Angels I suggest you take him at his word. Three angels 1, stayed with Abraham and Sarah while the other two went into Sodom.
To suggest Jesus was there is gross mutilation of the text and the highest form of inference I am yet to witness in this forum to date. Not only are you neglecting Peters letter but you infer a pre-existent Christ when clearly Jesus is a created being.
Like you!
Peace
P.
Purity said:(Jesus) Who verily was "foreordained" before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, (1 Peter 1:20)
This would make no sense if Jesus pre-existed! No sense at all because we are spoken in the same language in Rom 8.
Sorry Mazda but that is the correct interpretation of the matter - like it or not ;)
Ummm ok :blink:Purity said:I think you missed a great deal there Mazda.
When a NT Inspired Apostle teaches you that Abraham entertained Angels I suggest you take him at his word. Three angels 1, stayed with Abraham and Sarah while the other two went into Sodom.
Purity said:To suggest Jesus was there is gross mutilation of the text and the highest form of inference I am yet to witness in this forum to date. Not only are you neglecting Peters letter but you infer a pre-existent Christ when clearly Jesus is a created being.
Like you!
Peace
P.
Wow powerful argument bro!! :huh:Purity said:Correction: Angels showed up....
1. The Zech 4:6 quote does not prove that the Spirit is merely “a power”Purity said:Well your Zech 4:6 quote proved the Spirit is Gods Power and Authority which is greater than the strength of flesh and its political powers.
Purity said:That was the lesson that Zerubbabel, and all saints, must learn. Zerubbabel and his associates faced a "mountain" of opposition in the building of the temple, but this vision revealed that it would be conquered and levelled as a plain, if they drew upon the means that Yahweh was prepared to make available to them. Paul learned the lesson, and taught that he could do "all things through Christ which strengtheneth me" (Php 4:13).
Strength is available for us from the same source, because "the testimony of Jesus" constitutes God's spirit (Joh 6:63; Eph 6:17; John 5:6; Joh 17:17) by which power, the saints have been enabled to conquer (Rev 12:11). In the future, a mountain of Gentile opposition to the establishment of the kingdom of God will arise, to be likewise levelled to a plain by "God's Spirit." All political power is destined to be humbled before the feet of the Lord Jesus and his followers. "But this will not result by the power and strength of Israel under any organisation they might constitute; for at that crisis their power and strength will have been utterly scattered; but it shall be accomplished by Yahweh's Spirit, which will raise Zerubbabel and his companions from among the dead, to be the captains of Israel together with the living believers; and will be the strength and power energising them all to the complete reduction of the Great Political Mountain of the Gentiles to the level of a summer threshing-floor; even to cause to go forth the Head, or Chief Stone, with shouting of 'Grace, grace unto him!'" As the light of the lampstand in the vision of Zechariah destroyed the darkness of the night (Zec 4:2), so will Yahweh's Spirit manifested through His immortalised saints, destroy Gentile darkness at Christ's return (Isa 60:1-2).
Do you know the story ?Purity said:"Not by might"....That is, not by the strength of the flesh.
"Nor by power".... Nor by the influence of authority.
"But by My Spirit...
I didn't think you were, for the very reason you indicated. They pretty much just spout what the WTTS tells them to.Purity said:That egg gets me every time!
Though I am not a JW and I even cringe when they knock - especially the Mormons - had three young men in my room recently discussing the nature of Christ - they didn't have a clue - it's like cloning - should be made illegal.
Unitarian will suffice for now.StanJ said:I didn't think you were, for the very reason you indicated. They pretty much just spout what the WTTS tells them to.
Christadelphian maybe?
1 Peter 1:20 is not difficult to understand Mazda.Madad21 said:1 Peter 1:20
20 He indeed was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you
You argument was that he was not manifest but merely "foreordained" which does nothing to prove your point "but was manifest in these last times for you" saying that this would not make sense if Jesus had shown up.
to which I did a crazy unheard of thing and read the entire passage in its context and realised the subject of this particular discourse by Peter was 'how to live as a Child of God'.
Not a history lesson teaching us how many times Jesus appeared before his birth..![]()
Whoa!!
![]()
![]()
This is exactly what I said :-[background=#fcfcfc]What is Peter teaching us here?[/background]
Thanks for the Arian history lesson purity, I didnt need it.Purity said:Unitarian will suffice for now.
Whatever I am, the Scripture is being held up by the Father as a testimony against Constantine's religion.
P
1 Peter 1:20 is not difficult to understand Mazda.
"Foreordained" is proginosko, signifying "to designate beforehand."
From the very beginning, God purposed or designed to provide such a "lamb" (Rev 13:8. Gen 3:15) in order that redemption might be effected. The word "foreordained," therefore, does not signify that Christ pre-existed, but rather that God predetermined that He would provide such a one. The same word is used in regard to His purpose with the saints (Rom 8:29. 1 Pe 1:2).
God determined beforehand what that should be, and from the very beginning, set in motion the means that would bring it to pass. Foreknowledge is the basis of all His dealings with man.
'Before the foundation of the world" - The Greek word rendered "foundation" is katabole. It is derived from the root word ballo "to hurl or cast", and therefore some have rendered katabole as "the disruption". The original "very good" creation was disrupted by sin; its restoration will be by conquest, as David realised and declared in Psa 8:2. This was partially fulfilled in Christ (Heb 2:6-10), who even when facing betrayal and shameful death was confident of his future victory and dominion over all flesh (Joh 16:33; Joh 17:2 and see 1Pe 3:22).
Peter's words in this place teach that before the disruption of the world through sin, God had already made preparation for the coming of one who would redeem His creation from sin and death. Though through foreknowledge He knew that Adam would sin, it was never His intention that His creation would always be subject to sin and death. Hence provision for the redemptive work of Christ was made before sin reared its evil head, before the foundation was laid after it had appeared.
"In these last times"
This expression relates to the last days of Judah's commonwealth then coming to its end. See similar expressions used in Heb 1:1. Heb 9:26. Though the Lord was foreordained from the beginning, his physical manifestation was at the "end of the age" (see Heb 9:26). The word is phaneroo, "to publicly reveal".
The Apostles knowledge nowhere speaks of a pre-existent Christ in his Epistle in fact they all are silent on your belief.
Purity
Nothing Arian about history Mazda...but thankfully it wasn't history according to Constantine.Thanks for the Arian history lesson purity, I didnt need it.
To bad Peter like I have said twice now, wasn't teaching one.
Man....really? :huh:
blessing!!![]()
Purity said:Nothing Arian about history Mazda...but thankfully it wasn't history according to Constantine.
I rest in the confidence of Peters knowledge of a foreordained Christ and not a pre-existent Lord.
If only you had such passages in your arsenal.
P. ;)