Revelation 6:2 "And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer."
The rider of this white horse is Satan, in the role of the Antichrist. Satan will come first as the fake Christ, the Antichrist and he will ride and conquer the people of the entire earth.
Absolutely not! You are reading "fake Christ" into verse. The symbol of the horse is strength of battle, and the color white is of purity and righteousness. Thus this horse symbolizes God's righteousness as He goes forth with strength conquering and
to conquer. Overcoming, and
to overcome. Satan does not qualify because he cannot permanently conquer or overcome in righteousness. I don't believe that Satan could ever be symbolized in God's Word "
as" a rider of a White horse at all. At best he could come "looking like" a righteous rider, but the verse does not say this because he never actually riding a white horse. This horse "
is" a white horse. Christ! Which to me means the rider is riding in strength and righteousness to conquer. But why some people want to believe in their own speculations?
Job 6:26
- "Do ye imagine to reprove words, and the speeches of one that is desperate, which are as wind?"
..Good question.
Selah!
We see the first seal in detail in the 9th chapter. It takes place after the fifth trumpet sounds, Satan is the first “morning star” to come.
Huh? Hold on a minute.
Show me the Scripture where Satan is identified as the Morning Star. I want chapter and verse—not speculation, not imaginative connections, and certainly not a prophetic theory imposed upon the text.
Revelation 22:16 explicitly identifies Jesus Christ as “the bright and morning star.” Meanwhile, Isaiah 14:12 uses the expression “Lucifer, son of the morning” in a passage addressing the king of Babylon. Where, exactly, does Scripture identify Satan as "
the" Morning Star in the sense you are claiming?
You are making a serious theological assertion by connecting Satan to the first seal and then calling him the Morning Star.
The burden is on you to demonstrate that interpretation from Scripture, not merely assert it as though it were an established biblical fact.
So, please, show us the actual passage that supports your claim. Let Scripture speak for itself. We do not need to invent identities and prophetic connections that the text itself does not establish.
This event will catch many Christians off-guard, for many tie themselves to the '"rapture doctrine" and will worship the Antichrist as the true Christ in ignorance. This is why the rapture doctrine is so dangerous—it ties its followers to the first Christ to come, who is the Antichrist!
Of course, the pretribulation rapture doctrine is dangerous. But so is your post-tribulation rapture doctrine! You may disagree about
when the rapture occurs, but you are still operating under the same umbrella of premillennialism, sharing many of the same underlying assumptions about end-time events!
You argue that pretribulationists are in danger of being deceived by the Antichrist, yet you seem oblivious to the fact that your own post-tribulation framework shares much of the same prophetic system! You still have the same obsession with a future Antichrist, a literal seven-year tribulation, a physical world government, a physical mark of the beast, and a literal, earthly millennial kingdom.
Apparently, moving the rapture from before the tribulation to after it somehow makes the rest of the prophetic system correct? Oh please! That is quite a convenient way to avoid questioning the very assumptions you share with those you criticize!
The real issue is not merely
when someone believes the rapture occurs.
The deeper question is whether the entire prophetic framework is biblical in the first place. You can argue over the timing all day long, but if your
foundational interpretation is mistaken, changing the rapture's schedule will not fix it. Sorry to disappoint you.
Perhaps instead of warning others about deception, you should first examine whether you have inherited the same premillennial assumptions you believe you have escaped. Scripture must judge our prophetic systems—not the other way around.
Different rapture schedules, same premillennial umbrella. Changing the timing does not automatically correct the theology.
Selah!
Here is the true MESSIAH riding in:
Revelation 19:11-16 (NKJV) 11 Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him [was] called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12 His eyes [were] like a flame of fire, and on His head [were] many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13 He [was] clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. 15 Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. 16 And He has on [His] robe and on His thigh a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.
Amen! The same is true of the White Horse in Revelation 6! He has been riding forth since Pentecost, advancing the gospel and conquering hearts through the power of His Word.
It is the same White Horse and the same victorious King!
He began with ONE crown, signifying His kingship and authority established through His victory at the Cross. But in Revelation 19, He appears wearing many crowns, displaying His supreme authority as King of kings and Lord of lords. Those many crowns also remind us of the crowns His redeemed people will cast before Him, acknowledging that all honor, glory, and victory belong to Him alone!
He conquers, and He continues to conquer, spoiling His Elect from the kingdom of darkness. His kingdom advances, His elect are gathered, and His victory is made manifest through the preaching of the gospel. All glory belongs to Christ, the victorious King!
Selah!