Warnings to the churches about gaining eternal death

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
That God loves us does not translate into us being saved from hell.

So Romans 8:38-39 falls short in being a passage on eternal security.

For that doctrine, I stick to the more concrete passages (such as John 5:25, John 6:47, and John 10:27-30).
I find it hard to read Romans 8 and yet to think that I and other readers, trusting what it says, can or should yet feel doubtful about salvation and eternal security.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I find it hard to read Romans 8 and yet to think that I and other readers, trusting what it says, can or should yet feel doubtful about salvation and eternal security.
It definitely helps in the process of understanding the doctrine. I would just say that it doesn't present an airtight case for it (whereas other passages do).
 
Last edited:

farouk

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2009
30,790
19,232
113
North America
It definitely helps in the process of understanding the doctrine. I would just say that it doesn't present an airtight case for it.
I myself do appreciate that the Calvinist Perseverance of the Saints does follow logically from the previous propostions, but really it's the Scripture passages which underlie the various Calvinist propositions rather than the abstract logic itself that strengthen me and challenge me.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I myself do appreciate that the Calvinist Perseverance of the Saints does follow logically from the previous propostions, but really it's the Scripture passages which underlie the various Calvinist propositions rather than the abstract logic itself that strengthen me and challenge me.
Same here.

I have posted somewhere on these boards, how the logic of TULIP leads me into the conclusive understanding of the free will and sovereignty of man.

So I'm not much for the logical suppositions of Calvinism either.

However, I do definitely see that scripture substantiates such a doctrine as POTS.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you play Bible roullette you are liable to shoot a Bible verse through your head.
 

Zachary

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
733
179
43
B.C., Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
So, in losing their salvation do they cease to have everlasting life?
Then it was not everlasting, but temporal life.
This appears to be a contradiction that I am unable
to reconcile at the moment. Maybe you have an answer?
I thought we had agreed that ...
INITIAL salvation is a far cry from FINAL salvation!

One is initially saved eternally (but can "choose" to lose it).
This is most beneficial to the new babes in Christ.
Encouraging and positive ... like John 3:16, etc.

Salvation is a process! ...just as... sanctification is a process!

The above is not referring to positional sanctification, which is:
God seals the BAC, which indicates He will be working on him.
And his guardian angel(s) will be aware of what's going on, etc.
.
 
Last edited:

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I thought we had agreed that ...
INITIAL salvation is a far cry from FINAL salvation!

One is initially saved eternally (but can "choose" to lose it).
This is most beneficial to the new babes in Christ.
Encouraging and positive ... like John 3:16, etc.

Salvation is a process! ...just as... sanctification is a process!

The above is not referring to positional sanctification, which is:
God seals the BAC, which indicates He will be working on him.
And his guardian angel(s) will be aware of what's going on, etc.
.
John 5:24 would teach us that (in a sense) initial salvation is final salvation...that upon believing we pass from death into everlasting life.

If one is initially saved eternally, then nothing can take salvation away; otherwise it isn't eternal, it is temporal.
 

Zachary

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
733
179
43
B.C., Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
John 5:24 would teach us that (in a sense) initial salvation is final salvation...that upon believing we pass from death into everlasting life.
If one is initially saved eternally, then nothing can take salvation away; otherwise it isn't eternal, it is temporal.
Yes, it is one of the John 3:16 type of verses,
which we know is nonsense because it doesn't
specify what kind of belief is necessary,
e.g. it doesn't rule out simple intellectual belief,
which most kids have in Sunday School, right?

IMO, these types of verses are the little hooks
used to catch the unsuspecting little fishes!
They offer nothing but hope, confidence, optimism, etc.
Later, the Holy Spirit tries to illuminate these little fishes with deeper
understanding about what's involved over time as they grow and learn, etc.

What dost thou thinkest about "counting the cost" of following Jesus
... (before really getting started?)?
.
 

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Now there is a contradiction in the Bible unless there John 5:24 rules out a nominal, lukewarm, and shallow faith...i.e. mere mental assent to the tenets of the gospel...because Luke 8:13 declares that there are those who "believe for a while and then fall away."

It is also important to count the cost of being a disciple.

But I would say that there is a difference between being a disciple and being saved...a person can be one and not also be the other.

And also, the requirement for being a disciple is greater than the requirement for being saved...

while a person may fulfill the requirement for being a disciple and not be saved...

simply because the requirements are different for each one.
 

Zachary

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
733
179
43
B.C., Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Now there is a contradiction in the Bible unless there John 5:24 rules out a nominal, lukewarm, and shallow faith...i.e. mere mental assent to the tenets of the gospel...because Luke 8:13 declares that there are those who "believe for a while and then fall away."
It is also important to count the cost of being a disciple.
But I would say that there is a difference between being a disciple and being saved...a person can be one and not also be the other.
And also, the requirement for being a disciple is greater than the requirement for being saved...
while a person may fulfill the requirement for being a disciple and not be saved...
simply because the requirements are different for each one.
Yes, this is the crux of the olde "Lordship Salvation" issue!
The more I've been involved, the more I see spiritual Truth
in the following (from a tract of mine) ...

If Jesus is our SAVIOR, then we need to treat Him as our LORD!
Paul and Peter both called Him several times, “LORD and Savior”.

If Jesus is LORD, we need to love and obey Him … Jesus said 4 times:
“Those who love Me will obey My commandments.” (John 14:15, 21, 23, 24).


Many Scriptures are very clear … obedience is NOT an option!

Pastors are responsible to God for WARNING His sheep about sin!

“God has called us to live holy lives, not impure lives. Therefore, anyone
who refuses to live by these rules … is rejecting God” (1 Thessalonians 4:7-8)


“It would be better if they had never known the way to righteousness
than to know it, and then reject the command to live a holy life” (2 Peter 2:21)
.
 
Last edited:

justbyfaith

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2018
21,740
4,114
113
51
San Pedro
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes, we obey Jesus because we love Him.

But we do not obey Jesus to prove to other people, to ourselves, or to God, that we love Him.

We love Him because He first loved us (1 John 4:19).

Because we are forgiven much (Luke 7:36-50).

Because He has shed abroad His love in our hearts via the Holy Ghost (Romans 5:5), through our faith in Him (Galatians 3:14).

So then, our obeying His commandments is not based in legalism; and ought not to be based in legalism.

We do not obey Him in order to earn our salvation; and we do not obey Him to prove that we are Christians.

We obey Him because we are Christians....because He has placed his love in our hearts through faith in Him and His shed blood on the Cross of Calvary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amadeus

Zachary

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
733
179
43
B.C., Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Yes, we obey Jesus because we love Him.
But we do not obey Jesus to prove to other people, to ourselves, or to God, that we love Him.
We love Him because He first loved us (1 John 4:19).
Because we are forgiven much (Luke 7:36-50).
Because He has shed abroad His love in our hearts via the Holy Ghost (Romans 5:5), through our faith in Him (Galatians 3:14).
So then, our obeying His commandments is not based in legalism; and ought not to be based in legalism.
We do not obey Him in order to earn our salvation; and we do not obey Him to prove that we are Christians.
We obey Him because we are Christians....because He has placed his love in our hearts through faith in Him and His shed blood on the Cross of Calvary.
But, you're not speaking to our last posts, and yours was ...

"But I would say that there is a difference between being a disciple
and being saved...a person can be one and not also be the other.
And also, the requirement for being a disciple
is greater than the requirement for being saved...
while a person may fulfill the requirement for being a disciple
and not be saved...simply because the requirements are different for each one."
.