BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
I think when we read Jesus telling his Apostles his law yet again,and then stating,if they love him keep his commands, we know God's law still holds in a new covenant. As Jesus reiterated.Anyone with access to the Bible can read God’s law, so pretending it isn’t there won’t make it go away. It is one thing for there to be no wrath for when someone sins while being ignorant of God’s law against it and it is another thing for someone to deliberately rebel against God’s law.
When we read those who insist that teaching of Jesus no longer holds,I think we need to consider the import of such an absurd rebuke of Christ's authority.
Because the Gospel and his laws are inextricably linked.
What's noticable in the collective that rebukes the laws of Christ,when he was God in the flesh, I think, is how anti they really are.
The same people who insist the Sabbath does not exist for Christians,are typically the same ones who insist eternal irrevocable Salvation is false doctrine. They also insist,boldly contrary to what is written in scripture in any version, that God's Elect is a description referring to those who Elect to follow Christ.
The veneer sometimes donned on this consistent rhetoric of those described is to invoke as their "reasoning" for their (false) perspective is that those not on accord are advocating Calvinism.
Which in fact is something they rarely know anything about.
In short the consistent thread within that collective is to openly deny Christ and his purpose and actual message.
Anti-Gospel,Anti-Jesus.
They think it isn't obvious. In fact it is impossible to miss.