Yes you are right. But I’m welcome to read and study other passages that people submit that believe upholds their doctrine. Only through diligent comparison can you come to the truth. Truth does not contradict itself. But that is what you usually find....contradiction. That’s why I want to study it. The problem is...few people ever do that. Many just want to tell me how I’m wasting their time and everybody knows none of this matters we are saved by faith and that’s it. It’s all been settled why continue to try....blah blah. That is what I get. How can anyone have a constructive study if you are not willing to study verse for verse.I cannot cut and paste individual points as I have to get ready for work shortly, and my IPad is horrible for cutting and pasting !
I think we have different approaches to study- you state that you want people to look at what you write and ' see if they agree, and if not break and down as to why ' yes that is study, but you go on to clearly state that ' what you believe is true ' - so that shows, or relays, that your mind is already made up on the subject of baptism. Am I right ?
You believe baptism does t save? Then what scripture do you use to support that?
You believe repentance is unnecessary? Then what do you use to support that.
You believe the gospel only includes the death,burial, and resurrection of Jesus? Then what passages do you appeal to for support?
If you don’t have any then that’s a problem.
Faith comes by hearing and hearing from the word of God. Rom 10:17
This is how you study the Bible.
The Bereans were more noble because they didn’t just take Paul’s word for it, they....
Searched the scriptures daily to find out if what Paul was saying was right. Acts 17:11
The thread is not about baptism. The great commission includes repentance plus other items. I don’t think I have seen one person even mention the word repentance in days. All people want to talk about is faith/belief as if that is ALL there is to being a Christian. And all they want to do is bash baptism in water as if the devil himself came up with the idea. I’m sorry but I’m amazed by the reactions I get to plain and clear passages of scripture. Acts 22:16 is one if the clearest passages in all of the NT and I get it from all sides.So , from the readers point of view, your aim is to challenge them to understand why you believe what you believe, despite the fact that you have already done that in other threads. I know from your other threads that you believe baptism saves- so my point is ' why start another thread that covers the same subject and repeats all the same arguments again '
You will gain more of my understanding through reading my reply to you in post 40I have apologised in my previous post - I did single you out , and that was wrong.
I just don't get why so many seem to think that the more they say something, the more likely it is to be heard. I guess it's the repedative subject matter that has been frustrating me.
It's true I don't believe baptism saves , but then to be honest it's NEVER been something I have ever heard before In my entire Christian life, baptism was never discussed when I first came to faith, and yet it was something I did because I felt led to , but there was a gap of about a year- but it doesn't mean that I was not saved in that first year. You do not believe in the works of the HS outside of Gods word, but my own experiences are different - it doesn't mean you are not a Christian, or I am not a Christian, it just means we see things differently. It's not always about being right or wrong.
I am just perpetuating this, and that was not my intention- I have to go to work X
Rita