The Atonement misnomer of Sufficient for all, efficient for some

[ChristisGod]

Very well presented, being both spiritually and scripturally accurate, according to God the Father and God the Son, who together are One in Holy Spirit.

Many forget or are ignorant of the fact, that God the Father required the sacrificial death of His Eternal Son for His ownself, just as much as we do. Otherwise, He never would have been able to permanently dwell within us through His Son*, which is the primary reason for our creation in the first place.

Thanks be to God that we are not left to the judgment of Adam of eternal death, but now through faith in the judgment of Christ, we are free to partake in His resurrection unto eternal life.
John 3:18, 1 John 5:12-13.
*Heb. 10:20

I just posted my "thesis " paper where the OP came from where you can see the "context" it came from. I would appreciate your thoughts/insights both positive and negative. It will be a paper I will continue to develop and add or take away from as I continue with my studies on the topic of the atonement. Thanks !

 

[Rightglory]

PSA stands for the penal substitution theory of the atonement.

Thanks. The atonement view developed by Anselm and Abelard in the 11th century. It is a view that the Roman Catholics accepted and was carried over by all the Reformers.
I hold to the Christus Victor view.

 

[ChristisGod]

Thanks. The atonement view developed by Anselm and Abelard in the 11th century. It is a view that the Roman Catholics accepted and was carried over by all the Reformers.
I hold to the Christus Victor view.

I like that view and the PSA without the penal aspect.