Philip James
Well-Known Member
And don't think that because scripture says she brought forth a child we recognise as the Son, Jesus, that means ' oh, it must be Mary'. Not necessarily.
?? Did someone else give birth to Jesus? How can it not be Mary?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And don't think that because scripture says she brought forth a child we recognise as the Son, Jesus, that means ' oh, it must be Mary'. Not necessarily.
It has not passed my attention that you have not answered brakelite's question, 'show from scripture that that woman is Mary.'I think you have a sex problem because you see whores everywhere.
The information of what Catholics believe is available to anyone who wants to know. You don't want to know. You can bait BofL, but you won't bait me. The fact that you deny the Trinity renders you incompetent to prove or disprove anything from Scripture.
The Assumption can easily be reconciled with Scripture because it is not contrary to it in any way. The premise that all Christian doctrines must appear in Scripture in order to be accepted cannot itself be found anywhere in Scripture. Catholics agree that no Christian teaching can contradict anything in the Bible. The Assumption of Mary is a belief of this sort.
Mary’s Assumption: Brief Explanation, with a New (?) Biblical Parallel [3-1-07]
Mary’s Assumption vs. Material Sufficiency of Scripture? [4-22-07]
11 Bible Passages & Mary’s Assumption [2009]
Defending Mary (Revelation 12 & Her Assumption) [5-28-12]
Is Mary’s Assumption Able to be Inferred from Scripture Alone? [8-14-15]
Bible on Mary’s Assumption [2015]
Mary’s Death Before Her Assumption: Required Belief? [2-27-17]
*
“Armstrong vs. Geisler” #7: Mary’s Assumption [3-1-17]
*
Armstrong vs. Collins & Walls #6: Assumption, Queen Redux [10-19-17]
*
Biblical Arguments in Support of Mary’s Assumption [National Catholic Register, 8-15-18]
Understanding Catholic Mariology takes study, prayer, and humble submission before God. If you can't be bothered finding out what Catholics REALLY believe about Mary, then I can't be bothered enabling you to throw poop on Jesus' mother, which is what you do.
The people of faith (God's people/ God's Church) are represented by the chaste woman in Rev.12.?? Did someone else give birth to Jesus? How can it not be Mary?
The people of faith (God's people/ God's Church) are represented by the chaste woman in Rev.12.
There is a difference between the symbol (the woman of Rev.12) being the collective of God's people and the individual Mary. The intent of the prophecy is not to highlight Mary as an individual but rather to make it clear that Jesus came from the progeny of faith.I agree, which is why we see Mary as an icon of the Church.
Note she is not just the mother of Jesus but also 'the rest of her offspring, those who keep God's commandments and bear witness to Jesus.'
so then she is both the icon of, and the mother of, the Church.
Peace be with you!
Mother Mary, pray for us!
WRONG.It has not passed my attention that you have not answered brakelite's question, 'show from scripture that that woman is Mary.'
What I have noticed is the attempt to snow the question.
There is a difference between the symbol (the woman of Rev.12) being the collective of God's people and the individual Mary
I would say you are superimposing Mary upon the text.....why? because Mary is not the subject matter of the prophecy.Do you not see? Mary is the symbol of 'the collective of God's people'. Your refusal to acknowledge that distorts your understanding..
Are you serious? Rev 12:5 says the woman "bore a male Child who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron. And her Child was caught up to God and His throne.". This male child is obviously Jesus.show from scripture that that woman is Mary.
Wow, talk about denying the words of scripture. Not a great recipe for arriving at the truth.And don't think that because scripture says she brought forth a child we recognise as the Son, Jesus, that means ' oh, it must be Mary'. Not necessarily. Revelation 12 is prophetic. It is filled with symbolism
The "women" has three identities, but all the descriptors need not apply to each identity. For example, the whole description doesn't apply to Mary, yet Mary is obviously identified in the mix.I would be very interested in knowing the specific identity of the woman in Revelation 18?
So is Israel and so is Mary.The people of faith (God's people/ God's Church) are represented by the chaste woman in Rev.12.
The woman is described as giving birth to Jesus. Who gave birth to Jesus? You only get one guess.There is a difference between the symbol (the woman of Rev.12) being the collective of God's people and the individual Mary. The intent of the prophecy is not to highlight Mary as an individual but rather to make it clear that Jesus came from the progeny of faith.
The same principle applies to the unchaste woman of Rev.18
I would say you are afraid that woman can be Mary and that therefore the Catholic Church is right.I would say you are superimposing Mary upon the text.....why? because Mary is not the subject matter of the prophecy.
No, he doesn't see - he's afraid to open his eyes and mind to the truth.Do you not see? Mary is the symbol of 'the collective of God's people'. Your refusal to acknowledge that distorts your understanding..
@Brakelite2 He is right, the problem is he doesnt see is that all mens religions including his, are daughters of the whore,I think you have a sex problem because you see whores everywhere.
All of themWhich Catholic doctrines are “pulled out of thin air”?