US Supreme Court 5-4 Allows Ban On Abortions In Texas, After Heartbeat Is Detected

[Pythagorean12]

The 5th nor the 14th provide protections for marriage, biblical standards play no part in its interpretation

Same sex marriage was given to America by a liberal majority in the Supreme Court, their decision was based upon personal preference, not constitutional provision, because there isn't any seen below in the citations you claim

Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Fourteenth Amendment

• All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The legal principle in both amendments that applies and as SCOTUS noted is that of equal protection.

 

[Truth7t7]

The legal principle in both amendments that applies and as SCOTUS noted is that of equal protection.

Equal protection in due process regarding "Life" "Liberty" "Property", it has absolutely nothing to do with "Marriage"

"Life" Death Penalty

"Liberty" Imprisonment

"Property" Seizure

 

[maximum velocity]

I have to agree with Truth7t7 in this discussion, because there isn't a legal provision for marriage in the Constitution.

 

[Pythagorean12]

Equal protection in due process regarding "Life" "Liberty" "Property", it has absolutely nothing to do with "Marriage"

"Life" Death Penalty

"Liberty" Imprisonment

"Property" Seizure

Believe what you want. The law isn't going to change because there are Christians who believe inequality in a secular institution is righteous.

Anyway, this discussion is about abortion.

 

[Pythagorean12]

I have to agree with Truth7t7 in this discussion, because there isn't a legal provision for marriage in the Constitution.

I think people can disagree as they choose. The reality is, there is a legal provision. And that's why gay marriage is legal. And now always will be.

What we might want to realize is marriage is a secular institution. That's why the states issue a marriage license.

Marriage as God prescribes has not been amended by SCOTUS.
And the first amendment guarantees it never will be.


So what's the problem?

 

[Truth7t7]

Believe what you want. The law isn't going to change because there are Christians who believe inequality in a secular institution is righteous.

Anyway, this discussion is about abortion.

The constitution dosent protect same sex marriage, period

A majority of liberal Supreme Court Justices gave America same sex marriage, without constitutional support

You claims of inequality are silenced, is there a constitutional protection for being fat and ugly?

That will be the next dreamed up protection on the Liberals agenda

 

[Truth7t7]

What we might want to realize is marriage is a secular institution. That's why the states issue a marriage license.

Marriage as God prescribes has not been amended by SCOTUS.
And the first amendment guarantees it never will be.

So what's the problem?

Marriage is a religious institution, created by God in the beginning

The world has followed this biblical institution, and the liberals aren't changing this anytime soon

Same sex marriage is evil, against the very principles of nature

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve

 

[Truth7t7]

I think people can disagree as they choose. The reality is, there is a legal provision. And that's why gay marriage is legal. And now always will be.

What we might want to realize is marriage is a secular institution. That's why the states issue a marriage license.

Marriage as God prescribes has not been amended by SCOTUS.
And the first amendment guarantees it never will be.


So what's the problem?

There isnt a legal provision in the constitution for same sex marriage, a majority Liberal Supreme Court Justices decided on their personal bias, it's that simple

It's not unbiased law, but personal bias in a liberal majority, it's that simple

 

[Truth7t7]

I have to agree with Truth7t7 in this discussion, because there isn't a legal provision for marriage in the Constitution.

That's correct, a bunch of Liberal Supreme Court Justices gave America (Same Sex Marriage), and yes it was their personal bias and not constitutional law

Liberal Judicial Activism On Display

 

[Ronald Nolette]

Yes. The owners were allowed to beat their slaves as long as it didn't kill them .

Not any time they wished. In the OT in the Mosaic Law found in Leviticus and Deuteronomy it is clearly spelled out how to treat slaves. And randomly beating them is not there.

Ephesians 6:9
Chapter Parallel Compare
9 And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him.

Exodus 21:26-27
Chapter Parallel Compare
26 “An owner who hits a male or female slave in the eye and destroys it must let the slave go free to compensate for the eye. 27 And an owner who knocks out the tooth of a male or female slave must let the slave go free to compensate for the tooth.

Deuteronomy 23:15-16
Chapter Parallel Compare
15 If a slave has taken refuge with you, do not hand them over to their master. 16 Let them live among you wherever they like and in whatever town they choose. Do not oppress them.

Leviticus 25:42-46
King James Version

42 For they are my servants, which I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: they shall not be sold as bondmen.

43 Thou shalt not rule over him with rigour; but shalt fear thy God.

44 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.

45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.

46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.

 

[Pythagorean12]

Not any time they wished. In the OT in the Mosaic Law found in Leviticus and Deuteronomy it is clearly spelled out how to treat slaves. And randomly beating them is not there.

Ephesians 6:9
Chapter Parallel Compare
9 And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him.

Exodus 21:26-27
Chapter Parallel Compare
26 “An owner who hits a male or female slave in the eye and destroys it must let the slave go free to compensate for the eye. 27 And an owner who knocks out the tooth of a male or female slave must let the slave go free to compensate for the tooth.

Deuteronomy 23:15-16
Chapter Parallel Compare
15 If a slave has taken refuge with you, do not hand them over to their master. 16 Let them live among you wherever they like and in whatever town they choose. Do not oppress them.

Leviticus 25:42-46
King James Version

42 For they are my servants, which I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: they shall not be sold as bondmen.

43 Thou shalt not rule over him with rigour; but shalt fear thy God.

44 Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.

45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.

46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.

That they would not die. That was the prohibition.

 

[Pythagorean12]

There isnt a legal provision in the constitution for same sex marriage, a majority Liberal Supreme Court Justices decided on their personal bias, it's that simple

It's not unbiased law, but personal bias in a liberal majority, it's that simple

Believe what you want. The facts remain unaltered by your bias.

 

[Pythagorean12]

Marriage is a religious institution, created by God in the beginning

The world has followed this biblical institution, and the liberals aren't changing this anytime soon

Same sex marriage is evil, against the very principles of nature

God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve

The world, even according to God's word, isn't obligated to believe, or to think our beliefs rule the day.

Marriage was instituted by God for his people. Not all people.

See, "elect", "chosen people".
Christianity isn't inclusive.