Sometimes threads can be a bit hard to follow.What do you mean?
Angels are not human, of course...
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Sometimes threads can be a bit hard to follow.What do you mean?
Are you down playing their rebellion?
You dont believe the earth opening up and swallowing them and their families whole to this day is not represented by everlasting chains? You dont believe the chains are literal do you?
I am not downplaying their rebellion, so don't go there. And no ,them being swallowed alive is not represented by everlasting chains. This was an act of history. Just like them wanting to become priests is not an allegory for them leaving their first estate. and the 250 princes are not allegorical for aggelos or messengers or envoys! they would have sent messengers or envoys but not be envoys. And who were they an envoy for??? and to who?
First estate stands for heaven and spiritual beings. when angels interact with men they take on human form.
Tey left their habitation- is not an allegory for something- it means exactly what it says- they left the place where they dwelt! Heaven. It really is that simple. These angles were not part of the Luciferic rebellion, but they rebelled afterwards.
As to whether the chains are literal or not, I do not worry, but those spirits who left heaven and had sex with women in Genesis 6 are bound somehow someway with something. I will let the allefgorists with their mystic poweres figure out if they are literal or not.
I'm happy you at least have been exposed to one such interpretation. I think at some point we will need to deal with Genesis 6 clearly. There is other things going on in your post which also needs testing.
And which interpretation are you specifically referring to. I don't wish to take credit for what I am not sure of.
I await with humorous baited breath with how you intend to deal with Genesis 6.
Were you formally trained in Biblical exegesis and language or did you just spend time in the desert like John the Baptist and Paul to come up with these reinterpretations?
Noted. You didn't say God's will is done in Heaven...that would be a mouthful.
It is done in heaven now.
There are three heavens. Satan is restricted to the lowest heaven now, which is basically what we call the atmosphere.
God is in the third heaven.
In revelation 12 Satan and the fallen angels get kicked out of heaven completely and cast down to earth.
“You defiled your sanctuaries by the multitude of your iniquities, by the iniquity of your trading; therefore I brought fire from your midst; it devoured you, and I turned you to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all who saw you." - Eze. 28:18Where do you get this from?
The Bible mentions three different areas that are commonly translated as "heaven" in English bibles. The context of a passage reveals which heaven a passage is specifically referring to. The correct translation of Gen. 1 and 2 shows God created multiple "heavens": His dwelling place, outer space, and the atmosphere that we get oxygen from. Paul mentions in 2 Cor. 2:12 that there are 3 heavens, and that God's dwelling place is the third heaven. When the text mentions "heavens", it is referring collectively to the 1st and 2nd heavens.Where did you get that from?
“You defiled your sanctuaries by the multitude of your iniquities, by the iniquity of your trading; therefore I brought fire from your midst; it devoured you, and I turned you to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all who saw you." - Eze. 28:18
It really doesn't get any clearer than God declaring Satan was a fallen angel who deceived other angels into joining his rebellion. Revelation repeats the history that is mentioned in the OT by saying the dragon(Satan - Rev. 12:9) knocked down a third of the stars(angels - Rev. 1:20).
The Bible mentions three different areas that are commonly translated as "heaven" in English bibles. The context of a passage reveals which heaven a passage is specifically referring to. The correct translation of Gen. 1 and 2 shows God created multiple "heavens": His dwelling place, outer space, and the atmosphere that we get oxygen from. Paul mentions in 2 Cor. 2:12 that there are 3 heavens, and that God's dwelling place is the third heaven. When the text mentions "heavens", it is referring collectively to the 1st and 2nd heavens.
Our own atmosphere is the 1st heaven, followed by the 2nd heaven that is outer space, and that is in turn followed by the third heaven where God rules from. The "heaven" Elijah went up to was the 1st heaven, or the atmosphere(2 Kin. 2:11). The "heaven" David observed at night was the 2nd heaven(Psa. 8:3), or outer space. The "heaven" Christ ascended to was the 3rd heaven, or God's dwelling place(Acts 7:56). People generally fail to understand that the Bible refers to multiple areas that are all called "heaven", which is why they believe Elijah was taken to God's dwelling place.
As Job and 2 Kings show, Satan and his demons were still able to access God's dwelling place after their rebellion. However, as Revelation 12 shows, that isn't the case any more. Every last evil spirit has now been confined solely to the realm of the 1st heaven, which is why the angel in verse 12 says "woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea!". They are working overtime here because God has restricted them from having access to the last 2 heavens.
The angels who sinned, referring also to Jude, it is easy to notice the connection to sexual sins, the strange flesh mentioned...that these fallen angels took human women whore bore to them children who are the Nephilim (giants), men of renown in the ancient world. And they did that to corrupt the human race even further. Satan's goal was to prevent the prophecy of Genesis 3 where the Seed of the women (Christ to be born) would crush his head. And one way towards that was to mix angelic DNA into the human genome. Christ did not come to save any angels, they have no claim on Christ for salvation, God did not allow any such a thing as salvation for fallen angels. Which is another reason for the great flood, to destroy all flesh that were corrupted and start over with Noah, who God said was perfect in all his generations, (not tainted with corrupted DNA from fallen angles). For all we know, the fallen angels also corrupted the animals and changed them to be monstrous.
Genesis 9 This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations
Noah was not a perfect man, he sinned, so this perfection is not referring to having no sin. That verse is talking about his genealogy!
The phrasing here, Sodom and Gomorrah abusive sexual sinning, in a similar manner to these (the fallen angels), that shows the connection clearly.
Angels can take on human form and even eat food. No doubt the body they can form is fully capable of sex.
Then v8 'Likewise also these dreamers' clearly shows the fallen angels did sin, and now men are sinning some of the same things as these fallen angels, who defile the flesh, reject God's authority, speak evil of God and their superiors the holy angels above them.
Jesus tells Satan he cares nothing about God. Satan is mindful only of the things of men as in ruling over them in evil ways, and he is really of the flesh nature. The demonic realm is of this world, earthly, devilish, sensual.
Matthew 16:23
But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”
James 3:14-16, notice the sensual (sex), demonic , earthly satanic properties connection here...
New King James Version
14 But if you have bitter envy and self-seeking in your hearts, do not boast and lie against the truth. 15 This wisdom does not descend from above, but is earthly, sensual, demonic. 16 For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.
Jude
6 And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; 7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these dreamers defile the flesh, reject authority, and speak evil of dignitaries. 9 Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”
In 2 Peter 2, the Apostle warns of the impending judgment of false "Christian " teachers, comparing them to the false prophets seen in the Old Testament and the judgment of fallen angels who did not stay within their given domain.Who is willing to deal with the context of 2 Peter 2:4
Traditional Christians state angels can sin but the Scriptural evidence is far from convincing.
So what is the true context of 2 Peter 2:4?
2 Peter 2:4 is connected with 2 Peter 2:1. "But there were false prophets also among the people, [OT Israel!] even as there shall be false teachers among you! . . ." 2 Peter 2:2 and 2 Peter 2:3 are a warning of false teachers to come in the future, but verse 4 reverts to verse 1 and illustrates the judgment of God upon false prophets in Israel. In 2 Peter 2:5-7, Peter, guided by the Holy Spirit, selects two additional illustrations from Old Testament history to prove his point. The word for angels here is used for those false messengers with whom God judged. The question is what incident in Israels history could it be alluding to?
14 What is man, that he can be pure?
Or he who is born of a woman, that he can be righteous?
15 Behold, God puts no trust in his holy ones,
and the heavens are not pure in his sight;
16 how much less one who is abominable and corrupt,
a man who drinks injustice like water! Job 15:14-16
These verses are plainly contrasting men with the occupants of heaven.
Men don't live in a heavenly realm. That's not the description of creation from Genesis and whether you believe Genesis or not, the text is foundational to scripture. The Bible is progressive Revelation of God in the person of His Son. Jesus Himself quoted from the creation account in support of His teaching through the law and the prophets. The only "bias" I have is a biblical one. I believe the word of God, not just bits and pieces of it that satisfy my vain imagination. When you understand your own corruption and sin and believe Christ will save your evil soul, submit to Him and ask for His guidance and you may know Him. Amen.Hey Michael
I get your bias and its an easy one to infer.
The question here is whether the reference is to material “heavens” (as in Exodus 24:10 & Job 25:5) you no doubt appreciate heavens is not always referencing Gods High abode but rather the heavenly realm of men. The above verse might be better read "God puts no trust in his servants (earthy) and the heavens (ruling men of that time) are not pure in His sight.
You see Michael, Gods angels are all pure like Him possessing divine nature and behold His eyes! Mathew 18:10 Only corrupting flesh can sin i.e James 1:14 etc.
If you misinterpret your Job reference to force satan theology, how do I treat your other references/comments?
Where you say plainly, even the scholars who translated the original text are left scratching their heads as to what precisely is meant.
Verse 16 is the proof - If God cant trust His earthly servants...and not even those He sets in power over them...how much less the abominable and corrupt?
No need to bring God's heavenly servants into this verse....why?
Psalm 103:20
103:20 Praise the Lord, you angels of his, you powerful warriors who carry out his decrees and obey His orders
They always obey!
Men don't live in a heavenly realm. That's not the description of creation from Genesis and whether you believe Genesis or not, the text is foundational to scripture. The Bible is progressive Revelation of God in the person of His Son. Jesus Himself quoted from the creation account in support of His teaching through the law and the prophets. The only "bias" I have is a biblical one. I believe the word of God, not just bits and pieces of it that satisfy my vain imagination. When you understand your own corruption and sin and believe Christ will save your evil soul, submit to Him and ask for His guidance and you may know Him. Amen.
Holy ones translated as servants is interesting, but it isn't what the text says. Scripture doesn't stand alone, but is cohesive.None of that deals with the text.
14 What is man, that he can be pure?
Or he who is born of a woman, that he can be righteous?
So God's focus is looking at Mankind (context = humans)
Then the text turns to those earthly servants
15 Behold, God puts no trust in his holy ones (translated servants),
and the heavens are not pure in his sight;
God considering the failure in his earthly servants and those ruling over them He turns His thoughts toward the very worst of humanity.
16 how much less one who is abominable and corrupt,
a man who drinks injustice like water! Job 15:14-16
Very clear and simple...its clear...obvious...a careful reading of the Word.
Blessing.
Before any damage is done to Isaiah 14 lets lock away Job 14.Holy ones translated as servants is interesting, but it isn't what the text says. Scripture doesn't stand alone, but is cohesive.
Revelation 12:7
And there was war in heaven, Michael and his angels waging war with the dragon. The dragon and his angels waged war,
Heaven is not Earth, Earth is not heaven, and men are not messengers in heaven. Rebellion is sin.
Sorry, I think you're a fraud. I asked exactly one question and you danced around it. My post wasn't expository, but illuminated as in the fashion of the Apostles. I suppose that the Lord was a poor expositor as well.Before any damage is done to Isaiah 14 lets lock away Job 14.
Many translate angels to be servants, saints, angels or holy ones, all of which can (and does here) speak to human servants. You need to understand the context and we need to work with the text and not force inferences or notions, which are not present.
In relation to your "scatter gun" approach to exposition, do you find it odd you have gone to Isaiah & John's prophecy in the Revelation to prove what? What do you think the text concerning Lucifer is teaching and the highly symbolic apocalyptic language in Rev 12?
Sorry, I think you're a fraud. I asked exactly one question and you danced around it. My post wasn't expository, but illuminated as in the fashion of the Apostles. I suppose that the Lord was a poor expositor as well.
Again, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, who do you believe Lucifer is?