I've seen people take the original languages of the Bible, and interpret in what tense they were in, and base theories on that.I mean, some of these writers could've sucked at writing, and maybe wrote something down in the wrong tense and that's leading people astray today.The other side to that is, back then, I'm assuming if you wrote (at all, let alone to be good enough to be writing books), you must be fairly stable at writing in your own language.So should we so strictly base theories on small passages of scripture?Or is it fair game?