ROMANS: JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,522
17,194
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I believe that Paul goes down a line of reasoning from Romans 2:13 all the way down to Romans 3:28...by which he comes to the conclusion that he tells us in Romans 3:28.

You would do well to follow that line of reasoning; by which I think that you will see that no one is justified through keeping the law.
I disagree, I didn't say you'll be justified by keeping the law, I said, in the spirit of Romans 2:13 that you obey the law in hope of being justified of God, which is what Romans 2:13 says. Your reasoning appears to ignore that verse in the end. Cheers, and thanks for not attacking me as others do here :)
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I disagree, I didn't say you'll be justified by keeping the law, I said, in the spirit of Romans 2:13 that you obey the law in hope of being justified of God, which is what Romans 2:13 says. Your reasoning appears to ignore that verse in the end. Cheers, and thanks for not attacking me as others do here :)

You're welcome! :)

If you seek to obey the law in the hopes of being justified by God, then it would seem to me that your hope of being justified does not rest solely and squarely on your faith in Jesus Christ.

It seems to me that Romans 2:13 is saying that, while we are justified through faith in Christ, those who have faith in Christ will also be sanctified...and therefore they will not be violators of the law.

In bearing the fruit of the Spirit, there is no law that condemns their behaviour....which means that they do not violate the law...because of bearing the fruit of the Spirit. Another way of putting this is to say that the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit.

But we receive the Spirit in the first place through faith in Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:14)...so walking in the Spirit is the result of faith.

It is not that we look to obey a set of do's and don'ts in order to be justified...the venue by which we obtain the righteousness of God is through faith, apart from the law...while the law and the prophets attest to the fact that it is righteousness indeed (Romans 3:21).

Again, we obtain this righteousness through faith in Jesus through whom we receive the Spirit...and through the Spirit we bear the fruit of the Spirit; against which there is no law (Galatians 5:22-23).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dev553344

historyb

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2011
2,990
2,701
113
52
in a house
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"I don't believe in Salvation by Faith alone but Salvation by God's Grace alone through faith,"

Please expound on what you mean


I reject the evangelical/Protestant doctrine of Faith alone. There is no alone in the Bible and when Luther translated his bible he added the word alone, that word was never there to begin with and since then evangelicals has believed in false things. We are saved by God's Grace, without which no Salvation is possible. I probably have not explained it good but I found some articles which one I quote here:

The only place in the New Testament where the phrase “faith alone” is actually used is in the Letter of James 2:24, where the Scriptures say precisely the opposite: “that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.” The entire context of that passage is given below, translated from the original Greek:


14What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no works? Can such faith save him? 15Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. 16If one of you says to him, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but gives him nothing for his physical needs, what good is it? 17In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by works, is dead.


18But someone will say, “You have faith; I have works.” Show me your faith without works, and I will show you my faith by my works.



19You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.


20You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without works is useless? 21Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for his works when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? 22You see that his faith and his works were working together, and his faith was made complete by his works. 23And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend. 24You see that a person is justified by his works and not by faith alone.



25In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? 26As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead.


So, if James 2:24 is the only place in the New Testament where the phrase “faith alone” is actually used and it has the opposite meaning than what is normally given it by, for example, many Protestant, evangelical and nondenominational Christians, where did their understanding of the phrase initially come from and who made it into a slogan? The answer: Martin Luther, the 16th century Reformer.


Martin Luther, in his German translation of the Bible – a translation that had as powerful an impact on the German language as the King James Version had on English – inserted the word “alone” (allein in German) in Romans 3:28 making the text read: 28For we maintain that a man is justified by faith (alone) apart from works of the law.


Roman Catholic scholars of the 16th century knew this word was not in the original Greek text of Romans 3:28 and took Martin Luther to task for this intentional mistranslation. Father Georges Florovsky, a patristics scholar and well-known Orthodox theologian of the last century who taught at Harvard and Princeton and was the dean of St. Vladimir’s Seminary in the 1950’s, wrote the following about this Reformation controversy: “Luther even added the word “alone”—allein—in Romans 3:28 before “through faith” precisely to counter the words in James 2:24: “You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.” What is more is that Luther became very aggressive and arrogant in his response to the criticism that he had added “alone” to the Biblical text. “If your papist makes much useless fuss about the word sola, allein, tell him at once: Doctor Martin Luther will have it so and says: Papist and donkey are one thing; sic volo, sic jubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas. For we do not want to be pupils and followers of the Papists, but their masters and judges.” Luther continues in a bantering manner in an attempt to imitate St. Paul in the latter’s response to his opponents in the Corinthian correspondence (2 Corinthians 11:22-23): “Are they doctors? So am I. Are they learned? So am I. Are they preachers? So am I. Are they theologians? So am I. Are they philosophers? So am I. Are they writers of books? So am I. And I shall further boast: I can expound Psalms and Prophets; which they cannot. I can translate; which they cannot . . . Therefore the word allein shall remain in my New Testament, and though all pope-donkeys should get furious and foolish, they shall not get the word out.” In some German editions the word “allein” was printed in larger type!”


stpaul.jpg
St. Paul, in discussing the basis for our judgment by God on the last day, says in Romans 2:6 that “God will give to each person according to his works.” The passage in its context is given below:


6God “will give to each person according to his works.” 7To those who by persistence in good works seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. 8But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. 9There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; 10but glory, honor and peace for everyone who works for the good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. 11For God does not show favoritism.


Interestingly enough, in both the Letter of James 2:14-26 and at Romans 2:6-11, the New International Version, a translation done by evangelical Protestant scholars in the 1970’s and the most popular translation of the Bible in the United States today, does not consistently translate the Greek word erga as “works,” as I’ve done above. More often than not, the word is translated as “deeds” or by the phrase “by what he has done.” In effect, this ideological bias in translation downplays the close connection between faith and works drawn by both the apostles James and Paul.


Do Orthodox Christians believe that we’re saved by grace through faith? Yes, of course we do! St. Paul says so in his Letter to the Ephesians 2:4, 8-9. But we do not separate faith and works. Notice that even here, where St. Paul says that we are “saved by grace,” he goes on to say that “we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works.” As is so often the case, we need to read the rest of the passage.

Faith Alone and Faith and Works in the Scriptures An Orthodox Christian Approach | A Russian Orthodox Church Website

and

Justification by Faith Alone? The Reply of Patriarch Jeremiah II to the Lutheran Tübingen Theologians

Orthodox View of Salvation by Faith Alone Doctrine
 

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,522
17,194
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You're welcome! :)

If you seek to obey the law in the hopes of being justified by God, then it would seem to me that your hope of being justified does not rest solely and squarely on your faith in Jesus Christ.

It seems to me that Romans 2:13 is saying that, while we are justified through faith in Christ, those who have faith in Christ will also be sanctified...and therefore they will not be violators of the law.

In bearing the fruit of the Spirit, there is no law that condemns their behaviour....which means that they do not violate the law...because of bearing the fruit of the Spirit. Another way of putting this is to say that the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in those who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit.

But we receive the Spirit in the first place through faith in Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:14)...so walking in the Spirit is the result of faith.

It is not that we look to obey a set of do's and don'ts in order to be justified...the venue by which we obtain the righteousness of God is through faith, apart from the law...while the law and the prophets attest to the fact that it is righteousness indeed (Romans 3:21).

Again, we obtain this righteousness through faith in Jesus through whom we receive the Spirit...and through the Spirit we bear the fruit of the Spirit; against which there is no law (Galatians 5:22-23).
I love Jesus and know that he lives, perhaps I'm beyond faith. John 14:15. Jesus to me is a knowledge not a hope. I have knowledge that he lives thru communion.
 

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,522
17,194
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Nope. No one has seen God and lived, your never beyond faith
Yes I know the scriptures, I have seen the Father, from a great distance beyond the stars. Many saw Jesus and he is God. And that scripture is 2000 years old. And they all saw the form of a dove descend on Jesus of the Holy Ghost. I think you just are doubting me.
 

mjrhealth

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2009
11,810
4,090
113
Australia
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I have faith God won't drop me, and hope he will resurrect me, but I've seen God so in that I'm beyond faith.
Its called knowing

Php_3:10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
 
  • Like
Reactions: dev553344

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you need the bible to point people to Christ than you dont know Him, not one bit. You have totally missed the whole thing,

The scriptures don't testify of Christ?

I don't need the Bible to be able to testify of Christ; but it is a useful tool in leading people to Christ.

Heb 4:12, For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
 

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Only those that obey Acts 2:38 are justified by faith per Romans.

Sinners that skip Acts do not qualify.
Peter was talking to Israel only:
Acts 2:22 KJV - Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
Acts 2:38 KJV - Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Peter was talking to Israel only:
Acts 2:22 KJV - Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
Acts 2:38 KJV - Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
You want to gamble your eternity on that statement?
 

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I reject the evangelical/Protestant doctrine of Faith alone. There is no alone in the Bible and when Luther translated his bible he added the word alone, that word was never there to begin with and since then evangelicals has believed in false things. We are saved by God's Grace, without which no Salvation is possible. I probably have not explained it good but I found some articles which one I quote here:



Faith Alone and Faith and Works in the Scriptures An Orthodox Christian Approach | A Russian Orthodox Church Website

and

Justification by Faith Alone? The Reply of Patriarch Jeremiah II to the Lutheran Tübingen Theologians

Orthodox View of Salvation by Faith Alone Doctrine
If one says faith alone and scripture does not specifically state it, that does not negate that it is only by faith. Faith has to be placed in the right object...faith has to be placed in the gospel, in Christ and his death for our sins and resurrection for our justification, in his cross, and in his shed blood.
Below is just a few passages that does not say salvation unto eternal life is by anything other than faith:

Romans 1:17 KJV - For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
Romans 3:22 KJV - Even the righteousness of God [which is] by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
Romans 3:28 KJV - Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 5:1 KJV - Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
 
  • Like
Reactions: justbyfaith

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You want to gamble your eternity on that statement?
1 Corinthians 1:17 KJV - For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
Baptism is not in our gospel
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
1 Corinthians 1:17 KJV - For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
Baptism is not in our gospel

1Co 1:13, Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
1Co 1:14, I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
1Co 1:15, Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
1Co 1:16, And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
1Co 1:17, For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.


But do you not realize that many of the Corinthians were baptized when Paul preached to them (Acts of the Apostles 18:8)?

Paul just took the same tactic as concerning baptism that Jesus did in John 4:2.

For God didn't send Jesus to baptize, either.

Yet Jesus said,

Jhn 3:5, Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

So, it is not that Paul is saying here that baptism is unnecessary; it is saying that he merely did not do the baptizing himself (as did John the Baptist)
 
Last edited:

Truther

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2019
10,295
1,479
113
62
Lodi
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Peter was talking to Israel only:
Acts 2:22 KJV - Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
Acts 2:38 KJV - Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
So Acts 2:38 is for only Jews, not all that are afar of or as many as the Lord our God shall call?
 

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So Acts 2:38 is for only Jews, not all that are afar of or as many as the Lord our God shall call?
Acts 2:39 KJV - For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, [even] as many as the Lord our God shall call.
Those afar off are scattered Israel
 

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
1Co 1:13, Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
1Co 1:14, I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
1Co 1:15, Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
1Co 1:16, And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
1Co 1:17, For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.


But do you not realize that many of the Corinthians were baptized when Paul preached to them (Acts of the Apostles 18:8)?

Paul just took the same tactic as concerning baptism that Jesus did in John 4:2.

For God didn't send Jesus to baptize, either.

Yet Jesus said,

Jhn 3:5, Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

So, it is not that Paul is saying here that baptism is unnecessary; it is saying that he merely did not do the baptizing himself (as did John the Baptist)
John 4:2 KJV - (Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,)
There is no such verse to apply this to Paul
Paul said he did baptize
1 Corinthians 1:14 KJV - I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
1 Corinthians 1:16 KJV - And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
Paul said we have one baptism and that is of the Spirit:
Ephesians 4:5 KJV - One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
1 Corinthians 12:13 KJV - For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether [we be] Jews or Gentiles, whether [we be] bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
John 4:2 KJV - (Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,)
There is no such verse to apply this to Paul
Paul said he did baptize
1 Corinthians 1:14 KJV - I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
1 Corinthians 1:16 KJV - And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
Paul said we have one baptism and that is of the Spirit:
Ephesians 4:5 KJV - One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
1 Corinthians 12:13 KJV - For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether [we be] Jews or Gentiles, whether [we be] bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Paul baptized, in Corinth, Crispus, and Gaius, and Stephanas.

Nevertheless many were baptized in Corinth as the result of Paul's preaching (Acts of the Apostles 18:8).

Either that is a contradiction or else Paul did not baptize people himself but let his disciples do the baptizing.
 

Doug

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2018
1,452
327
83
south
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Paul baptized, in Corinth, Crispus, and Gaius, and Stephanas.

Nevertheless many were baptized in Corinth as the result of Paul's preaching (Acts of the Apostles 18:8).

Either that is a contradiction or else Paul did not baptize people himself but let his disciples do the baptizing.
Ok I see what you are saying.
Why did Paul baptize? Scripture does not say and neither can we....we can speculate that maybe it was to give none offence....those Paul first went to were Jews and baptism was commanded to them.
All I can say is Paul spoke of a spiritual baptism not a water baptism and water baptism is not commanded by him.