rev.13 1

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
Ah, that "inferior" stuff again. The word 'ara' is used in the adverbial sense in the Massoretic text, figurative for lowly. The 'inferior' interpretation is also linked with the fact that the 2nd empire was represented by silver, which is inferior to gold for Babylon.

The Scripture doesn't actually say in what sense it would be inferior to the Babylon kingdom. But with the 3rd kingdom of brass, that is an inferior metal to silver, yet it was to rule over all the earth. So 'ara' is not meant in extent of land sense, but with other qualities that didn't match the Babylon empire which with the Assyrian era lasted well over a thousand years. The Medo-Persia empire lasted something around 240 years.

Impossible to get around the fact of how the order of these empires came about in succesion with the previous one being taken over by the next one, Meod-Persia conquered Babylon, Macedonia conquered Medo-Persia, and the Romans conquered the remnants of Alexander's Macedonian empire.
That inferior stuff??? And you're the one telling me that I disregard God's Word? It actually means, "land inferior!"

You don't like the word because it debunks the RRE! And the atheist like it too because your interpretation is the Protestant interpretation and it debunks the bible!

1. The translation of 'inferior' in Daniel 2 is the only place in the bible where it is translated as 'ground!'
2. The silver is symbolic of the kingdom. The kingdom is not symbolic of the silver! Some people have tried to tell me it's a spiritual inferiority. And some have tried to say it's a cultural inferiority. None of which have any scriptural support.
3. The Median kingdom was inferior in size and duration.

Yet you have not given any credible scriptural support of how the Persian Empire was inferior to Babylon! All of the scriptural support is in opposition to your beliefs! All I have seen so far is unscriptural rhetoric!

This is the word 'inferior' in Daniel 2:39.

http://www.bluelette...ongs=H772&t=KJV

Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had [two] horns: and the [two] horns [were] high; but one [was] higher than the other, and the higher came up last.

Daniel 8 explains the inferior kingdom of Daniel 2. Why is it written that a smaller HORN (kingdom) would come up before the other? Why is it written that the horn that comes up last was taller than the first? The horns that come up give us a picture in motion of the sequence of kingdoms. A small horn comes up first, and the last one to come up is taller! You can't neglect the inferior kingdom in the interpretation of the fourth kingdom.

The Scripture doesn't actually say in what sense it would be inferior to the Babylon kingdom.

It doesn't??? My My are you in denial! Let's see. The word inferior is earth, world, ground??? It is amazing the things Christian's in denial can come up with when they are proven wrong!!!

Daniel 2:39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.
Besides getting out of denial this would be a great verse for you to learn a few things.

The third kingdom is said to, "bear rule over all the earth."

I remember when you said something to the effect about the word all, "that insignificant little three letter word."

Well educate yourself! No kingdom has ever ruled all the earth and you should study that little three letter word because it debunks your one world government theory also.

Atheist have actually used this Protestant mis-interpretation (and your your interpretation as well) of Daniel 2 to debunk the bible because the bible says that Darius took out Babylon and there is very little secular history on Darius and the Median kingdom and invasion of Babylon, I believe the word of God for my interpretation of history and prophecy on this one. You put your faith with the Scribbler and the atheist!

Don't you have as part of a hermeneutic at least some type basis where thye scriptures support one another? What problem are you having accepting the following verses???

Daniel 5:31
"And Darius the Median took the kingdom, (Babylon) being about threescore and two years old."

Isaiah 13:17
"Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, ie.(Babylon)
Jeremiah 51:11 Make bright the arrows; gather the shields: the LORD hath raised up the spirit of the kings of the Medes: for his device is against Babylon, to destroy it; because it is the vengeance of the LORD, the vengeance of his temple.
Isaiah 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
 

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
Veteran,

I have one more comment.

I've continually asked all of you to quote one verse of end-time Prophecy implicating Rome in the last days. Many of you resort to quoting Daniel 2.

Daniel 2 is subject to interpretation since Rome is not explicitly mentioned in those verses.

But surely if Rome is to somehow emerge in the end as the origin of the beast(s), then there would certainly be scriptures to that end.

WHERE ARE THEY???
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
Kaoticprofit said:
Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had [two] horns: and the [two] horns [were] high; but one [was] higher than the other, and the higher came up last. Daniel 8 explains the inferior kingdom of Daniel 2. Why is it written that a smaller HORN (kingdom) would come up before the other? Why is it written that the horn that comes up last was taller than the first?

Mussolini was the small horn and was in power before Hitler, who is the larger horn.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
That inferior stuff??? And you're the one telling me that I disregard God's Word? It actually means, "land inferior!"

You don't like the word because it debunks the RRE! And the atheist like it too because your interpretation debunks the bible!


You go too far with your speculations on that word. History agrees with the Book of Daniel on this. The Babylon kingdom was conquered by the Medo-Persian empire (Dan.5). The Medo-Persian empire was conquered by Alexander of Macedonia and it split into four kingdoms after Alexander died. The Roman empire covered even more lands, and its rule was split up even more between Rome and Byzantine. Yet you want to base your whole theory on that word 'ara' that is used in the adverbial sense.


1. The translation of 'ara' is the only place 'inferior' is translated as such.
2. The silver is symbolic of the kingdom and not the other way around like you would like to believe.
Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had [two] horns: and the [two] horns [were] high; but one [was] higher than the other, and the higher came up last.


Your statement about the silver proves nothing, whether one says the kingdom was inferior because silver is less than gold, or that Medo-Persia was inferior to gold for the Babylon kingdom. The materials that make up the statue image become lesser and lesser in value, and in strength. It's an important pointer, especially for the final 5th beast kingdom with iron mixed with clay, which of course won't mix. We're even show that Christ will strike that beast image upon its feet, the weakest spot materially, and the whole together comes tumbling down.

Daniel 8 explains the inferior kingdom of Daniel 2. Why is it written that a smaller one would come up before the other? Why is it written that the one that comes up last was taller than the first? The horns that come up give us a picture in motion of the sequence of kingdoms. You can't neglect the inferior kingdom in the interpretation of the fourth kingdom. A small horn comes up first, and the last one to come up is taller!


Dan 8:20-22
20 The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia.
21 And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king.
22 Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power.
(KJV)


The two horned ram represents the kings of Media and Persia, as written. The higher of the two horns came up last, representing Persia becoming ascendent over Media. It's simple, and history of Media-Persia fits it.



It doesn't??? My My are you in denial!
Daniel 2:39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.
Besides getting out of denial this would be a great verse for you to learn a few things.

The third kingdom is said to, "bear rule over all the earth."

I remember when you said something to the effect about the word all,"that insignificant little three letter word."

Well educate yourself! No kingdom has ever ruled all the earth and you should study that three letter word because it debunks your one world government theory.


The Scripture is accurate with what happened in history. The Medo-Persia empire was actually divided (as shown by those two horns you're all upset about), which shows what? It had a division of power structure the kingdom of Babylon did not have! The Persians overtook the Medes in rule. So that's a major way the Medo-Persia kingdom was inferior, or like SILVER instead of GOLD (Babylon). The Persian kingdom was not inferior as to extent of land, because it actually included more lands than the Babylon kingdom. But with the two horns as two kings, that shows a division of political power, which Medo-Persia's government was inferior to that of the king of Babylon.

The Persian kingdom overtook all the lands the Babylon kingdom had, and added those lands the Medes and Persians had. It expanded in territory.

The blueprint then? Each successive kingdom would be more and more split politically, while covering more lands and peoples. Political strenght going downwards, coverage of territory and peoples going upwards.


The 3rd kingdom of brass (Alexander's Macedonia) covered more lands than the Persian kingdom. It included all the lands the Persian kingdom had, plus the territories Alexander already had, plus the lands Alexander conquered, plus the lands the four kingdoms conquered after their split from Alexander's death. Beast kingdom territory EXPANDING, political strength WEAKENING.

The 4th kingdom of iron was the Roman empire. It would cover all the lands Alexander claimed, and including the lands it conquered in Europe and the middleast. Still territory EXPANDING. It was strong as iron, but even weaker politically and culturally.

Those previous beast kingdoms of history represented the civilized nations of the then known world. Alexander was even called "lord of the earth" at one time.


The 5th beast of part iron and part clay points to further expansion of the final beast kingdom. The rest of the West and the Far East will be included.

As for the idea of a "one world government", that's no theory. It is fast approaching, and is what the final beast kingdom of Rev.13:1-2 is about.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Veteran,

I have one more comment.

I've continually asked all of you to quote one verse of end-time Prophecy implicating Rome in the last days. Many of you resort to quoting Daniel 2.

Daniel 2 is subject to interpretation since Rome is not explicitly mentioned in those verses.

But surely if Rome is to somehow emerge in the end as the origin of the beast(s), then there would certainly be scriptures to that end.

WHERE ARE THEY???


Russia, China, Germany, Britain, USA are not specifically mentioned for the last days either. Rome isn't specifically mentioned in Daniel, that's right. But the Roman empire was the empire that took over the remnants of Alexander's empire and remnant nations, and wound up with more territory and peoples than any of the 3 previous beast systems.

I never specifically said Rome would emerge as the origin of the end time beasts. I don't believe the pope is the Antichrist. But there is a group of internationalists there called The Club Of Rome that are linked with globalists in Brussels, Britain, NY, etc. The "one world government" idea originates with those globalists, including the Communists in Moscow. One world government is actually about Communist Socialism in its final 3rd phase. All nations are going to play a part in it. Jerusalem will be its head controlling city. Jerusalem will be the Babylon harlot which the world beast carries. All religions will flow to it.
 

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
Veteran said,
The Scripture is accurate with what happened in history.

The scriptures are accurate but not with secular histoy on this issue. I have told you before that there's very little secular history about Darius and the bible is the historical authority on him. Secular history say's that Cyrus invaded and conquered Babylon. Biblical history, which you are in denial of, say's that Darius the Mede conquered Babylon. This contradiction is what atheist Kyle Williams used to say that the book of Daniel debunks the bible. You are in agreement with an atheist! Biblical history, which I agree with, trumps secular history!
Veteran said,
 
The Medo-Persia empire was actually divided (as shown by those two horns you're all upset about),

They were not divided they were confederate!
The bible say's Darius the Mede took the kingdom of Babylon. Darius was older than Cyrus. As was the custom of those days, the elder went into battle first. The Mede's were the better warriors. The Persians were better engineers and nation builders. Cyrus the Great was actually related to "Darius the Mede" through his wife (Mandane) who was the sister of "Darius the Mede". (Their father was Astyges)
The Persian's helped to extend the kingdom after there was a political family dispute among them. About 100 people died as the families of both Darius and Cyrus personally fought one another. And after, they they became a strong confederacy actually known as the Persian empire. They never really battled one another. It was more like a family coup because they were so inter-related by marriage and were allies anyway.
 
I can see that you're unwilling to chage your mind even when there's a mountain of scriptural evidence against you. You have fallen for the mis-interpretation of the high profile prophecy experts. That interpretation is what atheist Kyle Williams used to debunk the bible. On his site his statement is that the book of Daniel debunks the bible. Secular history and the Protestant's say that Cyrus conquered Babylon. They say this because if they didn't that would debunk Rome as the fourth kingdom. So they accept secular history above biblical history and the atheist have caught on and used it to debunk the bible. Your analogy of Daniel 8 is terribly flawed. What you fail to acknowledge is that the higher horn came up last. Which means the smaller horn i.e. The Mede's came up first!
In chapter Daniel 8 the little horn and the king of fierce countenance rises from the four kingdoms that evolved from the Grecian empire. Not the Roman Empire! Does that matter to you???

9  And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
23  And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
and the [two] horns [were] high; but one [was] higher than the other, and the higher came up last. Indicating that the Median Empire rose first!

In Daniel 2, the empires that are described are all past empires and all of them are Mid East empires. The one that is to come, whose kingdom is divided (iron and clay) and who's people are mingled with the seed of men, is destroyed by Christ (stone cut without hands), along with all the other kingdom's of gold, silver, brass, iron and clay. From this "mingling" (arab mix of people) comes the little horn. All are destroyed in the end by the stone that was cut out without hands.

Here is the mountain of scriptural evidence against you but you don't care!

If Cyrus the Persian conquered Babylon why does Daniel 5 say Darius the Mede did?
Daniel 5:31
"And Darius the Median took the kingdom, (Babylon) being about threescore and two years old."

If Cyrus and the Persian's conquered Babylon why does Isaiah say the Mede's did?
Isaiah 13:17
"Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, ie.(Babylon)

If the Persian's conquered Babylon why does Jeremiah say God would raise up the spirit of the Mede's against Babylon?
Jeremiah 51:11 Make bright the arrows; gather the shields: the LORD hath raised up the spirit of the kings of the Medes: for his device is against Babylon, to destroy it; because it is the vengeance of the LORD, the vengeance of his temple.

If Curus was the first king of Babylon, then why does Daniel 9:1 say that in the first year Darius was made king over Babylon?
Daniel 9:1  ¶In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes, which was made king over the realm of the Chaldeans;

If Cyrus was the first king after the invasion of Babylon why is Darius the one who appointed princes and presidents?
Daniel 6:1  ¶It pleased Darius to set over the kingdom an hundred and twenty princes, which should be over the whole kingdom;
2  And over these three presidents; of whom Daniel was first: that the princes might give accounts unto them, and the king should have no damage.
3  Then this Daniel was preferred above the presidents and princes, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king thought to set him over the whole realm.

There's more....but I doubt that would matter to you. You're just like the others. IN COMPLETE DENIAL BECAUSE IT'S IN OPPOSITION TO WHAT YOU ALREADY BELIEVE.

You said,
Russia, China, Germany, Britain, USA are not specifically mentioned for the last days either. Rome isn't specifically mentioned in Daniel, that's right. But the Roman empire was the empire that took over the remnants of Alexander's empire and remnant nations, and wound up with more territory and peoples than any of the 3 previous beast systems.

What Rome did in the past has no bearing on the origin of the future end-time beast! If Rome did have end-time significance it would be clearly stated in scripture but the truth is not one verse implicates Rome in the end and several implicate the Arab's and Muslim's!
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
What Rome did in the past has no bearing on the origin of the future end-time beast! If Rome did have end-time significance it would be clearly stated in scripture but the truth is not one verse implicates Rome in the end and several implicate the Arab's and Muslim's!


Because pagan Rome had MUCH to do with fulfilling the 4th beast requirements of the Book of Daniel, and iron was given as the symbolic metal for its attributes, and... iron is given once again for the final 5th beast, that IS pointing to Rome again.
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
Kaoticprofit - How many times are you going to ask everyone to produce the proper name "Rome" from scripture? This is getting old. Besides, it's been proven to you that Rome was in power at the time of the birth of Christ, indicating that the beast who sat ready to devour the Christ child in Rev 12:4 was indeed, related to Rome ( at the least ), and probably does, in fact, represent Rome, ie; the Roman Empire.

Isn't there anything else you can talk about as it relates to prophetic scripture, or is this going to be your "groundhogs" day, whereby you constantly repeat the same thing over and over and over again? For instance...how do the 4 horsemen relate to Islam? Or how about: How do the two witnesses relate with Islam?

Start a new thread and show us what ya got....
 

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
Kaoticprofit - How many times are you going to ask everyone to produce the proper name "Rome" from scripture? This is getting old. Besides, it's been proven to you that Rome was in power at the time of the birth of Christ, indicating that the beast who sat ready to devour the Christ child in Rev 12:4 was indeed, related to Rome ( at the least ), and probably does, in fact, represent Rome, ie; the Roman Empire.

Start a new thread and show us what ya got....

Another one in denial.

Revelation 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

If Rome indeed has something to do with the end-times, then surely there is at least one verse to support it.

The verse you quote is taken out of context. You're fabricating Rome out of the dragon because that's what you believe and there aren't any verses to support the RRE.
But that doesn't matter to you or the others.

I'm not asking for a proper name. I'm asking for ANYTHING that implies Rome in the last days!

The dragon cannot be Rome because,

1. Verse 5 say's the child was caught up unto God and to His throne indicating this event is well after his resurrection.

And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

2. Verse 9 say's that the dragon was cast out of heaven and that the dragon is Satan........NOT ROME! Rome wasn't cast out of heaven!

Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
3. Verse 7 say's that the dragon fought against Michael and his angels. Rome never did such a thing!

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

Revelation 12 attributes the devouring of the child to the dragon. Not Rome! I can agree that one method the dragon used to destroy Christ in the first century was through Rome. And that was all prophetically fulfilled. But that has nothing to do with the beast of the last days!
Isn't there anything else you can talk about as it relates to prophetic scripture, or is this going to be your "groundhogs" day, whereby you constantly repeat the same thing over and over and over again? For instance...how do the 4 horsemen relate to Islam? Or how about: How do the two witnesses relate with Islam?

I will always refute any of you whenever you mis-interpret Daniel 2 or anytime any of you mention ROME or the RRE as the end-time beast! Get used to it and get over it becuase you're going to hear it often! Especially when God's Word is in direct opposition to some of the teachings I see on the forum. But it seems that no amount of scriptural evidence can change any minds. So I'm going to debunk the false theories I see every time I see them!
After all. If your teachings as well as the teachings of others are good enough for an atheist to use to debunk the bible, then I'm going to be right here reminding you and the forum of the truth!

Because this is a public forum people have difficulty admitting that what they believe may be incorrect. So when people tell me that Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon and the bible says that Darius the Mede conquered Babylon...and when they adhere to what they believe regardless what God's Word has to say....then I know it's a case of denial due to the fact that they would have to admit that what they believe is in error.

The same is true about Rome! Your interpretation of Revelation 12 is also in error. The dragon isn't Rome!
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Another one in denial.

Revelation 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

If Rome indeed has something to do with the end-times, then surely there is at least one verse to support it.

The verse you quote is taken out of context. You're fabricating Rome out of the dragon because that's what you believe and there aren't any verses to support the RRE.
But that doesn't matter to you or the others.

I'm not asking for a proper name. I'm asking for ANYTHING that implies Rome in the last days!

The dragon cannot be Rome because,

1. Verse 5 say's the child was caught up unto God and to His throne indicating this event is well after his resurrection.

And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

2. Verse 9 say's that the dragon was cast out of heaven and that the dragon is Satan........NOT ROME! Rome wasn't cast out of heaven!

Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
3. Verse 7 say's that the dragon fought against Michael and his angels. Rome never did such a thing!

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

Revelation 12 attributes the devouring of the child to the dragon. Not Rome! I can agree that one method the dragon used to destroy Christ in the first century was through Rome. And that was all prophetically fulfilled. But that has nothing to do with the beast of the last days!


I will always refute any of you whenever you mis-interpret Daniel 2 or anytime any of you mention ROME or the RRE as the end-time beast! Get used to it and get over it becuase you're going to hear it often! Especially when God's Word is in direct opposition to some of the teachings I see on the forum. But it seems that no amount of scriptural evidence can change any minds. So I'm going to debunk the false theories I see every time I see them!
After all. If your teachings as well as the teachings of others are good enough for an atheist to use to debunk the bible, then I'm going to be right here reminding you and the forum of the truth!

Because this is a public forum people have difficulty admitting that what they believe may be incorrect. So when people tell me that Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon and the bible says that Darius the Mede conquered Babylon...and when they adhere to what they believe regardless what God's Word has to say....then I know it's a case of denial due to the fact that they would have to admit that what they believe is in error.

The same is true about Rome! Your interpretation of Revelation 12 is also in error. The dragon isn't Rome!


The Rev.12:3-4 verses are not about the time of Christ's first coming, but of Satan's original rebellion, and then his attempt to devour the Seed of the symbolic Woman in Genesis, Eve's child Abel. Seth was born as a replacement for the Seed that Christ would be born through.

He is correct about Rome being the NEXT beast kingdom power in Christ's days though. Iron was a major historical trait of the Roman kingdom.

The "dragon" is not Rome, it is a title given only for Satan himself per the Rev.12:9 and 20:2 verses.

But that does not mean Rome will not have a role to play among the 5th beast kingdom, the final one being setup today. The material of iron being mentioned again in the Book of Daniel about the final beast kingdom of ten toes of part iron mixed with clay is another pointer to Rome for the last days. But it is not a pointer to Rome as head of that beast kingdom, but only partly mixed with it, the clay. The RCC is going to have many apostates in the end just as Protestant Christian Churches will too. It's actually already begun, because of the joining with other world religions in the Inter-Faith Movement.
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
Vet & Kao -

Trying to reason with either one of you is like trying to move mountains, so I'll keep this short.



Rev 12 is a chronological summary of the Jewish nation, from the time of Christ, until they are invaded in our future.
1. Christ ( Christianity ) was born. Judaism gave birth to Christianity. That is why a woman is used as a symbol here. Woman can give birth.( vs1-5 )
( Abel does not, nor will not, "rule all nations with a rod of iron". Only Christ does that. )

2. The woman ( Judaism / Israel ) "fled into the wilderness" ( Masada ) for 3.5 years after the fall of Jerusalem. Masada's walls were breached by Rome in 73 AD. ( vs 6 ).

3. Roughly around the time of the fall of Masada, the new Testament was completed, and Satan was booted from the 3rd heaven. ( vs 7-9 ).

4. The new testament was ( arguably ) completed around 67-68 AD, less The Revelation. We know that Satan was booted from heaven after the NT was written by the clue left us in vs Rev 12:11, that is, "by the word of their testimony", meaning, the gospel accounts, etc.

5. A relatively "short time" is 2 millennia from the birth of Christ to 2nd Coming. ( vs 12 ).

6. During the Diaspora, the Jews were persecuted throughout all the nations they were banished-to, culminating in WWII. ( vs 13 ).

7. After WWII, the Jews returned to Palestine as a nation. ( vs 14 ).

8. Verses 15-17 are yet future, referring to the invasion of Israel by Gog and his hordes.


The dragon that is displayed in Rev 12 is the SAME dragon that is displayed in Rev, chps 17 & 18, with unmistakeable clarity, less the number of crowns. The woman that rides her is another "child bearer" ( hence the reason for a woman as a symbol here yet again ), and is the RCC who GAVE BIRTH TO PROTESTANTISM ( She is the mother of harlots ). And we know that the woman is a Christian organization because she brandishes a "golden cup" in her hand ( unless you two can tell me of another organization, or nation, or city that is symbolized by a "golden cup" ). The RCC is rich, has influenced kings and nations during her long life, has killed many an innocent martyr, has had wealthy land holdings and cathedrals that required many trades to sell her their wares, etc. ). And most important, the RCC is headquartered in R O M E, who is a member of the EU, and indeed, counts as her own governess, VATICAN CITY, who is none other than "that great City" ). And we also know that the EU comprises of nearly all of what use to be THE ROMAN EMPIRE of the past.

Considering the above, and because of the different number of crowns associated with the two composite beasts of Rev 12 and Rev 17, one can only conclude that the dragon of Rev 12 is an earlier version of the beast of Rev 17. Anything else that is extracted from these two composite beasts / dragons is only an attempt to work toward a personal interpretive AGENDA....period!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dismas

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
The dragon that is displayed in Rev 12 is the SAME dragon that is displayed in Rev, chps 17 & 18, with unmistakeable clarity, less the number of crowns. The woman that rides her is another "child bearer" ( hence the reason for a woman as a symbol here yet again ), and is the RCC who GAVE BIRTH TO PROTESTANTISM ( She is the mother of harlots ). And we know that the woman is a Christian organization because she brandishes a "golden cup" in her hand ( unless you two can tell me of another organization, or nation, or city that is symbolized by a "golden cup" ). The RCC is rich, has influenced kings and nations during her long life, has killed many an innocent martyr, has had wealthy land holdings and cathedrals that required many trades to sell her their wares, etc. ). And most important, the RCC is headquartered in R O M E, who is a member of the EU, and indeed, counts as her own governess, VATICAN CITY, who is none other than "that great City" ). And we also know that the EU comprises of nearly all of what use to be THE ROMAN EMPIRE of the past.

I consider what you just said as blasphemy and a perversion of God's Word.

I know that many of the big shots call the harlot "the apostate church." But to attribute the evils of the beast and the harlot mentioned in God's Word about the last days is serious stuff if you are wrong and I know that you are wrong.
Christian's build their church and themselves up by tearing down other churches and Christian's. If you do that in Islam you get your head cut off! The unbiblical teachings of anti-ecumenism has created division and hindered unity in the body of Christ. I'm not here to support Catholic teachings. I'm here to support a Catholic's rightful place in the body of Christ and expose the true religion of the beast. The church has divided itself because Christians can hardly agree on anything and are insistent on slandering it, calling it a whore, and attributing the evils of the anti-christ and his followers to the harlot or what they call, "the apostate church." Just by comparing the conversion rates between Islam and the church worldwide proves that God's church is losing ground and that Satan's religion of Islam is gaining serious ground. Without realizing it, high profile Christian leaders are doing more harm than good to the church and to the unbelieving world than they are promoting the cause of Jesus Christ.

Publicly teaching that the church is a harlot or in a degenerative and fallen state and that it will accept the man of sin is destructive. Isn't the power of God greater than the power of Satan? The world no longer has to discredit Christianity through atheist, agnostics, the media, and former disgruntled believers because the Church is doing it all on their own! Would a political party discredit itself, attribute evil and corruption to itself, and teach it's constituencies that they are fallen away from its true self? What do you think happens to a Muslim who slanders Islam? OUCH! After the comic strip depicting Muhammed as a suicide bomber surfaced, Muslim's were protesting in the streets holding up signs saying, "behead those who slander Islam." Well meaning Christian leaders have distorted the Word of God by slandering others in the faith just to build themselves up.

Most christians know very little about Islam or what apostasy truly is and falsely attributes the harlot and the apostasy to the church. Why are Christians so intent on discrediting the church?. Why would anyone want to convert to Christianity when it's members speak bad about it by calling the church a harlot and attribute it's evils to themselves! Not just the RCC! They discourage people from accepting Jesus Christ and build up other false religion's around them in the process.
The bible doesn't teach us to expose and discuss things in public but to do it in private. Police and fire departments would tell you that your behavior off the job reflects highly on the department and hurts their image. It makes no sense to speak bad about one another as it reflects on the church as a whole.

The world does a good enough job of exposing the sins of the church so we shouldn't be adding salt to the wound.

There's one church I was going to where the pastor spoke bad about Catholic's, Pentecostal's, and Billy Graham on a weekly basis let alone JW'S and Mormons.
John Macarthur is a very prominent man who has a lot of influence and speaks bad about a lot of people. Some people believe they are doing us a service and post videos of his sermons titled, "Billy Graham denies Christ." Others by him dumping a truckload on Catholic's. I refuse to listen to him anymore he has been so offensive.

There's no need for the church to disclose their problems publically. That's something you'd expect to hear in a bar room or hair salon.
This is how the verse should read,

Islam, Babylon the Great, Mother of Jihadist and abominations of the earth!


The harlot is symbolic of Islam who has given birth to the jihadist and they fill the harlot's cup daily in hopes of obtaining up to 70 virgins and 70 mansions in paradise. The more people they kill the more virgins they get. And Hey! Their families get some bennies from Muhammad too! Babylon isn't Rome. In every instance in the New Testament it always infers literal Babylon and it is synonymous with false religion. What Rome did centuries ago is 'mox nix' (doesn't matter) in the last days.

Rev. 17 say's that the harlot is "that Great City?" That city becomes a harlot when the man of sin will stand in a wing of the Dome of the Rock or Al'Aqsa mosque and act as though he is God. From ther he will entice Muslim's to continue their jihad attacks worldwide so that they can dominate the earth. Therefore, East Jerusalem which is God's only Holy City becomes a harlot!

Vatican City and the city of Rome is not built on seven hills, but on only one: Vatican Hill. This hill is not one of the seven Rome was constructed upon. Those seven (the Quirinal, Viminal, Esquiline, Caelian, Aventine, Palatine, and Capitoline hills) are located on the east side of the Tiber River. Vatican Hill is located on the west side.

Mecca is suspect of this city since John was taken to a dessert for the angel to show him the judgment of the Great whore. Mecca is Islam's spiritual headquaters in the dessert!. Many believe that the 'kaaba' or infamous black rock could house a meteorite.

The great city could also be Jerusalem because it is surrounded by seven "mountains." Jerusalem will get tread upon again by the gentiles, i.e. Arab/Muslims, the descendants of Esau and Ishmael. The Islamis anti-christ may use the Dome of the Rock complex or the Al'aqsa mosque in that complex, which is on a 'wing' or extremity of the 'temple, to demand worship, incite violence, and from there rule it's ten nation kingdom. "That great city" could be "Jerusalem."

The other option for 'that great city" or "the city of seven hills is Mecca.

In Rev 17 John is taken by the Spirit into the wilderness, translated dessert, to be shown the judgment of the great whore. The Dessert is where Mecca resides. Rome Italy does not reside in a dessert. Islam has been called "the desert religion." Islam came out of the desert and the seat of Islam is still in the desert today in Mecca, another city of seven hills. The harlot is used interchangeably with Babylon and "that great city." Ancient Babylon is located in Iraq, a Muslim country in the very geographical center of the Islamic world.

Habakkuk 1:6 For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, (Babylonian's) that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwellingplaces that are not theirs.
7 They are terrible and dreadful: ( a terrorist nation) their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.

The harlot (Islam's jihadist) is spread accross the earth and determined to enable Islam to dominate the world. What threat is the RCC to the world today? Rome and the EU are stable unions. The Arab world has always been unstable and they are the ones who want the complete destruction of the Jews, Christian's, and all 'non-Muslim's". It's not Rome Italy or the EU but Islam and the Arab world who is a threat to mankind and the security of the world today. The RCC is powerless to accomplish what is prophecied and attributed to the beast and his followers in the end.

Ethnic tensions and rivalries are common place in Islam and the Arab world. Not so in Italy or the EU! When there are uprisings in the EU it's alway's caused by Muslim's and not Catholic's. There are neighborhoods in the Ghetto's of France that the police will not enter without an escort of armored personnel carriers.
No other religion or government on earth today kills people like Muslim's do. And no religion or government in the past, to include Hitler and the like, have murdered more people than Muslim's. They've had 1400 years to to become the most murderous people on earth.
From the beginning Islam has severely persecuted both Christian's and Jews. Today, nearly everyone that is persecuted or killed is done so at the hands of Muslim's and in the name of Allah.

In the Sudan, 15,000 churches were burned in one year. (1998-99) and thousands of vilages destroyed. The same is true for Darfour, Mogadishu, Nigeria, etc. More christians have been martyred from 1996 to 2002 than in all of history. All at the hands of Muslim's.

Over the centuries the amount of people murdered at the hands of Muslim's far out number those of Rome. It is a fact that Muslim's have murdered more Christian's since 1998 than in all of history! (Voice of the Martyr's)

The anti-christ will change times and laws. Instead of Muslim's bowing toward a black rock in Mecca, the will be required to bow toward him (probably in East Jerusalem) at different times rather than the traditional 5 times a day.
9 They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
Muslim's actually believe that the bible is inspired by God but that it was tampered with. They say that the Koran is the only unadulterated word of God.

Muslim's celebrate after terror attacks by exchanging gifts as they did after the 911 attacks. They will do the same after they murder the two witnesses.

Revelation 17:6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.

There are heretical views in every church. Heresies do not constitute the abominations of the earth. The abominations ascribed to the harlot are desolations, not heresies.

How have the inhabitants of the earth been made drunk with the wine of her (or the vaticans) fornication? It's a no brainer to me! When I see Muslim's dancing in the streets like after Sept 11 or any other terror attacks, they are rejoicing...drunk with the wine of her fornication! Fornication also means "excessive indulgences."

I would say that anyone who believes they will get virgins and mansions in heaven for blowing themselves up or flying airplanes into skyscrapers are dillusional and drunk with the wine of her (Islam, Babylon the Great) fornication. I would also think that the Arab Sheiks who drink in secret are drunk with the wine of fornicating with foreign investors who have made them rich.

And yet Islam, one of the most primitive religions of the world is going to use the most sophisticated weapons of the world to bring us tribulation.
Abomination means...disgusting, detestable, a detestable thing that brings desolation. How is the Vatican doing anything detesable that brings forth desolation. I shouldn't have to mention AGAIN the detesable things that Islam is doing that brings forth desolation. And we haven't seen anything yet!
 
Islamic prophecy is surprisingly similar to biblical prophecy and in many ways the religion is quite similar to christianity.
Islam is counterfeit christianity.
Muslim's claim Allah is just a differnt name for the God of christianity.
Muslim's are waiting for their Messiah, the 12th Imam to return, and christianity is also waiting for their Messiah. Muslim's also believe in Jesus and his return, but that Jesus will be the subordinate to the returning Mahdi.
This Muslim jesus may be one of the false Christ prophecied to come in the last days.
Muslim's believe that it is Muhammad and not Jesus that is the prophet like unto Moses.
Muslim's believe that Jesus wasn't cricified.
Muslim's believe that if a Muslim confesses that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, he has committed the only unpardonable sin in Mohammed's religion. Islam is not only the opposite of christianity, it is counterfeit christianity.

The colors of the flag in almost all Arab nations are the same colors of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse! And I believe that all four riders are all of Arab/Muslim origin. I say "holy war" is symbolic of the first seal and Bin laden is the rider!

Revelation 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.

I find it interesting that the Koran has 6,666 surah's in it.
Islam, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Jihadist is the Harlot of Revelation

Today, it's not priest and altar boys who are strapping bombs to themselves and detonating them in market places, bus stations, airports and schools. It's not the altar boys who cut peoples heads off and puts them on a card table in the middle of a street so the common people can see what happens to Muslim apostates. It's not Catholic's who are sending disabled women into pet stores with a bird cage laced with explosives and remotely detonating them. It wasn't Catholic's in Saudi Arabia who sent 14 teenage school girls back into a burning school building to die for coming out of it with their faces uncovered. It wasn't Catholic's who cut the off heads of 5 Chinese children and placed them on wooden stakes in the middle of a highway median strip. It's not Bishops and Cardinals who entice people to kill others with the reward of 72 virgins in paradise. It's the Islamic whore of Babylon! The Harlot holds a cup full of the abominations of the earth commited by the jihadist. The Catholic's no longer do these kind of things.

...a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
The woman is symbolic of Islam and she is the mother of harlots. She gave birth to all it's radical sects i.e. the jihadist who commit the abominations of the earth. The harlot's religion is called Babylon the Great, (a large false religion i.e. ISLAM) Islam 'occupies' or is the religion of the ten horned beast or ten nation Islamic empire whose radical sects fill the harlots cup with the abominations of the earth. The ten nations will only have seven kings and one king over them. There are currently 18 countries in apostasy (rebellion) as wee speak. As the kings and nations fall, the man of sin will be revealed.
The jihadist are responsible for commiting the abominations of the earth that fill the harlot's cup..
The jihadist have always used abominable means the desolate mankind.

In my view. This entire symbol is a united 10 nation Middle-East Empire dominated by Islam. Muslim's are scattered all over the earth and many of them are radicals commited to the cause of jihad or "holy war". Islam 'occupies' or practices their religion in nearly every country in the world.

Now explain to me how Italy is commiting the abominations of the earth?
 

revturmoil

New Member
Feb 26, 2011
816
11
0
69
New Hampshire's North Woods
I ran out of edit time on my previous post.

I omited the word 'church' on the first line. It should read,

"I know that many of the big shots call the harlot "the apostate church." But to attribute the evils of the beast and the harlot to the church is serious stuff if you are wrong and I know that you are wrong.

Popeye,
I'm discouraged to post some of my "stuff'." The way I look at it is like this. The bible clearly states that that Darius and the Mede's conquered Babylon and that's in complete accord with the Mede's being the inferior kingdom as well as every other verse of end-time prophecy. That can't be said about Rome or the RRE as it contradicts a host of scriptures. That as well as the word mixed which denotes an Arabian debunks the Roman Empire as the fourth kingdom of Daniel 2. But most of you still can't agree with God's Word on the issue and still argue in opposition to God's Word and say that Cyrus did.

The Word of God is absolutely explicit on the subject. Too many Christian's are unwilling to change their minds even when the Word of God is absolutely explicit on the subject.
I'm discouraged to post any more of my 'stuff' because if you guys can't see the explicit truth, I have no confidence that any of you could see the truth through your already self indoctrinated minds that just won't budge.
There are three types of Christians.
 
The first group is those who believe what they are told to believe and never question it. Many church goers just accept what the denomination or the pastors teach and simply accept it no questions asked.

The second group contains those who believe whatever they want to believe regardless of the evidence. They have accepted the research of others or have come up with their own theories and prophecy beliefs. They refuse to change their minds and don't care what the scriptural evidence is. This is true with false doctrines like pretribulationism and the false theory of the revived Roman Empire.

The third group is made up of those who seek truth and are willing to change their mind regardless of what the truth is or where it may be found. You and nearly everyone else who participates in the prophecy forum are part of the second group who believes what they want to regardless of the scriptural evidence.
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
Kaoticprofit-

Obviously, you are a younger man, understandably concerned with the rise of Islamic jihad, and the emphasis placed on it in this day and age. However, Muslims' days are numbered by prophecy and God's prediction of their eradication during the coming Gog invasion of Israel.

It has been my experience in these prophecy forums - for years - that the majority of those that participate, are those who have their own, unmovable interpretation of scripture. So, it comes as no surprise to me that you, Veteran, BibleScribe and I, in particular, have our own established ideas of how the prophecies should be interpreted. We should all understand this....as I certainly do. However, like the one I interpret as coming as the end time messenger of God, The Truth SHALL BE DISPENSED ON ALL PEOPLES, AS PROMISED, when that time is so determined by God. Yet, the person God has predicted to come shall NOT DEBATE The Truth, but merely dispense it. Therefore, the nagging question to all of us is not if it IS THE TRUTH he portends, in itself, but rather, WHO OF US WILL BELIEVE IT TO BE THE TRUTH?

Like this forum....many may hear truths here, but those same may reject The Truth bits they hear because of ego or pride or long suffering efforts. This shall be true for the end time messenger of God as well. And that is why he will not argue what is Truth, but simply dispense that truth for those who God so chooses to HEAR that Truth. That is why I believe the end times messenger of God will not begin his grass-roots ministry in the established end times church, but rather, he will start outside of the church and slowly draw-in those from the many congregations who hear his Truth.

As to my "blasphemous slanderings" of the Christian churches of this generation, I can only tell you that I was generalizing the insidious epidemic that plagues M A N Y ( but not all ) churches today. They have made a business of The Truth, when they should have been making The Truth their business. I DID NOT include all churches in my statement. You assumed I meant all churches. You assumed wrong. I said the RCC can claim motherhood to many harlot protestant organizations. And they can. I also do include the RCC ORGANIZATION AND THEIR HIGH RANKING CLERGY in my "slanderous" remarks because they are fitting, considering their inheritance of a long historical record of bloodletting of martyrs in the name of Christ. And I also include their elevation of the POPE as a FATHER, as blasphemous in it's own right, as scripture instructs us to refer the God, ONLY, as our "father". If you don't know the history of the RCC, then you are nieve to The Truth. If you accept mega churches, and TV evangelists, and the "Crystal Cathedral", and Joel Osteen, and 1/2 million so-called prophetic "scholars" intent on doubling their profits through book sales taking advantage of prophetic fulfillments, or the David Koresh's, Warren Jeffs and Mormonism, Jim Jones and snake handlers, and ( the list goes on forever ), as "churches", then by all means, count me as a blasphemer. And if you count churches that use their collections to send their ministers to Palestine on repeated visits to "gain understanding", and coddle their congregations to attract congregants by offering them "feel-good christianity", and their youth trips to Disneyland, to keep them coming to their churches, than you are not "seeing the handwriting on the wall" with regards to christian churches today. Or, if you believe that many churches nowadays provide fundraisers and charitable efforts under the guise of caring for the less fortunate, but in actuality, are only keeping pace with the "Jones", and their sister congregations, then you need a dose of the real world in your life.

Call me a blasphemer if you will, but until you have experienced what I have, then maybe you could better understand the prophecies that relate to this end times church, and the real meaning of the prophecy set forth in Rev 17 & 18. Until then, I offered you a fresh insight on the meaning of Rev 12, and the purpose for which women are used as symbols in that book, to which you totally ignored, in your rush to diatribe Islamic jihadists in your interpretive opinion.

So who is the one not listening here?

Oh, btw, I didn't realize that Islam is symbolized by a golden chalice. I didn't realize Muslims drank from a cup symbolically-filled with the blood of Muhammed cruxcified, and ate bread to represent his body. Please, show me where Islam uses a cup in their rituals of Muhammed's blood and body. And while you're at it, show me a city or country that is symbolized by "a cup filled with the abominations and filthiness" of their fornications. I'd be interested to see how you 'spin" that....because there is absolutely NO ONE, or NO ORGANIZATION , outside of Christianity, that holds as their symbol - a cup - for taking the sacramental blood of Christ in ritual. NO ONE, period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dismas

n2thelight

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2006
4,052
787
113
60
Atlanta,Ga
and i stood upon the sand of the sea. who can tell me what this means? :rolleyes: just those few words not all of the verse. then i'll know who understands.
ohmy.gif

Revelation 13:1 "And I [John] stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy."

This is John's vision, and the sea that John is standing on and the beast is rising out of represents the masses of peoples of the world. This symbol of the "sea" being people is documented in Revelation 17:15. This "sea", or masses of people are looking to this "beast" [political beast] as their peace system. The "seven heads" are seven dominions of the people, or seven continents of this world body; as even the activities and divisions at the North and South Poles are governed through the United Nations Charter. It covers the entire world land masses.

Revelation 17:15 "And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues."
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Vet & Kao -

Trying to reason with either one of you is like trying to move mountains, so I'll keep this short.

Same could easily be said about you.


Rev 12 is a chronological summary of the Jewish nation, from the time of Christ, until they are invaded in our future.
1. Christ ( Christianity ) was born. Judaism gave birth to Christianity. That is why a woman is used as a symbol here. Woman can give birth.( vs1-5 )
( Abel does not, nor will not, "rule all nations with a rod of iron". Only Christ does that. )


Not quite right. What exactly was or is "the Jewish nation"? No such term coined in my Bible that I can find.


Rev.12:1 is about God's Israel; those symbols first given in Genesis 37 in Joseph's dream about his eleven brethren and his mother and father. The symbolic "woman" represents Israel.

Rev.12:2 is about the Seed of the Woman, Eve, being pained in birth to bring forth the Seed which our Lord Jesus would be born through. The start of that Seed was Abel that Satan influenced Cain to murder. Seth was given as a replacement, and is who Christ would descend from.

Rev.12:3 and part of 4 is about Satan's ORIGINAL rebellion against God in the time of old, "the world that then was" per Peter. That was a time prior to the existence of Adam and Eve in God's Garden. From the time of Adam to the present is Peter's "the heavens and the earth, which are now" (2 Pet.3). That old beast kingdom of ten horns, seven heads, but only seven crowns, was what Satan originally rebelled with in the days of old prior to Adam and Eve. There was... a pre-Adamic heavens and earth which God destroyed at Satan's overthrow. The child the dragon (Satan) stood before the Woman in order to devour represents the Seed of Christ from the Woman. It was Abel that was devoured.

Rev.12:5 is about Christ as the Man Child of the Woman Who is to rule over all nations with a rod of iron. So everything up to this point was past history. Christ ruling with that rod of iron is still future to us.

Rev.12:6 is still future prophecy; though some see it connected with God's scattering of the ten tribes of Israel to the West, with the West representing that wilderness where they would be given 'rest' for a time to build their strength in becoming the western nations. Yet that 1260 days is in connection with the Daniel prophecy for the last days.

Rev.12:7 is still future; that war in Heaven between Michael and his angels vs. Satan and his angels is what begins the coming great tribulation. It's parallel is given in Dan.12:1 about the time of trouble on earth the likes which the world has never experienced before, the same kind of marker Christ gave about the "great tribulation" He warned of.

Rev.12:8 is about the abode in the heavenly of Satan and his angels no longer being found there anymore. We know this was not about his first rebellion in the time of old, because in the Book of Job Satan and his angels appear in the heavenly before God's Throne.

Rev.12:9 is the revealing of the new place Satan and his angels are cast to, to this present earth, to OUR earthly dimension. We're given the marker of his deceving of the whole world, which is an endtime tribulation marker in connection with his working of deception in Rev.13 for the tribulation.

Rev.12:10 is a Heavenly view after Satan and his angels are cast out of Heaven to our earthly dimension upon this earth. Those in Heaven are joyous because Satan as the Accuser is no longer there in Heaven, nor able to accuse God's people before God's Throne, like Satan did with accusing Job. Those in Heaven rejoice because of that, because Christ's Salvation and God's Kingdom only is manifest there by that event of Satan's casting down to the earth.

Rev.12:11 is an endtime tribulation marker about God's elect that will be delivered up when Satan gets here, and they will overcome Satan by The Blood of The Lamb Jesus Christ. It's about the 5th Seal events.

Rev.12:12 is about those in Heaven rejoicing because of the previous events of Satan's casting out of Heaven, but a woe is given to those on earth because Satan and his angels are cast down on the earth among them, having great wrath, and knows he has only a short time left to deceive. Already this is plenty enough evidence to know these events are not about Satan's original rebellion in the time of old, like back at Rev.12:3-4. This casting to the earth is about the last days.

Rev.12:13 is another marker that this casting out is for the last days, for Satan goes to persecute the Woman that gave birth (past tense) to The Man Child (Christ Jesus). That is putting this casting out AFTER at a minimum for a time AFTER Christ's birth by the symbolic Woman. That's another marker of how we know this casting out of Satan is for the last days, and not at his original rebellion before Adam and Eve.

Rev.12:14 is another pointer to the 1260 days, or 3.5 years, of Israel going into the wilderness for protection. It is symbolic only for protection against Satan's deceptions once he gets here on earth for the tribulation time. The next verses will reveal that.

Rev.12:15 is about Satan on earth casting lies of deception out of his mouth specifically at the symbolic Woman.

Rev.12:16 is a symbolic pointer to the flood of Noah's day for protection of the Woman during Satan's lies of deception.

Rev.12:17 reveals who Satan will specifically go after once he's cast to the earth in the last days, pointing to the faithful of Christ's Church on earth.
 

gregg

New Member
Oct 16, 2009
321
37
0
arab
Revelation 13:1 "And I [John] stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy."

This is John's vision, and the sea that John is standing on and the beast is rising out of represents the masses of peoples of the world. This symbol of the "sea" being people is documented in Revelation 17:15. This "sea", or masses of people are looking to this "beast" [political beast] as their peace system. The "seven heads" are seven dominions of the people, or seven continents of this world body; as even the activities and divisions at the North and South Poles are governed through the United Nations Charter. It covers the entire world land masses.

Revelation 17:15 "And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues."

water you can drink but don't dip your cup in the sea. :rolleyes: thier differant
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
Vet -

I did admit that I was as unmovable as you. :rolleyes:

Everyone knows that Herod - puppet of the Roman Empire - attempted to rid the infant Christ when Herod initiated the "slaughter of the innocents". Rev 12:4 could be no other reference. This is just biblical history that any child understands.

Israel / Judaism ( a belief system that gives birth to an offshoot belief system ) can be the only reference established in Rev 12:4, ONCE AGAIN, because the child was to "rule all nations with a rod of iron". Unless Abel does that - which he doesn't, and won't - then you are incorrect in your assessment that the verse is referencing the child Abel, and /or Seth.

Of course the dragon represents Satan at his fall, but it also represents Rome who occupied Palestine at the time of Christ's birth. And the image is repeated multiple times in prophetic scripture, from Dan to Rev.

Christ's birth and infancy is history, period. The operating words here are, "who was to rule....", which is synonymous with "who is to rule". That means future.

The two wings of a great eagle is referencing the USA's lead role in returning the Jews to Palestine at the end of WWII ( through the UN of course, initially ), and their subsequent support for the nation of Israel since WWII, whereby the power of post-war US helped protect Israel from her enemies while she returned back to health ( nourished ). Palestine before 1948 was a desert wasteland because the arabs did nothing with the land while they inhabited it for nearly 2 millennia, during the Jews absence. Since 1948 however, Jews have turned the wasteland into a garden in the desert ( part of the reason the Palestinians are so interested in it, because someone else did the work for them ). And there is a set time period for Israel's "nourishing" to take place, before she is invaded by Gog ( a time, times and 1/2 a time ).

The "flood" is nothing other than an invasion of Israel. period. And God will destroy those invading armies by initiating an earthquake, with accompanying fissures in the earth's crust, which literally "swallows" the invading armies. This couldn't be plainer or simpler. And this is the prefferred way God has destroyed many armies of the past. This verse ( Rev 12:15 ) is referencing none other than the invasion of Gog. period.

And after the failed invasion, Rev 12:17 forecasts that Satan - THROUGH HIS ORDAINED ANTICHRIST - initiates the Great Trib. period ( in the 1st half of Dan's week ) and persecutes the believing remnant of Jews in Israel ( in the 2nd half of Dan's 70th week ). And THAT is why the believing remnant of Jews in Israel are instructed by Christ to flee to the hills when AC sets up the AOD. That is why John positioned the info in Chapter 13 directly behind verse 17....



Your rendition of chapter 12, I'm sorry Vet, is convoluted and ambiguous, and makes little sense.
 

veteran

New Member
Aug 6, 2010
6,509
212
0
Southeast USA
Vet -

I did admit that I was as unmovable as you. :rolleyes:

Everyone knows that Herod - puppet of the Roman Empire - attempted to rid the infant Christ when Herod initiated the "slaughter of the innocents". Rev 12:4 could be no other reference. This is just biblical history that any child understands.

Though Herod did try to destroy Christ, the subject began with the start of the symbolic Woman. Can't just pass up all the previous attempts in the OT of Satan trying to destroy the Seed of the Woman that our Lord would be born through. Because Rev.12:3 and part of verse 4 is about Satan's ORIGINAL REBELLION, long... before Herod's day, that also points to how far back in history these verses represent, with the murder of Abel being the actual start of attack by Satan upon the Seed of the Woman. Whether children understand these first four verses is irrelevant, since many adults still don't even understand it.


Israel / Judaism ( a belief system that gives birth to an offshoot belief system ) can be the only reference established in Rev 12:4, ONCE AGAIN, because the child was to "rule all nations with a rod of iron". Unless Abel does that - which he doesn't, and won't - then you are incorrect in your assessment that the verse is referencing the child Abel, and /or Seth.

Christ IS the Man Child that is to rule all nations with a rod of iron, and that's yet future to us today! I have no problem with that point. But that time marker is given in the LAST part of the Rev.12:5 verse. Rev.12:3 is SPECIFICALLY about Satan's overthrow, his drawing of a third of the angels into rebellion with him against God. That happened PRIOR to Adam and Eve in God's Garden. No way to move that forward to Christ's days, as it would show Biblical ignorance. Once again, the time of Satan's overthrow being given relates back to first attacks upon the Seed of the Woman that Christ would come through. Gen.3:15 is the first time that 'emnity' is declared by our Heavenly Father.

Your reference to Israel/Judaism giving birth to Christianity is a false pop tradition. It's because Judaism represents a 'corruption' in the system of OT worship that God first gave to Israel. Judaism is a newer religion that began with Judah's Babylon captivity, and uses mostly the Babylonian Talmud sage traditions instead of The Bible. That's why Judaism and Christianity are so vehemently opposed against each other. It's why Apostle Paul would make a clear distinction between "the Jew's religion" and Christianity. Or didn't you know that, which that truly is something a little child today could understand?


Of course the dragon represents Satan at his fall, but it also represents Rome who occupied Palestine at the time of Christ's birth. And the image is repeated multiple times in prophetic scripture, from Dan to Rev.

The "dragon" title in God's Word has NEVER represented anyone but Satan himself, per Rev.12:9 and 20:2. Trying to apply it to someone else, or something else, is another pop tradition of men.


Christ's birth and infancy is history, period. The operating words here are, "who was to rule....", which is synonymous with "who is to rule". That means future.

Christ's birth is suggested with the Rev.12:5 verse, or didn't you notice? The "who was to rule" is not a past history timeline. It's a future history prophecy, declaring Christ's future Millennium reign with His elect priests and kings, whom He promised in Rev. would also rule with a rod of iron over the nations. That has yet to happen today, but it will, at Christ Jesus' second coming, which is still future to us.



The two wings of a great eagle is referencing the USA's lead role in returning the Jews to Palestine at the end of WWII ( through the UN of course, initially ), and their subsequent support for the nation of Israel since WWII, whereby the power of post-war US helped protect Israel from her enemies while she returned back to health ( nourished ). Palestine before 1948 was a desert wasteland because the arabs did nothing with the land while they inhabited it for nearly 2 millennia, during the Jews absence. Since 1948 however, Jews have turned the wasteland into a garden in the desert ( part of the reason the Palestinians are so interested in it, because someone else did the work for them ). And there is a set time period for Israel's "nourishing" to take place, before she is invaded by Gog ( a time, times and 1/2 a time )

Too much supposition. Way... too much. The verse does not suggest all those things. The 1260 days is a specific tribulation time marker given in the Book of Daniel, and in the rest of Rev. But you've opted for an agenda tradition of men's doctrine outside God's Word.


The "flood" is nothing other than an invasion of Israel. period. And God will destroy those invading armies by initiating an earthquake, with accompanying fissures in the earth's crust, which literally "swallows" the invading armies. This couldn't be plainer or simpler. And this is the prefferred way God has destroyed many armies of the past. This verse ( Rev 12:15 ) is referencing none other than the invasion of Gog. period.

We're told that flood comes out of the serpent's mouth. Armies don't come out one's mouth, but words do. It's about deception, through lies, and it's specifically set for the time of the tribulation, not the invasion of Gog and Magog upon Israel on the LAST day. The tribulation happens PRIOR to the Gog invasion, which is when Christ returns on the day of The LORD.



And after the failed invasion, Rev 12:17 forecasts that Satan - THROUGH HIS ORDAINED ANTICHRIST - initiates the Great Trib. period ( in the 1st half of Dan's week ) and persecutes the believing remnant of Jews in Israel ( in the 2nd half of Dan's 70th week ). And THAT is why the believing remnant of Jews in Israel are instructed by Christ to flee to the hills when AC sets up the AOD. That is why John positioned the info in Chapter 13 directly behind verse 17....

Like I said, the Ezekiel 38 - 39 events occur TO END the coming tribulation at Christ's coming. Christ's army He brings with Him is going to fight that Gog and Magog army, ON THE LAST DAY OF THIS WORLD. If an invading army takes Jerusalem prior to the trib, it won't be that Ezek.38 army out of the north. In Dan.11 we're shown that the ships of Chttim shall come against the vile person and grieve him. That's about the Ezek.38 event towards the end of the tribulation, when the false one will have an evil thought come in his mind, and think to go upon the mountains of Israel to destroy. That's when Christ Jesus will step in. The word Chittim means 'bruisers'. Recall Gen.3:15 prophecy about the serpent's head being bruised. It's going to happen DURING the tribulation, and will make him seek to destroy Israel in toto.


Study, study, study.
 

popeye

New Member
Jul 12, 2011
160
3
0
I love it when a member posts statements that say to another member, "study, study, study",. Statements like that suggests the member who posted the statement is "the teacher", and the person they are addressing the statement to, is "the student".....Frankly, these kind of statements are the height of arrogance....it also indicates to me ( from years of forum debate experience ) that the person who made the statement is completely empty of answers to the questions that are posed.

Perhaps Veteran, when you are REALLY ready to interpret prophecy, you will cease pawning-off repeating scripture as some sort of "interpretation" and you will also cease relegating every prophecy you repeat as something related to "the future" ( so that you don't have to fully define what that prophecy is stating ). Frankly, that's all you've done in your conversation with me concerning Rev 12. You have repeated the passages in Rev 12 and placed most of chp 12 in the future, so that you wouldn't have to interpret it....because, frankly, you can't interpret it.

Incidentally, it never states that the dragon, in fact, devoured the child. It DOES say the dragon was READY TO DEVOUR the child, but it never says the child was devoured. Indeed, it says the child wasn't devoured at all, but was "caught up to God". And the woman was also "ready to be delivered", just as Israel was waiting for a "deliverer" ( Messiah ) to come to rescue them away from bondage under the Roman yoke. That is why she was "ready to be delivered". Unfortunately, while they were waiting for a "conquering Messiah" to come, they received a "suffering Messiah". These passages have nothing at all to do with Adam & Eve, or Cain & Abel, or the garden of Eden. Eve, I'm sure, was "pained to be delivered" with Cain as well....unless God performed a C-section on Eve while under a heavenly anesthetic.....but that would have countermanded God's own statement concerning her pained conceptions in Genesis 3:16. ( Btw, who was Cain afraid of when he received his "mark"? His parents? Hardly....)

From verses 12:5 thru to verse 17 - nearly all of the chapter - Veteran pawns-off as "interpretation" repeating what is said in those passages, while relegating everything written to "the future". What an easy way to interpret scripture! In fact, like many people who claim they know prophecy, he repeats what is already presented to us as though he is interpreting something. Indeed, your form of "interpretation" is parroting scripture under the guise of some sort of interpretation. That isn't interpretation at all. Therefore - and I say this with hesitant reciprocation - you may need to do some more studying yourself, because you haven't interpreted a single piece of prophecy in Rev 12.