Are you suggesting that God wasn't sure how to express Himself so what was written ended up contradicting what He meant?
There is nothing I believe about the sabbath that contradicts what God said but God has a plan that is revealed in stages, we recognize that but others get stuck in the past and don't see that others are keeping up God's plan.
Which is the very reason you fail.
If you say you never fail and never sin, then I will say you are a liar.
The thing is, by going to the old auto-default accusation of "legalism" don't you exclude the possibility that believers can, by faith through grace, receive such power as is needed to keep the law just as God intended? Or perhaps you agree with Trekson above, that it isn't God's intention that we keep His commandments as written?
Besides the day of the week, which I believe that every day to a christian is the sabbath, how exactly do you think we ignore the law? and no noone, even with grace is able to keep the whole law as written. If we could, than Christ wouldn't have been necessary. The law was intended to show us that we are all sinners incapable of keeping the whole law and that is why we needed the salvation that only Christ's blood could purchase. If God honestly thought and expected man to keep the whole law, He never would have set up a sacrificial system in the first place, but He did because he knew we were incapable of keeping it and needed a way to cover our inevitable sins. The point could be raised that the law, at the time, was for Israel only.
Precisely...as I suggest above...but when it comes to obedience, such faith is deemed heretical by many at worst, and legalist at best. Christians claim and agree that the work of the holy Spirit is to change us into the image of Christ, but whenever it is suggested that such an image includes obedience to the laws of God, just as Jesus was obedient to the laws of God, that "image" becomes somewhat blurred and fogged up.