Davy
Well-Known Member
Even Larkin admits it.
You're starting to sound like that old record again, noise without saying anything.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Even Larkin admits it.
If Larkin says it, that's good enough for me.You're starting to sound like that old record again, noise without saying anything.
One doesn't have to be a Jesuit to make a distinction between Israel and the church in Scripture, between the aspect of the Lord's coming that relates to the coming of the Lord Jesus for his church (John 14; 1 Thessalonians 4) and the aspect that relates to His coming in power and judgment.
If Larkin says it, that's good enough for me.
He was terribly confused and his charts prove it. Amillenialism has only one second coming, not three.Refer to his charts then, maybe you'll believe them too.
He was terribly confused and his charts prove it. Amillenialism has only one second coming, not three.
Amillennialism is the official position of the Nicene creed. "and He shall come again, with glory, to judge both the living and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end."The 1st century Church fathers not associated with the Alexandria school, were Premillennialists.
Amillennialism came from the Gnotics in the Alexandria school, like Origen and Clement. They were subjected to Neo-Platonism.
Look at those passages, Sir. Where do you see the power and glory and judgment aspects of the Lord's coming in those passages? which very evident in other passages in both the Old and New Testaments.A statement without... Biblical proof. Beau coup number of times those kind of statements are made here on forums like this.
Oh so those who believe in the Trinity as Biblical have supposedly got to reject the dispensational distinctions? :)Amillennialism is the official position of the Nicene creed. "and He shall come again, with glory, to judge both the living and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end."
Even Larkin admits it.
Amillennialism is the backbone of Christian eschatology.Oh so those who believe in the Trinity as Biblical have supposedly got to reject the dispensational distinctions? :)
Margaret MacDonald did while hallucinating from a serious fever when she was 14. The Dispies lapped it up.Does not change the reality that the Jesuits did not invent pre-tribulation rapture.
Amillennialism is the official position of the Nicene creed. "and He shall come again, with glory, to judge both the living and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end."
Amillennialism is creedal where it counts. The rest isn't.1st century Church fathers were Premillennialists.
The heretic Marcion was one of the earliest fathers of Amillennialism.
Pre trib Rapture = Margaret; futurism = Irenaeus and HippolytusThose who associate hallucinators like Margaret McDonald with the 1st century Church fathers like Irenaeus and Hippolytus who both held to a Pre-millennial return of Jesus, are like the old Pharisees who seek to hide the Truth.
Look at those passages, Sir. Where do you see the power and glory and judgment aspects of the Lord's coming in those passages? which very evident in other passages in both the Old and New Testaments.
Pre trib Rapture = Margaret; futurism = Irenaeus and Hippolytus