My initial response to these verses is that you seem to be trying to say by them, the Calvinistic doctrine that it doesn't matter whether a person receives Christ; that if God did not choose them, they are out of luck whether they receive Christ or not (at least that is the implication of what I have heard taught by Calvinism).
Which is in contradiction to the following:
Jhn 6:37, All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
Which indicates among other things, that the way in is for a man to come to Christ; and also, that those who come to Christ will not be rejected over the possibility that the Lord didn't choose them.
You have to admit that this is one of the main implications of Calvinism that you have to deal with when trying to convert a non-Calvinist. It is implied by the doctrine that if someone is not chosen by the Lord from before the foundations of the world, that they could not enter into the kingdom even if they wanted to.
Instead of being conducive to assurance, as is the claim of Calvinism, I find that the doctrines of Calvinism are contrary to assurance; because of this.
Someone offered Romans 10:13 as a basis for their assurance for their salvation. But if Calvinism be true, that is not an assurance; because the Lord might not have chosen you and therefore the fact that you called on the name of the Lord did not necessarily save you.