If these verses do not go against trinitarianism, yes, I will ignore them. Thanks.
Scriptures that trinitarians Don't Want You to Know About - #5, Book of Acts
- Thread starter Wrangler
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
- Status
If these verses do not go against trinitarianism, yes, I will ignore them. Thanks.
Straw man?
You are the one that thinks God is physical with a right hand, white hair, sits on a fiery throne with wheels of burning fire!
That's an interesting one.
1Cor 10:4 says "and all drank the same supernatural drink. For they drank from the supernatural Rock which followed them, and the Rock was Christ.
So the Rock is Christ and the Rock is God. Therefore Christ is God
As is it is not possible to be referring to different rocks; Or AS IF 1,000 years before Jesus was born, Psalm was referring to someone not yet born; OR there is any prophecy of the Father becoming the Son.
We know the rocks are different because the rock in Psalm 89:26 specifically says the Father is the God, whereas Jesus is not the Father but his Son.
And he will call out to me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’
Psalm 89:26
Nursery rhymes, really? You haven't even ascribed to Him the name given. Is there a book of Yeshua? Did Yeshua lead Israel across the Jordan into the promised land? Did moses give his servant, Hoshea the son of Nun the name Yeshua? Did the high priest in Zerubbabel's day have Yeshua as his name and as a sign of the branch?
This is perhaps one of the most insane arguments that I've ever read, using carnal justifications similar to that of Mohammed and appealing to carnal understanding. The pastor at the church where I made the good confession, had a good word for such strange doctrine, "Hogwash", fit for pigs but does not glorify the Son as the Father Himself did He visited Israel in the person of His only begotten Son.
You understand what begotten means? How is a child less than His father except in matters of subordination. How is the creator of all things less than His Father?
This is sad and Anathema Maranatha.
Really. Nursery rhymes is where we learned Definition. Language Usage. Trinitarians get tripped up with sentence structures that indicate 2 beings are in the sentence, Jack and Jill and God (in his unitarian nature) and Jesus.
Yes, begotten is the source of all sons, created through procreation. From Merriam Webster's:
Definition of begotten = past participle of BEGET
Definition of beget = to procreate; to produce
Definition of beget = to procreate; to produce
Who?
Trinitarian doctrine is not about 3 gods, but One God in three persons and is demonstrated in multiple passages of scripture. Even the great commission is given with the instructions to baptize disciples in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Was God confused when He said that? Was God trying to confuse His disciples?
The unseen omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient, Father of all spirits, who exists in Eternity, outside of time, reached into time with His Holy Spirit, His voice, into His creation to bring forth all things through His Word, the ancient of days who sits on the throne of heaven, His creation, and He became a man in a moment of time in His creation, the very image of God and the glory of God, to satisfy the covenant of law and initiate His new and Eternal covenant of peace. There is only One God who is recognized by many names in scripture, but He has revealed Himself in three persons, the Father, invisible Spirit and Father of all Spirits, who glorifies the Son, in the Son, Jesus the Christ, the tabernacle of the Father who manifested in the Son (even in heaven) and glorified the Father in His life and in all creation, and in the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Christ, the Spirit of the infinite God who speaks to men in His creation, the voice of God that brought Revelation and honor to the Father through the Son and is given by the Father to His bride for the asking so that we may be One in the Son as He is One with the Father.
Those who believe receive His Spirit in adoption as Sons, but there is only One God who reveals Himself in 3 persons, and if you don't get that, you're as lost as the Jehovah's witnesses, who don't even know the covenant name that they pretend to witness for.
Yes and He also said, "Before Abraham was, I Am" and I Am is the name of the self existant and eternal God. Jesus wasn't speaking in a parable, but answering as the True and Faithful Witness.
Didactics isn't truth, its confusion, babel.
TheslightestID
Active Member
Hint, hint, as the bible teaches, and states time and time again, Jesus is the son of God. 
We can thank a man made Nicene Creed, and people that chase so-called higher knowledge, for doing nothing but confusing a very simple tuth...God is God, Jesus is Jesus, and the Holy Spirit is just that.
It really should all go without saying, but Satan loves his confusion..
We can thank a man made Nicene Creed, and people that chase so-called higher knowledge, for doing nothing but confusing a very simple tuth...God is God, Jesus is Jesus, and the Holy Spirit is just that.
It really should all go without saying, but Satan loves his confusion..
I'll bear that in mind when people say that Peter cannot be the Rock in Mt 16:18 because Jesus is the Rock.
Projecting trinitarian dogma onto unitarian text of Scripture is not truth but indoctrination.
No, it's not! 'I am' is a common identifier used today.
The idea that Jewish monotheism of 1 God, in his unitarian nature, stated over and over and over again for 1,000's of years should be swept aside with an "I am" statement is absurd in the extreme.
God did not say "I am the only God. Besides me, there is no other" in Deutoronomy 6:4 to be rejected with an "I am" statement later.
I'll bear that in mind when people say that Peter cannot be the Rock in Mt 16:18 because Jesus is the Rock.
Kind of. The rock is the confession, that the promise of God is fulfilled in anointing Jesus as God's suffering servant to pay a ransom for many.
Tri is 3, not one. And the trinity is not in the Bible, not the word, not the idea.
Apologists have to splice together numerous bits of verses here and there to 'support' the doctrine that is not there. There is no verse in 66 books where it is mentioned. It is such an important doctrine, it is not mentioned once! No verse goes like this The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit, who are cosubtantial, co-eternal and coequal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved. What's so funny is how trinitarians cannot admit this.
In the great sh'mah, echad has a broader meaning than the number 1 but also means unity as in there is unity between us or disunity. All who have received the ruach hakodesh, the Holy Spirit are united in His Spirit even if separated by carnality and internal strife. I understand these things and I don't even speak Hebrew or Greek.
So the pharisees, scribes, and priests wanted to kill Jesus for using a common identifier?
Have you prayed to the Father in the name of His only begotten son to receive His Spirit by faith and without doubting? I think not according to your error, but you tell me?
Hint, hint, as the bible teaches, and states time and time again, Jesus is the son of God.
We can thank a man made Nicene Creed, and people that chase so-called higher knowledge, for doing nothing but confusing a very simple tuth...God is God, Jesus is Jesus, and the Holy Spirit is just that.
It really should all go without saying, but Satan loves his confusion..
so is Jesus divine?
- Status
Similar threads
