How 'good' would it be, really? Consider when a name is changed for a reason, God's reason. The first name given had a purpose as likely also did the second, but was there not also a message from God to be found in the change? Consider Jacob and Israel.
Jacob means "heel holder" or supplanter
Israel means "God prevails"
The following is something I first studied and wrote down many years ago. This version was my re-write from 2017 on another forum. I am not sure whether I have ever shared it here before:
Quite a long time ago now it caught my attention that after Jacob received his new name of Israel, much of the time in scripture he was still addressed by the name, Jacob. So I decided to count the number of Jacobs and the number of Israels in scripture. It amazed me that in spite of the change by God, the use of Jacob in the book of Genesis while he still lived was greater than the use of his new name of Israel. I did a quick search in my computer which has tons of my writings and studies over the years, but was unable to find my early results. So I counted them again using both my computer program and my hardback Strong's. I used only the King James Version for the counts. The computer alone is able in my program to provide a chapter total: no partial chapters so I had to do some manual counting.]
Jacob was first mentioned in Gen 25:26. Jacob was last mentioned in Gen 50:24.
Israel was first mentioned in Gen 32:28. Israel was last mentioned in Gen 50:25
The word Jacob was used 181 times in the whole Book of Genesis.
The word Jacob was used 70 times from Gen 32:28 to 50:26 when the other name had also been given.
The word Israel was used 40 times from Gen 32:28 to 50:26.
The word Jacob was used 196 times from Exodus to Revelation.
The word Israel was used 2533 times from Exodus to Revelation.
The word Jacob was used 377 times in the whole Bible.
The word Israel was used 2576 times in the whole Bible.
The reason I separated from the rest of the Bible in my counts is that the man, Jacob/Israel, died in the Book of Genesis.
It had occurred to me the first time I studied this thing as it does now [now was 2017] that in spite of a glorious reason for giving the new name the old name was used so much more while the man still lived. Could it be that God realized that the man in spite of a notable promise of things to come was still so much in his old nature rather than the new throughout most of his life even after receiving the new name? Thus in the inspiration given to the writers, Jacob still was dominant while he drew natural breath, at least until toward the end. Only after his death did the name of Israel prevail so heavily against Jacob and then most of the time it was referring to a nation rather than a single man.
It does provide food for thought, doesn't it?