Christ only died for past sins...

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Did Christ's sacrifice only count for past sins?

  • Only past sins are forgiven. We must maintain our salvation by not sinning.

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • Christ's sacrifice was all sufficient for all of the believers sins.

    Votes: 17 89.5%

  • Total voters
    19

friend of

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2018
1,748
1,369
113
33
B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
What makes you think he died for your sins. That is for Christ to decide.

That's like, the central tenet of Christianity man. To believe He died for our sins. If you don't believe that, you don't have faith.
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
…When we come to Jesus and repent of our inability to be righteous and know He is stronger and need His power inside us, that is when He cleanses us of all unrighteousness,…

Pardon me, but I don’t quite get what you mean by “repent of our inability to be righteous”?

Also what I understand scriptures is that it is when we come to repentance unto God and faith towards Jesus Christ, the Lord Jesus Christ baptize us with the Holy Spirit, that we are cleansed from all our unrighteousness.

Let me ask a question. Scriptures says that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. What do you understand by that?

Tong
R4002
 

friend of

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2018
1,748
1,369
113
33
B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
I don't believe he died for your sins. But I'm not sure. Can you prove that?

Matthew 6:14 For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you

Okay so you're just outright assuming I'm not saved then. Okay. Wonder why. Oh well.

That's enough internet for me today.
 

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2019
7,784
3,150
113
76
Tennessee
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Pardon me, but I don’t quite get what you mean by “repent of our inability to be righteous”?

Also what I understand scriptures is that it is when we come to repentance unto God and faith towards Jesus Christ, the Lord Jesus Christ baptize us with the Holy Spirit, that we are cleansed from all our unrighteousness.

Let me ask a question. Scriptures says that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. What do you understand by that?

Tong
R4002

We were still sinners, meaning later we wouldn't be. But that does not mean after we die, but now.

Revelation 22:11 shows two sets of people. One group going to hell, and one group going to heaven. After death we will remain in the state we died in, either sinners or righteous. There is no purgatory to overcome sin in for a sinner to become righteous.

But we cannot become righteous on our own, no matter how much we study the law. That was the problem depicted in Romans 7:13-25. Why? Because of the sin nature we were born with because of Adam's sin is naturally in opposition to the laws of God. We must realize this inability to be righteous on our own, and ask Jesus to cleanse our very nature. That is when He makes us born again and gives us a new nature that is filled with the power of God. It hates sin, and instead of being in opposition to the law, the laws are written on our new nature making them now part of our instinct to be naturally righteous.
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
Peter was talking and referring to false teachers who are among them and those who are with them and who follow them.



There are none that I know of.

But there are certainly scriptures that speaks about the certainty of one’s salvation in Christ Jesus. One such is found in Romans 8:38-39.


With regards Judas Iscariot, while he was chosen to be one of Jesus’ disciples, we learn from Jesus himself the matter about him (Judas). Jesus knew about him. Jesus obviously could not have chosen to save him.

With regards the prodigal son, I’d say such a take on that is a misuse of the parable. For one, the son in the parable was not a story about a son who was saved, who later lost it and then saved again.

With regards Ananias and Sapphira, their case was not a case of them losing salvation.
You are welcome to your opinion, but that is all it is. You interpret things in a way that fits your doctrinal beliefs. You make the text agree with you no matter if it is a stretch or not.

Ananias and Sapphira do appear to have lost salvation. The prodigal son was about a child of God being saved, lost and saved again. Until we all started pointing out that little detail about him being lost and dead and then found and "alive again," those promoting OSAS used to use that parable to claim he was always a son and saved. They had to back away from that and now claim it has nothing to do with salvation.

<<<Ananias and Sapphira do appear to have lost salvation.>>>

They died on the spot when they lied, that’s what scriptures says. There is nothing said about their salvation.

With regards the parable concerning the prodigal son, this is what we read:

Lk.15:24 for this my son was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.’ And they began to be merry.

Lk.15:32 It was right that we should make merry and be glad, for your brother was dead and is alive again, and was lost and is found.’ ”


Clearly what story it tells about, is about a son who was lost and is found. It is NOT about one who is saved and lost salvation and then was saved again.

Besides, if we read the entirety of the parable, it is simply not a parable given by Jesus to teach whether salvation could be lost or not. As I pointed out in my post, doing so is a misuse of the said scriptures.


Tong
R4003


 
Last edited:

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
That’s right, there is security for the elect. And yes, the elect are those that God chose for salvation even before the foundation of the world. So, you do know and believe the truth of the assurance of God’s salvation.
Yes and no. We do not have the assurance we are the elect. Only God knows who they are. We do not have that assurance because we do not know what may happen in our future. We could backslide and never return. So long as we are following Jesus, we all have security, but nobody that continues in willful sin is going to heaven.

<<<We do not have the assurance we are the elect. Only God knows who they are. We do not have that assurance because we do not know what may happen in our future.>>>

I agree that we do not know what may happen in the future. However, that does not mean that because of that, one could not have assurance of his salvation. For regardless, the truth which you pointed out, that is, there is security for the elect remains.

May I ask, do you have assurance or certainty that God exist? If you do have, can you tell us why or what makes you certain about that?

Tong
R4004
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
What is speculation that you refer to in my post? That God never fails?

Well, God never fails, at least that is my knowledge of God, who is heaven, Him who sent Jesus Christ some 2000 years ago, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the apostles. And I believe what God’s words tells me more than anything, more than even what my human eyes tells me.

You seem to have the view that God could fail in His chastisement of His erring children. And that even while you do not find any scriptures that says God could be a failure, more so, specifically in that regard.
That is not failure. God does not fail because someone does not receive correction. What God is doing is chastising to give people a chance to repent. You are assuming it is failure if they do not repent. I do not look at it like that.

<<<That is not failure.>>>

If when God chastise his erring child, and He was not able to discipline him as to bring him to repentance and learn from his error, is not failure on the part of God, then what is it? I am sure that no one would regard that as a successful chastisement on the part of God. You could put the blame on the child, but you cannot take away that the one who failed to achieve the end result, is God. And as I pointed out, at the end, God never fails in achieving His purpose/s.

Consider a father chastising his erring son. Obviously, the father has a good end result he wanted to achieve by that. And if he does not achieve it, that is unmistakably and indisputably a failure on his part. You can blame it on his son, but nevertheless, the one who failed to achieve the end result, is the father.

Now, if you don’t look at it that way, I am not at all forcing you not to. I could only hope.

Tong
R4005
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
I will try to show that to you. And I’ll leave the rest up to the Holy Spirit, as it ought to be like so.

2 Pet.2:12 But these, like natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed, speak evil of the things they do not understand, and will utterly perish in their own corruption,

2 Peter 2:17 These are wells without water, clouds carried by a tempest, for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever.

Who do you say are the “these” in those passages?

2 Peter 2:20 For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. 21 For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them. 22 But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: “A dog returns to his own vomit,” and, “a sow, having washed, to her wallowing in the mire.”

Now, who are the “they” in verse 20? Are they not the “these” in v.12 & 17?

Now, the mistake is often coming from the reading of v.20, on the phrase “For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ”. Many seems to fail to read “For if”. Such makes the statement hypothetical. Meaning, that which follows the “For if” is hypothetical only. And this is corroborated by what Peter said in v.12 concerning them, that is, they speak evil of the things they do not understand. This tells us that these people actually do not understand anything about what they teach about the gospel or about the Lord Jesus Christ. And such indicates that they are not true believers. For how can they truly believe and be true believers when they know not truth?
It is clearly hypothetical, but the point he is making is that if someone is saved and then returns to their old sinful lifestyle, their final end is worse than if they had never been saved. This is obvious to everyone except those trying to twist the text into knots to defend unconditional security.

At least you agree that it is hypothetical.

Still the case remains hypothetical, that is, not factual, not real, not actual.

And while it perhaps point to what would be the result on such hypothetical case, it does not follow that there are such cases. So, that passage is shown to come short of proving your case that the salvation of the saved, that is, of the elect or children of God, could be lost.

Tong
R4006
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
What makes you think he died for your sins. That is for Christ to decide.
Do you not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins? I do. And not only for me, but for all those whom the Father had given to Him to raise up on the last day unto eternal life, those who find themselves as can come to the Son, as were drawn by the Father, and who did come, truly believing in Him.

Tong
R4007
 
  • Like
Reactions: friend of

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
Pardon me, but I don’t quite get what you mean by “repent of our inability to be righteous”?

Also what I understand scriptures is that it is when we come to repentance unto God and faith towards Jesus Christ, the Lord Jesus Christ baptize us with the Holy Spirit, that we are cleansed from all our unrighteousness.

Let me ask a question. Scriptures says that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. What do you understand by that?
We were still sinners, meaning later we wouldn't be. But that does not mean after we die, but now.

Revelation 22:11 shows two sets of people. One group going to hell, and one group going to heaven. After death we will remain in the state we died in, either sinners or righteous. There is no purgatory to overcome sin in for a sinner to become righteous.

But we cannot become righteous on our own, no matter how much we study the law. That was the problem depicted in Romans 7:13-25. Why? Because of the sin nature we were born with because of Adam's sin is naturally in opposition to the laws of God. We must realize this inability to be righteous on our own, and ask Jesus to cleanse our very nature. That is when He makes us born again and gives us a new nature that is filled with the power of God. It hates sin, and instead of being in opposition to the law, the laws are written on our new nature making them now part of our instinct to be naturally righteous.
Thank you for your thoughts there.

Scriptures says that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. For me, that is profound.

One thing it tells me that it means, is that Christ saved us at that point in time or that His salvation of us was actually done at that point of time with respect to our sense of time. So that, all that follows is the unfolding out of what He had done at that point in time. The “us” there refers to all those who were saved by Him, that includes those who lived in the past, living at that present time, and those who will come to being in the future. We at present (of those future to that time) who had come to Jesus Christ, are among those for whom Christ died and saved.

Another would be that, Christ died at that point in time, for the past sins of those whom He saves who lived in the past, for the past and present sins of those whom He saves who are presently alive at that time, and for the future sins both of those whom He saves who are presently alive at that time and those who will come into being future to that point in time.

Still another would be that, His salvation of them is by grace, and not because they are righteous. In fact they are all sinners, as all of mankind are.

Tong
R4008
 
Last edited:

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,525
17,210
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Okay so you're just outright assuming I'm not saved then. Okay. Wonder why. Oh well.

That's enough internet for me today.
No that's not it. I don't believe he died for my sins either. Only for the people he chooses. If that is us then I am happy.
 

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,525
17,210
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Do you not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins? I do. And not only for me, but for all those whom the Father had given to Him to raise up on the last day unto eternal life, those who find themselves as can come to the Son, as were drawn by the Father, and who did come, truly believing in Him.

Tong
R4007
I think he'll decide that. I want him to die for my sins though.
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
Do you not believe that Jesus Christ died for your sins? I do. And not only for me, but for all those whom the Father had given to Him to raise up on the last day unto eternal life, those who find themselves as can come to the Son, as were drawn by the Father, and who did come, truly believing in Him.
I think he'll decide that. I want him to die for my sins though.

But He already had decided that even before His actual death on the cross more than 2000 years ago. He will die no more.

If you find or have found yourself as can come to Jesus Christ, and did come, truly believing in Him, then you can rest assured, He died for you. For that is what scriptures teach.

Tong
R4010
 

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,525
17,210
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
But He already had decided that even before His actual death on the cross more than 2000 years ago. He will die no more.

If you find or have found yourself as can come to Jesus Christ, and did come, truly believing in Him, then you can rest assured, He died for you. For that is what scriptures teach.

Tong
R4010
No @Tong2020 you can't rest. You must always be righteous and follow Jesus that way. Jesus' is the God of the righteous, not the God of evil.
 

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
No that's not it. I don't believe he died for my sins either. Only for the people he chooses. If that is us then I am happy.
Do I get it right? You don’t believe that Jesus died for your sins?

If that is the case, may I ask, do you believe your sins are forgiven by God?

Tong
R4012
 
Last edited:

Tong2020

Well-Known Member
Apr 30, 2020
4,854
848
113
*
Faith
Christian
Country
Philippines
Tong2020 said:
But He already had decided that even before His actual death on the cross more than 2000 years ago. He will die no more.

If you find or have found yourself as can come to Jesus Christ, and did come, truly believing in Him, then you can rest assured, He died for you. For that is what scriptures teach.
No @Tong2020 you can't rest. You must always be righteous and follow Jesus that way. Jesus' is the God of the righteous, not the God of evil.
Oh but I can and I do rest in God and Jesus Christ. It seems to me that is not the case with you. But not because you can’t, that it follows that the truth is that we can’t rest.

And to think that in saying that, that it means that I could go sinning, is a mistake.

Tong
R4013
 
Last edited:

An Apologetic Sheepdog

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2021
975
348
83
66
Atlanta, Ga
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No that's not it. I don't believe he died for my sins either. Only for the people he chooses. If that is us then I am happy.

I don't want to jump the gun here before I comment.

Would you please briefly outline what your specific understanding of the Salvation process is and what "information" ( writing, chapter/verse/etc.) that you base your understanding on?

Thank you
 

dev553344

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
14,525
17,210
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't want to jump the gun here before I comment.

Would you please briefly outline what your specific understanding of the Salvation process is and what "information" ( writing, chapter/verse/etc.) that you base your understanding on?

Thank you
Deuteronomy 32:39

King James Version

39 See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.

Matthew 25:34

King James Bible
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
 

An Apologetic Sheepdog

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2021
975
348
83
66
Atlanta, Ga
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
King James Version

39 See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand.

Matthew 25:34

King James Bible
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

Neither one of those answers the question i asked.( and you know that)

In a step by step manner- what do you understand the salvation process to be and on what do you base it?