I do get that... I get that you don't take any scripture lightly and I commend you for that. I don't neccesarily understand all of your point of view, but then again I am a pretty unique individual on this board. I am not one who believes in the trinitarian theory or traditional rapture theory. I see heavy influences of both in your doctrine. So yea.. I have a different point of view.
Again, i want to say this was one of 5 points of contention you put forth. I commented on three and you commented only on one.
FHII:
Let me be careful and answer the last one I believe you spoke of, 2 Tim 3:15 as I previously addressed the OP of 2 Tm 3:16-17 and said it was not specifically speaking of Christ, ok?
here are the verses plus:
(2Ti 3:12) Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted,
(2Ti 3:13) while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.
(2Ti 3:14) But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it
(2Ti 3:15) and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.
(2Ti 3:16) All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
(2Ti 3:17) that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (All ESV)
I want to go back to verse 12 thru verse 17 to capture the entire thought..
Paul is desperate to know that the believers in his midst are well-equipped with all the words of God or scripture (some written down and some spoken to them at that time) both OT and NT scripture, the gospel that brought them salvation through faith, as hard and difficult times are coming upon them.
Paul wanted to tell them to keep using scripture, as maybe their lives depended on it, the inspired words (plural) of God, with the end goal of being an effective tool for performing God's will even through hard and deceptive times.
Now my previous answer to the OP was only for verse 16 and 17. The suggestion by the OP that by substituting in Jesus for the word, God, in verse 16 makes Paul's intent clear is nonsense. It causes utter confusion.
Paul is speaking of the words, plural, as in words that form statements and sentences that communicate etc. verse 16 should not be tampered with by interchanging God for the word, Jesus.
Yes, you are correct when you say that verse 15 is directly related to Jesus. He is related because the words (Plural again) speak of how to be saved and how to continue in faith..etc... But the OP saying in the next verse (16) that Jesus is profitable etc is nonsense to even an atheist linguistics or language expert perspective.
I hope I answered your last query completely for you. Let me know.
Oh, I'm not the rapture type in any way shape of form. It is a 19th century invention as it ran in parallel when modern Zionist was conceived.
And if this OP is an example of some type of trinity support then it has a new extreme meaning. I'm not a true fan of it anyway. It does not work (does not live up to scriptural scrutiny). It was an attempt to describe God Almighty on terms with the Jesus, and they never did have a handle of what the spirit really was all about. It was conceived from a pagan view point. They should update it and think ahead of what Jesus is like right now in the heavens, and what the saints will be like and how they will communicate with Jesus in the heavens. Hint: Jesus is not God almighty right now or ever has been, he is like an super-powerful angel. It is found in the scriptures. We will be like Jesus. Now how does the pagan-derived trinity model stack up to this reality? It cannot...
I used to be a Catholic once and I never was taught it anyway. Maybe I was one of a few living, that was never exposed to it, in New Zealand at that time. I never did pay much attention to the creed(s) as well. They seems to be 'off a bit.'
I remember at middle school, a nun (school teacher type) looked directly at me and said (my name) what does Genesis 1:1 say, in front of the entire class. I answered correctly word for word. It had to be word for word correct. I was never told that it was really Jesus that created everything.
Bless you,
APAK