1 John 1:9 is not for the Born again.
1 John 3:9 is for the born again.
Try to figure out why, Enoch111
1Jn 1:8 if we may say—'we have not sin,' ourselves we lead astray, and the truth is not in us;
1Jn 1:9 if we may confess our sins, stedfast He is and righteous that He may forgive us the sins, and may cleanse us from every unrighteousness;
1Jn 1:10 if we may say—'we have not sinned,' a liar we make Him, and His word is not in us.
If we say (ean eipōmen). Condition of third class with ean and second aorist (ingressive, up and say) active subjunctive. Claiming fellowship with God (see 1Jn_1:3) involves walking in the light with God (1Jn_1:5) and not in the darkness (skotos here, but skotia in Joh_1:5). See 1Jn_2:11 also for en tēi skotiāi peripateō.
We lie (pseudometha). Present middle indicative, plain Greek and plain English like that about the devil in Joh_8:44.
Do not the truth (ou poioumen tēn alētheian). Negative statement of the positive pseudometha as in Joh_8:44. See Joh_3:21 for “doing the truth,” like Neh_9:33.
If we say (ean eipōmen). See 1Jn_1:6.
We have no sin (hamartian ouk echomen). For this phrase see Joh_9:41; Joh_15:22, Joh_15:24. That is, we have no personal guilt, no principle of sin.
This some of the Gnostics held, since matter was evil and the soul was not contaminated by the sinful flesh, a thin delusion with which so-called Christian scientists delude themselves today.
We deceive ourselves (heautous planōmen). Present active indicative of planaō, to lead astray. We do not deceive others who know us. Negative statement again of the same idea, “the truth is not in us.”
Robertson
Purpose, Occasion, and Background
It is customary to understand
1 John as a response to the rise of an early
form of Gnosticism.
This was a religious mysticism that pirated Christian
motifs to propagate an understanding of salvation based on esoteric
“knowledge” (Gk. gnōsis).
According to this view, redemption is through
affirming the divine light already in the human soul, not through repentance
of sin and faith in Christ’s death to bring about spiritual rebirth.
Writings
widely publicized in recent years, like the Gospel of Thomas and Gospel of
Judas, for example, were products of Gnostic writers. But the heyday of
Gnostic thought was the second through fifth centuries, well after the time
the NT books were written. It can neither be proven nor ruled out that John
had this movement in mind as he wrote.
The study notes for this book will focus on what seems definite in 1 John
rather than what can be imagined.
John wrote to Christians who had
witnessed an exodus from their ranks (2:19).
This does not mean that all
John wrote should be interpreted as a response to schism—John is neither
anti-Gnostic nor anti-schismatic. John’s focus is positive, not polemical. His
aim is redemptive, not reactionary. He urges readers to refine their
theological understanding, sharpen their ethical rigor, and heighten their
devotional intensity.
That is, they must grow in faith, obedience, and love.
Yet the letter is not a list of dos and don’ts. It is rather a manifesto of
“Done!”—Jesus’ words “It is finished” (John 19:30) come to mind. First
John highlights what God the Father has “done” in sending Christ the Son,
offering him up as a sacrifice for sins, and sending forth “the word of life” (1
John 1:1) that is causing this world’s darkness to pass away and the true light
of the coming age to shine (2:8).
God’s action becomes the mandate of those who believe in his Son.
“Whoever does the will of God abides forever” (2:17). God’s will is for
readers to receive the saving message of Christ’s coming, rejoice in the
commands of Christ’s teaching, and revel in the love of the Father as it
continually translates into Christian love for one another and ministry to the
world. This is “not love in word or talk but in deed and in truth” (3:18)
Purpose
To clarify the difference between those who belong to God and those who belong to this world so that
the church may enjoy peace and joy in Christ.
1 John 1.9 was written to Christians, no question about it.
So was 1 John 3.9