When Doctrine Corrects Christ

[The Gospel of Christ]

You would first have to understand the SIGNS of the END of this world leading up to His future return that He was giving His disciples there. Obviously, you don't understand those SIGNS, and even sounds like your don't want to understand them. Those SIGNS Jesus gave are the Seals of Revelation 6. And the last SIGN He gave there in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 was that of His future 2nd coming, which has NOT... happened yet to this day!

No, Davy. You’re doing it again.

I asked:

Where does Jesus say “this generation” means some other generation thousands of years later?

You answered by telling me I must first understand your system of “signs,” Revelation 6, and the future Second Coming.

Thats not an answer. Thats the framework being used to redefine the words in front of us.

Show me where Jesus Himself changes the generation.

Book. Chapter. Verse. >

Otherwise, all you’re doing is warning me that Chewbacca really was Leia’s husband because I first need to understand the hidden Wookiee signs before I’m allowed to read the scene normally.

In other words:

“You can’t understand the wedding photo until you accept the Chewbacca Covenant framework.”

Thats exactly the problem.

You still haven’t shown where Jesus Himself changes “this generation” into a generation thousands of years later.

And if you cant show that from the Bible, then everything else you’re building on top of it is irrelevant to the question I asked.

You need the

Book. Chapter. Verse.

to support everything else you’re claiming.

So where is it?

 

[Jack]

Keep that right hand clean! The Mark is coming right at you!
Revelation 13:16-17
16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

 

[amigo de christo]

WHEN doctrine cor rects christ , YOU CAN BET I WONT BE HEEDING a word one of it . you all have a lovely night now .

 

[Davy]

No, Davy. You’re doing it again.

I asked:

Where does Jesus say “this generation” means some other generation thousands of years later?

Nah... your question isn't that difficult to figure out. You are asking where's the Scripture evidence that "this generation" is meant specifically for the END of this world. No brainer what you're asking, so your little dance doesn't work.

You answered by telling me I must first understand your system of “signs,” Revelation 6, and the future Second Coming.

Thats not an answer. Thats the framework being used to redefine the words in front of us.

It is... an answer, and the correct one, IF... you'd bother to discipline yourself in study of Christ's Olivet discourse SIGNS with the Seals of Revelation 6. But all I'm hearing are excuses from you not to do that.

Show me where Jesus Himself changes the generation.

Book. Chapter. Verse. >

Otherwise, all you’re doing is warning me that Chewbacca really was Leia’s husband because I first need to understand the hidden Wookiee signs before I’m allowed to read the scene normally.

In other words:

“You can’t understand the wedding photo until you accept the Chewbacca Covenant framework.”

Thats exactly the problem.

I mean really? Now you're trying to use some Star Wars type analogy that doesn't make sense? Get serious.

Is English your first language?

Jesus said "This generation" shall not pass until they "SEE ALL THESE THINGS", meaning ALL THOSE SIGNS OF THE END HE GAVE, THE LAST ONE BEING THAT OF HIS FUTURE RETURN.

Matt 24:33-34
33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
KJV

Anyone who understands English well knows the above "all these things" are about the very SIGNS Jesus gave there at the Mount of Olives, the last SIGN being that of His FUTURE COMING and gathering of His Church.

The Scripture is EASY. But YOUR agenda against what Jesus said there is OBVIOUS.