I feel the opposite way, If we explain something in our own words we are doing what Jesus warned us not to do, listen to the words of the traditions of men and the Apostle Paul warned us not to listen to another gospel only the one from Christ.
The Apostle Paul warned us not to listen to another gospel even if it comes from an angel.
But isn't that what you are doing when you search for "proof-texts" to support your preconceived traditions of men?
You disregard the scriptures I bring, claiming they don't fit your "whole Bible view".
As a follow-up to this previous topic... In BIBLE we trust? - Misplaced allegiance? Seems too many make an idol of their personal interpretation of the Bible. Claiming theirs is the only truth and that others are "of the devil" because their view differs. What's wrong with this picture...
www.christianityboard.com
I encounter this statement a lot...
Someone discounts a scripture I quote as
not possibly meaning what it plainly says because...
It doesn't fit the "whole Bible" view. ???
As if there is consensus on what that even means,
- Is there such a thing as a "whole Bible" view?
- Is there consensus on what that means?
- Is there reasonable latitude in what that could mean?
It's not enough to simply claim, "Whatever the Bible says."
Doesn't seem to be enough consensus to make such a broad claim. ???
[