- Sep 17, 2019
- 1,204
- 1,133
- 113
- 63
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Someone quoted the Book of Jasher on another thread. What church considers it to be canon?
non inspired book!Someone quoted the Book of Jasher on another thread. What church considers it to be canon?
No congregation of Ekklesia that I have ever heard of,Someone quoted the Book of Jasher on another thread. What church considers it to be canon?
Someone quoted the Book of Jasher on another thread. What church considers it to be canon?
I don't need the Book of Jasher to tell me that. Genesis makes that clear. Jacob only took advantage of Esau's disregard (with God's blessing). Jacob was an opportunist. His oft-repeated epithet, "supplanter" is synonymous with the modern English, "underhanded."You were suggesting that Jacob had stolen Esau's birth right whereas the Genesis' account suggests that Esau had no regard for his birthright.
As posted before - "supplanter" is accurate - modern English word "underhanded " is not accurate and actually isI don't need the Book of Jasher to tell me that. Genesis makes that clear. Jacob only took advantage of Esau's disregard (with God's blessing). Jacob was an opportunist. His oft-repeated epithet, "supplanter" is synonymous with the modern English, "underhanded."
I don't need the Book of Jasher to tell me that. Genesis makes that clear. Jacob only took advantage of Esau's disregard (with God's blessing). Jacob was an opportunist. His oft-repeated epithet, "supplanter" is synonymous with the modern English, "underhanded."
It is actually mentioned twice in the OT.
The Book of Jasher was a part of the oral tradition of the Israelites of the early history of the earth and Israel. It provides a back story for the parts that Moses did not record in the Book of Genesis etc..
Addressing the OP TOPIC.
it's amazing how people want to read another book when they have not mastered 1 (ONE), not one of the 66 book before them.
PICJAG.
@Mosheli It's good not to put too much credence on writings which are not canonical and inspired.The extant "Book of Jashar" is not the same as the Book of Jashar mentioned in the Old Testament, it is only a later rabbinic work. It is not regarded as canonical by any mainstream christian churches. It is useful as a scholarly reference but is not necessarily historically reliable.
Why do you bother to read our posts when you could be reading your Bible?Addressing the OP TOPIC.
it's amazing how people want to read another book when they have not mastered 1 (ONE), not one of the 66 book before them.
PICJAG.
Jesus said the same thing, in perspective of Perfect Truth: My sheep Hear MY Voice (ONE) and Follow Me , and will not follow another.Addressing the OP TOPIC.
it's amazing how people want to read another book when they have not mastered 1 (ONE), not one of the 66 book before them.
I didn't read your post...Why do you bother to read our posts when you could be reading your Bible?
Correct, and many are not even hearing the one voice.Jesus said the same thing, in perspective of Perfect Truth: My sheep Hear MY Voice (ONE) and Follow Me , and will not follow another.
So why do you come here to read people's posts?I didn't read your post...
and from some of your posts I see many of you haven't read many of the book in your own bibles.
PICJAG.