Are you saying Peter per Acts 2:38 was disobeying Jesus per Matt 28:19?
No you are
Peter is faithful and demands baptism according to Matt 28:19 and so does the tradition of the church of the apostles fro 2000 yrs
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you saying Peter per Acts 2:38 was disobeying Jesus per Matt 28:19?
What is it with Catholics that they post threads to provoke.what is the source of truth for Christians?
What is the rule of faith for Christians?
What is the pillar and ground of truth?
Like what?What is it with Catholics that they post threads to provoke.
Are you saying Peter per Acts 2:38 was disobeying Jesus per Matt 28:19?
No you did not.Valid Christian baptism requires the flowing water over the forehead three time.
wanna guess why?
cos
First I baptize you in the name of the father
second and of the son
third:
and of the Holy Spirit!
and a sacrament is an outward sign
Which is a gift from God to help our little minds see what he does inwardly and invisibly by his grace!
As grace Washes our souls in the merits of Jesus blood from original and personal sin, so the outward action of washing is visible!
without the outward action the inward action cannot take place!
Jn 3:5 Titus 3:5 water and washing
acts 22:16 wash away your sin!
No you did not.
The name of the son is not "son".
Repent.
Acts 2:38 is the true baptism, which is obeying Matt 28:19 as intended.are there two baptisms or only one!
are you denying the blessed trinity?
What is it with Catholics that they post threads to provoke.
What about Peter in Acts 2:38 telling the 3000 the name of the son is Jesus and that is the baptismal name to use?No you are
Peter is faithful and demands baptism according to Matt 28:19 and so does the tradition of the church of the apostles fro 2000 yrs
No you did not.
The name of the son is not "son".
Repent.
Acts 2:38 is the true baptism, which is obeying Matt 28:19 as intended.
And yes, there is no such thing as a trinity of God.
3 does not equal 1.
Acts 2:38 is the true baptism, which is obeying Matt 28:19 as intended.
And yes, there is no such thing as a trinity of God.
3 does not equal 1.
What about Peter in Acts 2:38 telling the 3000 the name of the son is Jesus and that is the baptismal name to use?
Why don't you obey Peter?
You call him your Pope.
Jesus taught his name was "son"?thats 2000 years of divine and apostolic tradition (teaching) from Christ himself
No, revealed by ancient Roman reprobates.the divinity of Christ and the blessed trinity are revealed Christian doctrine by Divine tradition and taught by the apostolic tradition of the church and to deny them is to deny God who revealed them
No.you can’t have three persons with the same nature? That’s a question
No, revealed by ancient Roman reprobates.
No.
They have an individual nature but similarly human.
If I die, your nature continues.