I know you are reasonably intelligent, which is why I invited you onto this thread. So I can only presume that for some reason you are being deliberately dense. And while you are adjusting your attitude, I would prefer it if you stopped with the insults. They make it difficult for me to understand if you a making some salient point or just looking for an excuse to be rude.
You are just making things up and trying to hide behind an emotional shield. I have not insulted you in any way and you seem to define "rude" simply as something you cant "word" yourself around.
I have spoken clearly and concisely on this as both a Professional Engineer and Soldier who has actually "been there and done that" and an MBA/Project Manager with the history to back it up.
What I did is challenged your nebulous emotionally charged Marxist points ( and they are all straight from the playbook) with factual, reasonable and very specific qualifiers to both expose them for what they are and to specifically and exactly nail down critical points for any "legitimate" attempt at formulating a resolution.
What do you feel I have been "dense" at? (be specific)
My "salient points" were qualifying and quantifying every nebulous point you brought up.
Show me "rudeness and insult"? (be specific)
Of course wealth isn't bad. In fact, it's so good I want everyone to have some.
Then build the infrastructure where they can go
EARN IT like the rest of us had to do.
But then there's that obstacle of the governments who by hook or crook are keeping their people in poverty- what's your plan to deal with that?
What is your plan to deal with the lazy and unmotivated?
Everybody is not a "poor victim" needing help. What's your plan to separate and identify the genuine?
Anyone who wants to discuss any LEGITIMATE effort to help these poor people will have to address all of these key points in great detail.
Now you can start and I'm here to help.