I think the evidence in support for a pre-incarnation Son is stronger than inference.
Yes. And yet the key to the pre-incarnation of the Son of God, only comes with a proper understanding of the creation:
God created the heavens and the earth and then created man of the same substance, and called it an "
image." Think that through very carefully.
From that point forward that image-based and defined world is revealed following the same "Let there be light; and there was light" process unfolding the man and his world. Which then with the fall comes the fulfillment and effect of darkness--that shadow of turning that only exists in this created world; and the unfolding and advancing of God's salvation plan--not only for this world, but to rid the heavens of darkness (evil) also, namely Satan.
Fast forward to Messiah, and the "
image" becomes "
God with us"--God himself, made manifest by and in the same imagery. Thus, God is One; and yet the image of God has seemed to take on an image of His own. But what shall we say, that a self portrait makes Two? Still, among men, among the world in its own context--if one is so foolish to insist upon doing so, or if considered in story form like the words of a book that is written--should not such a character exist and even be given His own name while the curtain is still showing Him as such? Would that not make such an image--God's babe, His child by creation?
Is the world really apart from God--and if so, is it not proper even to separate God from His own image?
It is--but only for a time.