Martin W.
Member
A lot of people confuse these two different events:
1..Jesus comes for his saints
2..Jesus comes with his saints
1..Jesus comes for his saints
2..Jesus comes with his saints
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A lot of people confuse these two different events:
1..Jesus comes for his saints
2..Jesus comes with his saints
Willfully confuse in the cases of some I might add. Guess it must be a real pain for some to have to go back and alter their positions. :lol:
Shoot even recently I had to alter my position on how I viewed the Magog Invasion, after reading "Israelstine" by Bill Salus. After that book presented its argument, I realized that my view of the timing of Magog and the events needing to precede it, were all wrong. I think some Christians are guilty of being prideful. Many think that because they've studied the Bible for years, that their interpretations are flawless and thus immune to any correction. I certainly view my study of the Bible as an always evolving process. I don't even think I'm going to be able to understand it all by the time of the RAPTURE.
That's about right, you don't understand. Someday you will see.
I really don't see any reason this topic should stay open. It will not get anyone any where.
Willfully confuse in the cases of some I might add. Guess it must be a real pain for some to have to go back and alter their positions. :lol:
Shoot even recently I had to alter my position on how I viewed the Magog Invasion, after reading "Israelstine" by Bill Salus. After that book presented its argument, I realized that my view of the timing of Magog and the events needing to precede it, were all wrong. I think some Christians are guilty of being prideful. Many think that because they've studied the Bible for years, that their interpretations are flawless and thus immune to any correction. I certainly view my study of the Bible as an always evolving process.
Jerry. It sounds like you are calling for censorship of people's views that do not fit with your own.
Please think carefully about that.
I have. What is being accomplished with this thread? Will any one change there mind? Likely not, the only way any one can support the rapture is by adding to or misinterpreting Scripture, or quoting from sources that add to or misinterpret Scripture. This forum does not go along with the rapture.
I have. What is being accomplished with this thread? Will any one change there mind? Likely not, the only way any one can support the rapture is by adding to or misinterpreting Scripture, or quoting from sources that add to or misinterpret Scripture. This forum does not go along with the rapture.
Jerry
The easiest thing to do with a subject that displeases you is to simply avoid it.
If enough people discard the topic or thread it will succumb on its own.
If two or more are gathered together to trade insight on a topic it should be of no concern to the disinterested.
I prefer to make my own decisions regarding which topics have my interest.
Thank you.
Martin
Jerry
The easiest thing to do with a subject that displeases you is to simply avoid it.
...
Martin
IF WE FAITH BELIEVERS ARE STILL HERE WHY ON EARTH DOES GOD NEED TO SEND 144,000 MORE TO PREACH THE WORD?
then this would include you too.That should tell you that you are not getting the job done. The words of man are being taught not the Word of God.
then this would include you too.
there are things other tan this forum going on but WHY SEND 144,000 IF THE WORD IS BEING PREACHED? UNLESS WE ALL ARE TELLING LIES AND HE SENDS THEM OR THERE IS NO ONE LEFT TO PREACH THE WORD. THOSE ARE THE ONLY 2 REASONS I SEE. HE SENT JESUS BECAUSE THEIR WAS NO SAVIOR.HE SENDS THE 144,000 BECAUSE THERE IS NO PREACHERS OF FAITH.