On that sad day, America lost over 3000 souls to eternity by brutal attacks. Now I am not a scientist, architect or engineer but after spending dozens of hours studying reports of architects, engineers and scientists, I still remains convinced the twin towers and building 7 were intentionally dropped! And that the Pentagon was hit byu a missile and not a plane. Let me present in summary the evidence from over three thousand architects, engineers, chemists, physicists, metallurgists and pilots.
1. Those towers should not have fallen straight down. they both were hit in a quadrant creating an asymmetrical rip in the building- so the top parts should have fallen over.
2. When the planes hit the tower- over 95% of the jet fuel exploded inthose fireballs, thus severely restricting fuel to burn and melt steel.
3. Jet fuel can only burn at a maximum of 980c. Steel melts at 1371-1540c. Jet fuel cannot heat up enough to melt steel.
4. The towers were to code so they had flame retardant coatings and sheetrock. They had fire suppression systems so a fire was designed to be kept at bay.
5. When the buildings fell, they fell at free fall speed! Just like a building that was intentionally demolished
6. If a building is collapsing straight down there is a physics process known as "pancaking". The upper floors will fall, slow down when it reaches the next floor, and so on and so on. so the fall should have been in a jerky matter. also as a building pancakes down- as one floor hits another both top and bottom where contacting lose material, so even with the tower that wwas hit near floor 70, as it fell the top chunk would keep losing mass until finally the building standing would cause the collapse to stop after approx. 40 floors.
7. Interviews with Firefighters right before the collape, showed on TV, they heard multiple pops right before the buildings fell. This is 100% consistent with a building being demoished! They set charges at specific floors at specific points and set them off in a precise order to drop a building at free fall speed.
7. the debris itself speaks against a natural collapse. The pile for a natural fall was too small and debris to fine.
8. the debris field was too small. In a natural collapse, material would have been hurled much further than it was here. As one floor came crashing to another, chunks of debris would have arced and hurled as much as twice as far in this destruction.
9. Molten steel was seen pouring out of one of the towers! This event was almost 400c. to cool to actually melt steel
10. Building 7 which was not hit by a plane nor by massive debris- fell in a perfect preplanned demolition way. When one looks at teh collpase frame by frame, you see it collapse in on itself then drop at free fall speed . This was a planned drop. Buildings damaged do not drop at free fall speed. Demolioshed building do.
11. there are mnay other salient points but I do not wish this to become too lengthy. Especially in light of the fact that many of the professional visdeos showing these were drops have been removed from the internet.
As for the pentagon?
1. 300 Pilots signed an affidavit saying no plane could have hit the pentagon.
2. Flying to fast for the speed, th eplane would have cartwheeled from the vortex it created.
3. the hol ein the pentegon is too small.
3. All videos showing the scent approx. 30 minutes after the "plane" hit shows no seats, no luggage no strewwn clothing, no bodies, no bloody parts, no major plane parts ( engines and wings would have sheared off and be lying on the grond- no wings, no major jet engines)
4. The one video showing the collision is a blur but it is too close to the grouns for a plane flying at that speed. A plane would create a vortex and cartwheel.
5. Planes do not make near 90 degree turns on a dime like this did.
6. this crash is a classic example of a cruise missile hit.
I know this is controversial and that many will think I am nuts (what else is new).
but I remember coming home from work and watching the replays of the towers collapsing and I told my wife, they dropped those buildings! I speculatged that maybe they pre set charges in buildings like them soi that if they sustain serious damage, they can drop them straight down to reduce the damage to the city ( that was a blind guess on my part)
But the n when I saw and heard and read reports from chemists who studied the debris, engineers who rebuilt the towers tro scale and recreated the crashes, architectsm, physicists etc.etc.etc. I became coninced those buildings were intentionally dropped.
there are still many videos on you tube! Look up architects for 9?11 truth and they will also link you to many other reports by PHD's who actually experimentd and tested and examined 9/11
1. Those towers should not have fallen straight down. they both were hit in a quadrant creating an asymmetrical rip in the building- so the top parts should have fallen over.
2. When the planes hit the tower- over 95% of the jet fuel exploded inthose fireballs, thus severely restricting fuel to burn and melt steel.
3. Jet fuel can only burn at a maximum of 980c. Steel melts at 1371-1540c. Jet fuel cannot heat up enough to melt steel.
4. The towers were to code so they had flame retardant coatings and sheetrock. They had fire suppression systems so a fire was designed to be kept at bay.
5. When the buildings fell, they fell at free fall speed! Just like a building that was intentionally demolished
6. If a building is collapsing straight down there is a physics process known as "pancaking". The upper floors will fall, slow down when it reaches the next floor, and so on and so on. so the fall should have been in a jerky matter. also as a building pancakes down- as one floor hits another both top and bottom where contacting lose material, so even with the tower that wwas hit near floor 70, as it fell the top chunk would keep losing mass until finally the building standing would cause the collapse to stop after approx. 40 floors.
7. Interviews with Firefighters right before the collape, showed on TV, they heard multiple pops right before the buildings fell. This is 100% consistent with a building being demoished! They set charges at specific floors at specific points and set them off in a precise order to drop a building at free fall speed.
7. the debris itself speaks against a natural collapse. The pile for a natural fall was too small and debris to fine.
8. the debris field was too small. In a natural collapse, material would have been hurled much further than it was here. As one floor came crashing to another, chunks of debris would have arced and hurled as much as twice as far in this destruction.
9. Molten steel was seen pouring out of one of the towers! This event was almost 400c. to cool to actually melt steel
10. Building 7 which was not hit by a plane nor by massive debris- fell in a perfect preplanned demolition way. When one looks at teh collpase frame by frame, you see it collapse in on itself then drop at free fall speed . This was a planned drop. Buildings damaged do not drop at free fall speed. Demolioshed building do.
11. there are mnay other salient points but I do not wish this to become too lengthy. Especially in light of the fact that many of the professional visdeos showing these were drops have been removed from the internet.
As for the pentagon?
1. 300 Pilots signed an affidavit saying no plane could have hit the pentagon.
2. Flying to fast for the speed, th eplane would have cartwheeled from the vortex it created.
3. the hol ein the pentegon is too small.
3. All videos showing the scent approx. 30 minutes after the "plane" hit shows no seats, no luggage no strewwn clothing, no bodies, no bloody parts, no major plane parts ( engines and wings would have sheared off and be lying on the grond- no wings, no major jet engines)
4. The one video showing the collision is a blur but it is too close to the grouns for a plane flying at that speed. A plane would create a vortex and cartwheel.
5. Planes do not make near 90 degree turns on a dime like this did.
6. this crash is a classic example of a cruise missile hit.
I know this is controversial and that many will think I am nuts (what else is new).
but I remember coming home from work and watching the replays of the towers collapsing and I told my wife, they dropped those buildings! I speculatged that maybe they pre set charges in buildings like them soi that if they sustain serious damage, they can drop them straight down to reduce the damage to the city ( that was a blind guess on my part)
But the n when I saw and heard and read reports from chemists who studied the debris, engineers who rebuilt the towers tro scale and recreated the crashes, architectsm, physicists etc.etc.etc. I became coninced those buildings were intentionally dropped.
there are still many videos on you tube! Look up architects for 9?11 truth and they will also link you to many other reports by PHD's who actually experimentd and tested and examined 9/11
