You continue to flounder around in your confusion. But the Bible is crystal clear.
1. The New Covenant has replaced the Old Covenant.
2. The New Covenant applies to BOTH the Church and redeemed and restored Israel in the future (after the Second Coming of Christ).
3. Israel is presently judicially blind because the Jews have largely rejected their true Messiah (Jesus of Nazareth).
4. God has a distinct eternal plan and purpose for the Church (the Body of Christ, which includes both Jews and Gentiles).
5. God also has a distinct eternal plan and purpose for redeemed and restored Israel (the twelve tribes) ON EARTH for eternity.
6. God's plan for Israel will go into effect only after the Second Coming of Christ. See the prophecy of Ezekiel (and many others).
7. During the Church Age, God makes no distinction between Jews and Gentile, and all are commanded to repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Thanks, now we see a crystal clear division of thought, I floundering, you traditional.
Naturally genetic and nationally bred Israel after the flesh (not floundering here, just enhancing the term) will be reinstated to the prietshood of God by Lord Jesus in a newly rebuilt temple under Old Covenant offerings? (Ezekiel 40-48)
Then To disagree with this traditional teaching would mean Ezek 40-48 is either:
1. False
2. A Traditional Teaching and interpretation that is either false or erroneous in part
3. Is Permanently Unfulfilled
No Scripture is ever 'false' nor 'contradictory' with another Scripture.
Traditional teachings aren't as destructive as traditions and commandments of men, but are always suspect by me, until Scripture proves it. I am Berean to the soul. Therefore:
1. Reinstating burnt offerings and sacrifices by the Lord for national Israel (Ezek 40,43-45) is contrary to (Heb 10:5-9). When Jesus came into the world, God said He would not have sacrifice and offerings by the Law, because he had not pleasure in them before. Paul confirms He is speaking of taking away the 1st Covenant, that He may establish the 2nd.
2. These burnt offerings will not be for remembrance of Jesus' sacrifice but for sins at the time. (Ezek 44:11, 45:15-17) This 'remembrance theology' is constructed without Scripture slip around (Heb 10). The remembrance of Jesus' death will be the eternal prints in His hands, and spear mark in His side. (John 20:27, Rev 5:6)
3. Ezek 44:9 declares that
no stranger, nor uncircumcised of heart...shall enter into this visionary temple of the Lord's reign on earth. While God called upon His old Israel to circumcise their hearts, such circumcision
now and in future can only be accomplished for God by His Spirit in the New Covenant of Jesus. I.e. No more need for the above sacrifices for sin.
Therefore, the visionary temple God showed to Ezekiel CANNOT be after the New Covenant. Not with sacrifices by the Law, which only
was of Moses, nor with circumcision of the heart, which only
is by the Spirit in the New Covenant. (Circumcision of heart by man's own will of purpose, without the blood of Jesus is now called will worship (Col 2:23))
4) 4) Ezekiel 40:4 and 43:9 was a visionary hope for nature's Israel in captivity,
if they would put away their abominations. (Ezek 44:7,13) Jesus was sent by God
expressly to confirm that hope, along with all the promises of God to the fathers (Rom 10:20). If Israel had as a nation received Him, instead of having Him crucified, then Jesus as Messiah would have fulfilled the vision as shown. They did not. (I John)
The prophetic vision of Ezek 40-48 to fleshy natural Israel was a promise made,
if they did not
fail to believe. They did fail. No fulfillment as envisioned by God.
5) God has done away with and annulled His First
everlasting priesthood (Ex 40:15), statute (Lev 16:34), and Covenant (1 Chron 16:17), which was made solely with carnal Israel. That which God declared to be everlasting, was conditioned
always on the big IF. And so, that which God showed to be in future (to that same carnal and rebellious people) will not be fulfilled, due to their unbelief in His Son,
not by God's breaking of His own Word.
Now, will there be a Temple of God on earth, wherein Jesus reigns over the earth? Sure. But not made with hands serving in a priesthood and covenant that no longer exists, because it is no longer
necessary. (And I really don't think the Lord would do it just for old time's sake.) I would say the Temple of God, which is in heaven, and one day will be seen in heaven, could be a good contender. It has the ark and everything. (Rev 11:19).