But we can. Believers have the mind of Christ, wrote Paul.Prophets often do not understand what they are saying, seeing, or writing. :)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But we can. Believers have the mind of Christ, wrote Paul.Prophets often do not understand what they are saying, seeing, or writing. :)
Amen, Brother!But we can. Believers have the mind of Christ, wrote Paul.
Might I have an opportunity to redeem myself from side-stepping?
Could you point to some of these threats or are they something you experienced outside of the threads that are currently ongoing with regard to this matter?
To be fair, Isaiah is known as the Gospel prophet and may have been looking for a divine Messiah.
(I know that this might suggest some kind of neo-dispensationalism, but I'm not at all sure we're not comparing oranges with apples when we try to use Old Testament prophets to defend unitarianism.)
Sprechen sie Deutsch? :)you gotta get up pretty early in the morning to fool ole Barney fife!
I usually like to ask questions myself
Sooooo right there brother.And that NAME is JESUS CHRIST . The ONLY NAME whereby anyone can be saved . Let the glorious Lord be praised
Sprechen sie Deutsch? :)
His name is not simply a word formed by physical lips, tongue and vocal chords. People who cannot read and people who are unable to talk can be saved! What is meant when it said "gathered in my name"? It is not speaking about a word formed by our own physical lips, certainly!I will speak. The ramifications of what you seem to conclude from John 8:24 make God appear unjust. You seem to be implying that any Jew today who does not know and follow Christ as Messiah is lost. How can you judge hearts from a single verse? This is one instance in which the context reveals that he was not addressing the nation as a whole. Do you not know that the grace of God which leadeth to salvation hath appeared to all men? And that many millions, perhaps billions have never even heard the name of Christ. Yet His blood covers the sins of all who have responded positively to the Holy Spirit, regardless of their cultural or geographical handicap?
Ha, ha, ha, why don't you go down to the nursin' home and loosen the bolts on the wheelchairs?Ya learned to count in German on hogans heroes
It just happens that I learned some French when I's over there durin' the war.Ya learned to count in German on hogans heroes
It just happens that I learned some French when I's over there durin' the war.
Well, we won't be usin' 'em no more after this, so...everyone know it’s a mans legs go first!
yeh, dont think so...but maybe
No son of man may die for another's sins...
a verse, sorry
That is not what I have learned from my studies of the scriptures.....In the Hebrew writings the most frequent occurrence of the expression is in the book of Ezekiel, where over 90 times God addresses the prophet as “son of man.” (Ezekiel 2:1,3,6,8) The designation apparently serves to emphasize that the prophet is simply an earthling, highlighting the contrast between the human spokesman and the Source of his message, the Most High God.
The same designation is applied to the prophet Daniel at Daniel 8:17. A son of man is simply that.
In the Gospel accounts the expression is found nearly 80 times, applying in every case to Jesus Christ, being used by him to refer to himself. (Matthew 8:20; 9:6; 10:23)
This expression showed that God’s Son was now indeed 100% mortal human, having ‘become flesh’ (John 1:14), having ‘come to be out of a woman’ through his conception and birth to the Jewish virgin Mary. (Galatians 4:4; Luke 1:34-36)
Jesus had not simply materialized a human body as angels had previously done when carrying out their earthly missions; he was not an incarnation, but was actually a ‘son of mankind’ through his human mother. He had to be a genuine sinless human, not a sinful son of Adam, in order to redeem mankind.
That's a nice presupposition you got there.The apostles were anointed with God's Spirit and so, like Jesus, were aware of people's thoughts and motives.
Distinction without a difference?So when this couple lied to Peter, they could not lie to the Holy Spirit in him. That is tantamount to lying to God.
That is a nonsensical statement.
Isaiah said the son given is the mighty god
Might I have an opportunity to redeem myself from side-stepping?