I did tell you. Maimonides recommended it, and so do I.hey you never answered as to your daily bible study method. Which one do you use ?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I did tell you. Maimonides recommended it, and so do I.hey you never answered as to your daily bible study method. Which one do you use ?
Could it be because it was arrogant, disrespectful, and chock-full of congruency and no Scripture at all?I gave you the answer as one of my first posts here, but you did not like it.
You're just being intensely and purposely dogmatic. The verse has deep meaning to millions of people who know nothing of the context. And who gets to decide how far context stretches? Apparently, you do. You don't think that the fact that this was part of a conversation with a high-ranking Pharisee has any bearing on the verse. Or that Christ expected a Pharisee to know all about the new birth? (v. 10) Rigidly scientific Bible study bores me. I'm off the milk to some extent. I don't require much human hand-holding these days. Praise the Lord! I'm guessing if you were at CF, you were banned. The fact that you're taking all of this personally is shocking, considering your age.
anything other than ad hominem attacks to share ?Could it be because it was arrogant, disrespectful, and chock-full of congruency and no Scripture at all?
You have no scripture for it? So why did you demand scripture from Byrd? You have two standards it seems.
As the rapture and incarnation, I can't see that either. Such things are the result of the traditions of men.
Numbers 23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
First he says everything has to be from scripture. Now he says no, not everything. Looks "double-minded" to me.
In other words the other poster says, "I cannot understand big words, so I imagine a personal attack, and send out gratuitous insults in retaliation."anything other than ad hominem attacks to share ?
Honestly, Mark, I believe that we, along with Christ, the Lord will have exactly the same kind of bodies that Adam and Eve had before the fall, which were very good, according to God Himself. And that, along with the characters formed as a result of regeneration and the witness of the sufferings of Christ's resurrection body, complete with the scars of His passion will be as much as is needed and, indeed, more than enough to ensure no 2nd rebellion. And as men are not spirits, I believe there will only be 2 kinds left: the Spirit of God, Himself, and the spirits of holy angels. I also believe the Tree of Life is literal and is God's appointed sustenance for immortality. That's as honest as I know how to be, Mark. I don't expect anyone to agree with me, but I've held this basic belief for 30 years and have seen nothing else come along to convince me otherwise. I base it on the entire Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21. Christ is the Word made flesh and, like His own seamless garment, the written Word is without delineations in the disposition of sin and the redemption of man. God meets man where he is. That is the reason for the difference between that which was before the fullness of time had come and that which came after. Dispensations are foreign to me; every man who is ever saved, regardless of what he believed or thought, will be afforded it only by of the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God. Much love!A new creation spirit with an incorruptible body.
Our new creation spirit is created patterned after God, in righteousness and true holiness. True holiness, this means that in the inner man, we are truly holy, that is, completely and entirely given to God's use.
And our resurrection body will be incorruptible, so there can never be the fallen flesh to war with us as it does now.
Jesus didn't sin because He was born with the nature of God though in a body of flesh. That body, though corruptible, was not corrupted, and neither did Jesus do anything that would bring corruption into it.
As He is, so are we in this world.
We are born with the nature of God though in a corrupted body. Trade that corruptible for incorruptible, and we will have an advantage I don't think that even Jesus had while living in this would in His body of flesh.
What is your theory?
Much love!
Did you read it?anything other than ad hominem attacks to share ?
Whatever shall I do?If you neglect to comprehend what I post, I cannot help you
I'm not sure who Mike is, and I'm not sure what most of this meant.Honestly, Mike, I believe that we, along with Christ, the Lord will have exactly the same kind of bodies that Adam and Eve had before the fall, which were very good, according to God Himself. And that, along with the characters formed as a result of regeneration and the witness of the sufferings of Christ's resurrection body, complete with the scars of His passion will be as much as is needed and, indeed, more than enough to ensure no 2nd rebellion. And as men are not spirits, I believe there will only be 2 kinds left: the Spirit of God, Himself, and the spirits of holy angels. I also believe the Tree of Life is literal and is God's appointed sustenance for immortality. That's as honest as I know how to be, Mike. I don't expect anyone to agree with me, but I've held this basic belief for 30 years and have seen nothing else come along to convince me otherwise. I base it on the entire Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21. Christ is the Word made flesh and, like His own seamless garment, the written Word is without delineations in the disposition of sin and the redemption of man. God meets man where he is. That is the reason for the difference between that which was before the fullness of time had come and that which came after. Dispensations are foreign to me; every man who is ever saved, regardless of what he believed or thought, will be afforded it only by of the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God. Much love!
I would hang around and continue this edifying conversation but I got a thing at a place.of course I did hence my response.
Yes, right. Sorry, Mark.I'm not sure who Mike is, and I'm not sure what most of this meant.
Seeing Jesus' scars will be the preventative to sin, do I understand that part right?
Much love!
And can we be certain they will appear, Jesus' scars, that is?Yes, right. Sorry, Mark.
It doesn't exactly say that. The scars will remain, I believe.the Bible foretells that we won't remember anything of this heaven and earth
Many people think that.It doesn't exactly say that. The scars will remain, I believe.
is this what you are talking about below from the previous page :I did tell you. Maimonides recommended it, and so do I.
Some people after a while with God's help come to understand you in part my friend. Others depending perhaps too much on themselves and their knowledge of the Bible and certain embraced doctrines have trouble seeing who you are because you are not in the same place they are. What kind of vision is that?so, despite all that i would suggest forgiveness, ok;
no believer will ever be comfortable hearig that they are actually Esau i guess
fwiw i always put Scripture in italics tho, and best wishes to you new guys in your walk ok
you are in a diff kind of forum now, and i have grown a lot here, myself