Thoughts about using a KJV update?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Would you use a KJV update?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 19.4%
  • No

    Votes: 19 52.8%
  • Probably

    Votes: 4 11.1%
  • Probably not

    Votes: 5 13.9%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Total voters
    36

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Actually my point is that no one agrees on what a liberal is.

Seeing you don’t accept definitions in a dictionary, I don’t have much confidence in your understanding on this topic.
Generally there are beliefs that makes a person fall into the liberal camp. Like I said, you can Google it and research it for yourself.
I don’t have to convince you. The information is out there.

You said:
I see the best example and simplest as the beliefs and initiatives of the democrat party. As far as Christian liberals....those that believe in gay marriage...abortions etc

There are different degrees or types of liberals. Certain beliefs fall into the liberal camp. Again, I would encourage you to read the article here at Wikipedia.

Liberal Christianity - Wikipedia

They mention how Christian liberals accept Evolution, etcetera.

You said:
Again false accusations.....The Bible is the foundation of Christian beliefs....

But you don’t make it your foundation because you reject certain things in the Bible like Luke 14:26, Revelation 6:13, and the existence of witchcraft mentioned in the Bible.
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
11,247
5,323
113
66
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Again, I ask you: Do you believe a person who is into witchcraft can be continue to be saved after they accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior, and they continue to practice their witchcraft or dark arts? A simple “yes” or “no” is all I am looking for here.

No. The translators do not agree with you. Most of all your Modern Translations (that come from translators) say this for Luke 14:26:

Again, to I have to repeat myself over and over again....witches and witchcraft can not be discussed in the Bibles because those words did not exist yet. Most of the false beliefs in Christianity is cause by using words that were not in that time period...Words that had definitions that do not fit what is going on in the Bible or the theology of the Bible and these word override what is actually there. This one caused millions of death at the hands of the Church. Atrocities so heinous that you cannot speak of them.

Mediums and those that worked rituals fall in the category of sorcerers. But the Bible is not going to discuss Satan worship or Satan sorcerers....by name. There are discussions of Pagan gods....and false gods. We can assume that there were devil worshippers, that is it. Today you have witches! You have devil witches and nature witches.


Again, I ask you: Do you believe a person who is into witchcraft can be continue to be saved after they accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior, and they continue to practice their witchcraft or dark arts? A simple “yes” or “no” is all I am looking for here.

No

So you agree with me that it says hate....good we are done. Good-bye
 
Last edited:

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Post #541 within this thread.



So you ignore the different meanings in the 1913 Webster’s dictionary.
So it seems you just make the Bible and the dictionary mean whatever you want it to mean.
You are living in fantasy world.



A quick reply in one or two sentences on your position on this matter is all I am looking for.
But you suggest that witchcraft is not discussed in the Bible? This again shows your lack of either not reading the Bible or understanding it.

Bible Verses About Witchcraft

Again, I ask you: Do you believe a person who is into witchcraft can be continue to be saved after they accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior, and they continue to practice their witchcraft or dark arts? A simple “yes” or “no” is all I am looking for here.



No. The translators do not agree with you. Most of all your Modern Translations (that come from translators) say this for Luke 14:26:

full


Source:
Luke 14:26 "If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters--yes, even his own life--he cannot be My disciple.

Luke 14:26, KJV, "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple

So it seems you just make the Bible and the dictionary mean whatever you want it to mean. You are clearly, without question, living in fantasy world. Believe it or not, the truth didn't stop in 1611 (even though you think it did).

Do you hate your parents and your wife and your children and brothers and sisters and hate your life? If not, you're living contrary to God's Word.
 

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Again, to I have to repeat myself over and over again....witches and witchcraft can not be discussed in the Bibles because those words did not exist yet. Most of the false beliefs in Christianity is cause by using words that were not in that time period...Words that had definitions that do not fit what is going on in the Bible or the theology of the Bible and these word override what is actually there. This one caused millions of death at the hands of the Church. Atrocities so heinous that you cannot speak of them.

Mediums and those that worked rituals fall in the category of sorcerers. But the Bible is not going to discuss Satan worship or Satan sorcerers....by name. There are discussions of Pagan gods....and false gods. We can assume that there were devil worshippers, that is it. Today you have witches! You have devil witches and nature witches.

You can repeating yourself until the cows come home. It does not change anything. Your flawed opinions are not the Law or reality. The words “witch” and “witchcraft” are English translations of what the original languages say. Unless you think you are better than every other translator out there (that came before you), the word “witchcraft” is used even in Modern Bibles.

The word “witch” appears two times in the Bible (KJB).
The word “witchcraft” appears three times in the Bible (KJB).

There is only one category of witches in the Bible.
So natural witches and devil witches would both fall under the category of witches or witchcraft mentioned in the Bible.

So again, you don’t know what you are talking about.
In fact, if you were living in the mid 1600’s to mid 1800’s, we would not even being having this kind of discussion. You would most likely be either for the King James Bible or for another Textus Receptus Bible (Which is similar in wording).

You said:
So you agree with me that it says hate....good we are done. Good-bye

I agree that the Bible has homonyms in it, and hate is one of those homonyms. Try looking up what homonyms are, and then get back to me.
 
Last edited:

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
11,247
5,323
113
66
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The word “witch” appears two times in the Bible (KJB).
The word “witchcraft” appears three times in the Bible (KJB).

You see what I am saying....all of the time! It seems like every time....I am sure it is not, just a lot....Yes the word witch and witchcraft are in the KJV....but not in the scriptures. The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions. Good bye….Adiós….Arrivederci…. Auf Wiedersehen….Hasta la vista.
Go away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim B

Bible Highlighter

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2022
4,767
989
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You see what I am saying....all of the time! It seems like every time....I am sure it is not, just a lot....Yes the word witch and witchcraft are in the KJV....but not in the scriptures. The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions. Good bye….Adiós….Arrivederci…. Auf Wiedersehen….Hasta la vista.
Go away.

Last I checked the Holy Bible (the KJB) are the Scriptures. The burden of proof is on you to establish that the Bible is not Scripture.
But most Christians regard the Bible as Scripture (even those in the Textual Critic Camp). You are a liberal, and so you will of course reject that the KJB are the Scriptures. Liberals have always hated the King James Bible.

According to the Wikipedia Article on Liberal Christianity, it states, I quote:

“Liberal Christians rejected the doctrine of biblical inerrancy or infallibility, which they saw as the idolatry (fetishism) of the Bible.

Liberal theology grew out of Enlightenment rationalism and romanticism of the 18th and 19th centuries. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it was characterized by an acceptance of Darwinian evolution, a utilization of modern biblical criticism and participation in the Social Gospel movement.”​

So welcome to the Liberal Christian club. You are a Liberal Christian by the above stated beliefs that is commonly understood by a basic informational general website.

Article Source Quote:
Liberal Christianity - Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Baloney.

That’s just another tired rendering from another translation team with nothing better to do than to add yet another version to the huge pile of modern translations since last century.

Mere busy work.

Unfortunately they find an audience for their works…

An audience of intelligent, literate Christians who want to know what God's Word really says, instead of clinging to a 411-year-old political translation that they're duped into thinking is accurate.
 

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Last I checked the Holy Bible (the KJB) are the Scriptures. The burden of proof is on you to establish that the Bible is not Scripture.
But most Christians regard the Bible as Scripture (even those in the Textual Critic Camp). You are a liberal, and so you will of course reject that the KJB are the Scriptures. Liberals have always hated the King James Bible.

According to the Wikipedia Article on Liberal Christianity, it states, I quote:

“Liberal Christians rejected the doctrine of biblical inerrancy or infallibility, which they saw as the idolatry (fetishism) of the Bible.

Liberal theology grew out of Enlightenment rationalism and romanticism of the 18th and 19th centuries. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it was characterized by an acceptance of Darwinian evolution, a utilization of modern biblical criticism and participation in the Social Gospel movement.”​

So welcome to the Liberal Christian club. You are a Liberal Christian by the above stated beliefs that is commonly understood by a basic informational general website.

Article Source Quote:
Liberal Christianity - Wikipedia

Last I checked the Holy Bible (the KJB) are not the Scriptures. The burden of proof is on you to establish that the King James Bible is pure Scripture and other versions are not.
 

Behold

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2020
15,647
6,442
113
Netanya or Pensacola
Faith
Christian
Country
Israel
An audience of intelligent, literate Christians who want to know what God's Word really says, instead of clinging to a 411-year-old political translation that they're duped into thinking is accurate.

JimB,

Next you'll be telling us that the (30) Greek Text(s) is the "real bible" and everything else is a "version" that can't be trusted.
Or you'll be telling us something else you read online that convinced you that you needed to share it.

For me...
I use a few bibles, but i do use the KJV to filter out junk bibles like the NIV, for example.
And i can tell you something that is specific to the KJV, that is incomparable regarding any other "version".

Its this... and you can research it, Jim B, as this would give you something worthy of your time, vs, websites that want to spit on the KJV that have you trained to do the same.
It not a good idea to belong to the : "cult of KJV haters".

Here is the thing about the KJV..

In the history of the NT Church.......more people have been saved, under the preaching of the KJV, than all other "versions" combined.
Also...
More Preachers, Teachers, Evangelists, and Missionaries, have been called into the Ministry, under the preaching of the KJV, then all other new versions combined.
Also...
More Real REVIVALS, worldwide, have begin, under the preaching and teaching of the KJV, then all other versions combined.

I would state with certainty, that most of you, were led to Jesus, by someone who was led to Jesus under the preaching and teaching of a KING JAMES VERSION.
 

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You see what I am saying....all of the time! It seems like every time....I am sure it is not, just a lot....Yes the word witch and witchcraft are in the KJV....but not in the scriptures. The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions. Good bye….Adiós….Arrivederci…. Auf Wiedersehen….Hasta la vista.
Go away.

You are 100% accurate when you write that "The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions." It is a political translation to justify James I version of Protestantism; to glorify him, not God or Christ.

It is beyond baffling that people are still seduced by the mistranslation. The Pilgrims and others had the sense to flee his corrupt kingship, Geneva Bibles in hand. Thank God they did!

Throughout his youth, James was praised for his chastity, since he showed little interest in women. After the loss of Lennox, he continued to prefer male company. A suitable marriage, however, was necessary to reinforce his monarchy, and the choice fell on fourteen-year-old Anne of Denmark, younger daughter of Protestant Frederick II. James personally supervised the torture of women accused of being witches. After 1599, his views became more sceptical. "Hold no Parliaments," [James] tells Henry, "but for the necesitie of new Lawes, which would be but seldome". James maintains that the king owns his realm as a feudal lord owns his fief, because kings arose "before any estates or ranks of men, before any parliaments were holden, or laws made, and by them was the land distributed, which at first was wholly theirs. And so it follows of necessity that kings were the authors and makers of the laws, and not the laws of the kings."

After the Gunpowder Plot, James sanctioned harsh measures to control English Catholics. In May 1606, Parliament passed the Popish Recusants Act, which could require any citizen to take an Oath of Allegiance denying the Pope's authority over the king. James was conciliatory towards Catholics who took the Oath of Allegiance,[125] and tolerated crypto-Catholicism even at court. Henry Howard, for example, was a crypto-Catholic, received back into the Catholic Church in his final months.[126] On ascending the English throne, James suspected that he might need the support of Catholics in England, so he assured the Earl of Northumberland, a prominent sympathiser of the old religion, that he would not persecute "any that will be quiet and give but an outward obedience to the law".[127]

In the Millenary Petition of 1603, the Puritan clergy demanded the abolition of confirmation, wedding rings, and the term "priest", among other things, and that the wearing of cap and surplice become optional. James was strict in enforcing conformity at first, inducing a sense of persecution amongst many Puritans; but ejections and suspensions from livings became rarer as the reign continued. As a result of the Hampton Court Conference of 1604, a new translation and compilation of approved books of the Bible was commissioned to resolve discrepancies among different translations then being used. The Authorized King James Version, as it came to be known, was completed in 1611 and is considered a masterpiece of Jacobean prose. It is still in widespread use."

James gave the translators instructions intended to ensure that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology, and reflect the episcopal structure, of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.

Instructions were given to the translators that were intended to limit the Puritan influence on this new translation. The Bishop of London added a qualification that the translators would add no marginal notes (which had been an issue in the Geneva Bible). King James cited two passages in the Geneva translation where he found the marginal notes offensive to the principles of divinely ordained royal supremacy.

For example, Exodus 1:19, where the Geneva Bible notes had commended the example of civil disobedience to the Egyptian Pharaoh showed by the Hebrew midwives, and also II Chronicles 15:16, where the Geneva Bible had criticized King Asa for not having executed his idolatrous 'mother', Queen Maachah (Maachah had actually been Asa's grandmother, but James considered the Geneva Bible reference as sanctioning the execution of his own mother Mary, Queen of Scots). Further, the King gave the translators instructions designed to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology of the Church of England. Certain Greek and Hebrew words were to be translated in a manner that reflected the traditional usage of the church. For example, old ecclesiastical words such as the word "church" were to be retained and not to be translated as "congregation". The new translation would reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and traditional beliefs about ordained clergy.


Excerpted from the Wikipedia article on James 1 and the King James Version. It's worth reading in its entirety.

Anybody who claims that the King James translation is the pure Word of God are, simply put, deluded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grailhunter

Behold

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2020
15,647
6,442
113
Netanya or Pensacola
Faith
Christian
Country
Israel
You are 100% accurate when you write that "The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions."

Tbat which you wrote, is taken from the "cult of KJV haters".
Its not factual, but it makes for an interesting proof of your group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michiah-Imla

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Tbat which you wrote, is taken from the "cult of KJV haters".
Its not factual, but it makes for an interesting proof of your group.

That post was in response to a post by Grail Hunter. I wrote... "You are 100% accurate when you write that "The people that translated the KJV must of felt they could put anything they wanted in their Bible....infamous for the errors and additions." So you're actually responding to him, although I agree with what he wrote.

I have never heard of the "cult of KJV haters". That sounds very similar to the King James Only cult and their false thinking.
 
Last edited:

Behold

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2020
15,647
6,442
113
Netanya or Pensacola
Faith
Christian
Country
Israel
I have never heard of the "cult of KJV haters". They sound very similar to the King James Only cult.

There is no such thing as a KJO Cult.
This is just a bumper sticker, a deceptive propaganda, created by haters of the KJV, to try to create a false and "cult sounding" label regarding people who use the KJV.
The cult is the people who hate the KJV, and want to demonize it.
There is your cult, revealed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michiah-Imla

Truther

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2019
10,295
1,479
113
62
Lodi
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
An audience of intelligent, literate Christians who want to know what God's Word really says, instead of clinging to a 411-year-old political translation that they're duped into thinking is accurate.
What does God's word "really" say that the KJV missed?
 

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is no such thing as a KJO Cult.
This is just a bumper sticker, a deceptive propaganda, created by haters of the KJV, to try to create a false and "cult sounding" label regarding people who use the KJV.
The cult is the people who hate the KJV, and want to demonize it.
There is your cult, revealed.

Riddle me this..!

The cult is the people who hate the KJV, and want to demonize it, but there is no such thing as a KJO cult.

This is total nonsense. Where is the cult of people who hate the KJV located? Who is their leader? Is there a newsletter, web site, or publication that the members subscribe to?

I did find this online: The KJV Only cult is comprised of highly divisive people who make extreme and ludicrous declarations about the KJV in their efforts to exalt it as being the only word of God.
This belief is the very foundation of KJVO, but it is also proof that such people have given little or no serious thought to their own position, for to say such is also to imply there was no word of God before 1611. To be aware of this implication discredits the whole KJV Only foundation, for obviously the word of God was available without the 1611 KJV. It also implies there is no word of God in any language other than English! That means there is no word of God in Spanish, Russian, German, French, etc.! Again, this is absurd and obviously wrong.



It's an excellent description of the KJV Only cult. I found nothing about a cult of people who hate (your choice of word) the KJV.
 

Jim B

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2020
5,793
1,797
113
Santa Fe NM
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What does God's word "really" say that the KJV missed?

There are far too many errors in the KJV to list them all here. An excellent clue to why a particular translation is false is to determine why it was created in the first place. If you read my post #912, you will see wwho King James was as a person and why the KJV was created.

Here is two excerpts: Instructions were given to the translators that were intended to limit the Puritan influence on this new translation. The Bishop of London added a qualification that the translators would add no marginal notes (which had been an issue in the Geneva Bible). King James cited two passages in the Geneva translation where he found the marginal notes offensive to the principles of divinely ordained royal supremacy.

the King gave the translators instructions designed to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology of the Church of England.
 

Michiah-Imla

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2020
6,165
3,287
113
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
#912

King James cited two passages in the Geneva translation where he found the marginal notes offensive to the principles of divinely ordained royal supremacy

You keep bringing this point up about the marginal notes. MARGINAL NOTES ARE NOT THE INSPIRED WORD OF GOD!

I actually agree with limiting marginal notes of a commentary nature. Marginal notes should only be used to explain translational issues!

The marginal notes in the Geneva Bible were ADDED by the translators, not God!
 

Michiah-Imla

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2020
6,165
3,287
113
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There are far too many errors in the KJV to list them all here.

This is bad comedy.

@Jim B uses the corrupted Alexandrian Texts to “prove” errors in a translation based on the Received Text. How intelligent you must be…

What a gross error.
 

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
11,247
5,323
113
66
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What does God's word "really" say that the KJV missed?

Ya got to be careful what you ask for....
A SHORT LIST OF ERRORS, MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS THAT APPEAR IN THE KJV FOR THE NEW TESTAMENT ONLY … MANY MORE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

As a matter of perspective all of these discrepancies do not originate from the King James Version of the scriptures…many of them were adopted from the Jewish Vulgate Translation, the William Tyndale Bible and the Geneva Bible. At times the translators of the KJV played the Amplified Bible thing LOL where they would add words that they thought clarified the meaning of the verse….

You will see the phrase; "Not found in the earlier manuscript" The study of manuscripts as they move forward in history shows that people added and modified scriptures as they moved along. So the older manuscripts that were copied shortly after the biblical era are considered more reliable.

(1) Matthew 9:13
KJV: But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice.’ For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.

Discrepancy: The KJV added “to repentance”..ie come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.”

(2) Matthew 17:21
KJV: Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

Discrepancy: This verse is an addition and not found in earlier manuscripts.

(3) Matthew 18:11

KJV: For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost.

Discrepancy: This verse is an addition and not found in earlier manuscripts. But a longer version of this appears in Luke 19:10.

(4) Matthew 20:16
KJV: …. for many be called, but few chosen.

Discrepancy: An addition and a duplication of Matthew 22:14 and not found in earlier manuscripts.

(5) Matthew 23:14
KJV: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

Discrepancy: This verse is an addition….not found in earlier manuscripts. And is an expansion of similar verses in Mark and Luke.

(6) Mark 7:16
KJV:
If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.

Discrepancy: This verse is nearly identical to verses 4:9 and 4:23. But this verse is an addition….not found in earlier manuscripts.

(7) Mark 9:44 and 9:46
KJV: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. ..

Discrepancy: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplications of verse 48. But these these verses are additions and not found in earlier manuscripts.

(8) Mark 11:26
KJV: But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.

Discrepancy: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15 but this verse is an addition….not found in earlier manuscripts.

(9) Mark 15:28
KJV: And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors."

Discrepancy: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. But this verse is an addition….not found in earlier manuscripts. It does not appear in any manuscript until the 6th century.

(10) Mark 16: 9-20
KJV
Eleven verses added to the ending of the Gospel of mark.

Discrepancy: The KJV adds eleven verses to the end of the Gospel of Mark. Not found in earlier manuscripts.

(11) Luke 4:4
KJV:
And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

Discrepancy: The KJV added the words; but by every word of God.

(12) Luke 4:8
KJV:
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

NASB: Jesus replied to him, “It is written: ‘YOU SHALL WORSHIP THE LORD YOUR GOD AND SERVE HIM ONLY.’”

Discrepancy: This is an addition and a reworking of the scriptures. Also get behind me, Satan, does not appear in the earlier manuscripts.

(13) Luke 17:36
KJV:
Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

Discrepancy: This verse is obviously a rewording of Matthew 24:40. This verse is an addition….not found in earlier manuscripts.

(14) Luke 23:17
KJV: For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.

Discrepancy: The same verse or a very similar verse appears in Matthew 27:15 and Mark 15:6. But in Luke they are additions. Not appearing in older manuscripts.

(15) Luke 24:40
KJV:
And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.

Discrepancy: This verse is an addition and does not occur in older manuscripts.

(16) 1 John 5:7–8
The infamous Comma johannine Addition


KJV: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Discrepancy: This is a well known replacement of the actual scriptures with an intent to support a theological belief of the time period.

NASB: For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.

(17) John 8:1-11
KJV: The story of the Adulterous Woman brought before Christ.

Discrepancy: This is an addition and no part of it appears in older manuscripts. But that is not the end of the story. This story is also in the Geneva Bible and discussed by early Christian writers. I have done extensive research on this and there is evidence that this story goes back before it made its way into the newer manuscripts. It was a controversial story along with the story of the prostitute that washed Christ's feet with her tears. The issue: Christ unequivocally forgave both women without them asking for forgiveness. It was a very old and well known story....it is a periscope scripture, because it was "stuck" very awkwardly in the scriptures but important enough that "they" felt it needed to be preserved in the Bible...and so it was. Considering all the evidence, it is my opinion that this story actually happened.

(18) The words witch witchcraft and bewitched in the KJV
KJV
Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. The word sorceress here pointed directly to women.
Deuteronomy 18:10 The phrase here is practice magic.
1st Samuel 15:23 The word here is divination.
2nd Kings 9:22 The word here is sorcery.
2nd Chronicles 33:6 This verse is reworded from the original. The words here are sorcery and divination and mediums….the words wizards, enchantment, and familiar spirits were added.
Acts 8:9 The word here is amaze or astonish, not bewitched.
Acts 8:11 The word here also is amaze or astonish, not bewitched.
Galatians 3:1 Now this one is interesting, It appears once in the scriptures. Scholars do not agree on its use here or its meaning. Just that bewitched is not in the scriptures…. something like….cast a spell or enchanted.
Galatians 5:20 The word here is sorcery.

Discrepancies: The word witch, witchcraft, and bewitched cannot be in the scriptures because the words did not exist at that time. Although the Catholics and Catholic Bible were responsible for the horrible torture and deaths of millions the KJV continued the false beliefs. I say continued because the Witch-hunt Inquisition era was mostly between 1200 AD and the later 1600's. So the Witch-hunt thing was winding down as the KJV gained in popularity.

The word witch has it own meaning(s) and imagery and superstitions associated with them, that are not biblical. But the word witch introduced all this into the Catholic and Protestant Bibles.
The atrocities of the Church, both Catholic and Protestants that were associated with the witch-hunts and inquisitions are so horrible that we cannot discuss them on this forum. Most of the women and men that died were killed for their property, because they would charge them for the torture and executions. Most of the Catholic inquisitions were politically motivated or they were killing people of other faiths, like Protestants and Jews. The word witch is mostly associated with women. The Catholic Church produced a book called the Malleus Maleficarum …Latin for the Hammer of Witches which was an instruction manual on how to locate and torture and execute witches, mostly female. A lot of the information in the Malleus Maleficarum was a collection of superstitions which eventually made its way into Christianity. First step, strip them and inspect them. Oh surprise surprise!

Now in perspective, there are witches….mostly nature witches and satanic witches. The new age beliefs dabble in this. I know Satan witches exist because I have had run in’s with them.

(18) John 9:4
KJV: I must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work.

Discrepancy: Should be; We must work the works of Him who sent Me….

(19) Acts 8:37
KJV: And Philip said, "If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest." And he [the Eunuch] answered and said, "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."

Discrepancy: This verse is an addition to the scriptures….not found in earlier manuscripts.
 
Last edited: