I agree....no point in hanging around listening to an inconvenient truth....That is the best thing you can do.
Jesus will let us all know soon enough who he is......(Matthew 7:21-23)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree....no point in hanging around listening to an inconvenient truth....That is the best thing you can do.
As I only speak the truth as I understand it QT, what is it that I have revealed that others have not?Thank you for your responses AJ to both me and backlit. Your replies have given me a pretty good window into the core of how JW's are wired. It has been revelatory because these views have been concealed by other interactions if had with your fellowship.
Didn’t Jesus also demonstrate his righteous indignation in driving out the money changers and their animals from the Temple? There is a time to express righteous anger, as God himself has done throughout the history of Israel. Has God changed somehow between then and the coming of his Christ? It’s the same God and Jesus has been his son for eons of unknown time. Who knows him better?I will add, my understanding of the Jesus I have come to know has not always been as it is. I have learned that violence of any sort as a solution for anybody, God included, does not glorify him. What it actually does is paint him with the characteristics of Satan and the best way humans can think of in solving impassable problems.
I see no mysteries QT....all I see is a God who exacted obedience from those who chose of their own free will, to obey him. When they did not, he punished them with death. What is mysterious about that?God's justice is liberation from oppression not retribution and how he goes about achieving this is our privilege to understand. That is the mystery!
God’s laws do not involve sentiment, but they can involve mercy (which is merited).One final thing; it goes without saying that if God forbids killing and he himself kills, he is saying, do as I say not as I do. We all know this qualifies as hypocrisy. A hypocrisy we feign face up to.....it might expose us!
There are so many things to say in reply to you here AJ it is hard for me to know where to start.As I only speak the truth as I understand it QT, what is it that I have revealed that others have not?
Didn’t Jesus also demonstrate his righteous indignation in driving out the money changers and their animals from the Temple? There is a time to express righteous anger, as God himself has done throughout the history of Israel. Has God changed somehow between then and the coming of his Christ? It’s the same God and Jesus has been his son for eons of unknown time. Who knows him better?
Justice requires recompense, and I believe that God will soon demonstrate to disobedient mankind that his righteous indignation will soon be dished out in a way similar to the days of Noah......Jesus said that only “few” are on the road to life......so where does that leave the “many” who are on the wrong one? (Matthew 7:13-14)
Please tell me.....
I see no mysteries QT....all I see is a God who exacted obedience from those who chose of their own free will, to obey him. When they did not, he punished them with death. What is mysterious about that?
They knew the penalty before they committed the offence, so where was their excuse?
Freedom from oppression will come only by eliminating those who oppress.....is that not just a simple concept? Why do you want God not to be who he says he is, and to to do what he says he will?
Does that bring him down in some way, according to your estimations?
When Jesus comes to separate the sheep from the goats, what becomes of the goats? Not a smack on the wrist. They go to the place reserved for the devil and his demons......everlasting destruction.....never to be seen again. (Matthew 25:31-34; 41, 46)
You have to ignore a lot of scripture to take the position you have. Are we at liberty to do that?
God’s laws do not involve sentiment, but they can involve mercy (which is merited).
When God says “you must not murder” that is not saying that no one can be put to death for disobeying God’s laws because those laws and their penalty were clearly stated. “Murder” is “unlawful killing”.....Since God sanctioned the death penalty for certain sins, you need to take that up with him. He has authority to give life and to take it as he sees fit.....he will not abide by your rules because his rules offend you.
You have made God in your own image if you think he does not demand the death penalty.....Jehovah is the one portrayed in the scriptures, (all of the scriptures) like it or not....you cannot alter God to suit your own sensibilities.
His justice, like his other qualities is perfectly balanced. I love him for that.
There are so many things to say in reply to you here AJ it is hard for me to know where to start.
What I do know AJ, is the paradigm you are immersed in mirrors that of the natural man. What do I mean by that? I mean, seeing things from God's perspective is different, even opposed to how the natural man sees them....I'm sure you would agree with this?
So, I will dive in somewhere and offer and explanation of sorts.
Firstly, I would say that death is a consequence of disobedience to God and I'm quiet certain God does not stroke his chin after man has disobeyed and says to himself, now let me see, what can I do to punish these recalcitrant ragamuffins....ah yes, I know what I'll do, I'll kill them, I'll make them suffer.
Consequence, in the case of Adam and Eve had them running for cover....something had shifted in their reality and they thought God had it in for them (erroneously)....because we read he went looking for them.....like lost sheep :)
Blaming started when God addressed them, blaming of each other as well as God. I find that interesting.
From the moment of creation God was their only best friend and their partner (Adam or Eve) a buddy so close they were one flesh.....yet something happened within themselves as a result (consequence) of disobedience and the relationships they had took on suspicion and fear....even with the animals!
Everything shifted, they died spiritually and emotionally.....with the physical to catch up. And whats more, they passed on this heritage to all their progeny. A bind/ a prison none can escape. They were trapped and within the first generation murder surfaced and that by the hand of their firstborn. The trajectory was set.
God made promises to rescue them but how that rescue was to play out was a mystery to them and the preceding generations. Men had all sorts of ideas how this was going to be implemented the spearhead of which involved them appeasing the offended diety and somehow 'pulling up their socks' for the purpose of making a favourable impression on God. Nothing has changed fundamentally since those early days. The cover of the book, so to speak, has had updates but the pages contain the same principles. (I'm concerned you mightn't get my analogy?)
further....Whatever else was recorded by prophets, priests and kings, however it was understood, along comes Jesus......directly from the throne of God.....his objective; to make clear/plain God's purposes. The Fathers audible voice witnesses to this both at his baptism and on the mount of transfiguration 'this is my Son, listen to him' was the direction. A few simple words yet critically incisive! 'listen to him'
AJ.....are you tracking? It is pointless me going on unless we can see eye to eye on this fundamental foundation.
The spin largely agreed with here plays right into the hand of the thinking of the natural man.Jesus came the first time in love, as a lamb, but returns as the lion of the tribe of Judah, with judgment and wrath - it’s time to cleanse the world of evil and evil people at that time.
Violating obvious context Curtis is to your own hurt the which results in understanding remaining at a distance!Jesus: GO NOT FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE
I violated no context whatsoever.Violating obvious context Curtis is to your own hurt the which results in understanding remaining at a distance!
He told them to stay in one house re domicile.....that's the context. You are trying to shoehorn the account into meaning visiting homes for the purpose of sharing the gospel. JW's do not visit homes for the purpose of staying while they're in town.I violated no context whatsoever.
Jesus sent 72 disciples out to evangelize, and told them to pick one house in each city they visited, and told them specifically NOT to go house to house.
Read the passage. I did.
What is the paradigm you think I am immersed in?What I do know AJ, is the paradigm you are immersed in mirrors that of the natural man. What do I mean by that? I mean, seeing things from God's perspective is different, even opposed to how the natural man sees them....I'm sure you would agree with this?
That is a rather absurd picture you have painted there QT....what the Bible says has no such image. It was stated from the beginning that sin produces death. (Romans 6:23) If the first pair had not sinned, death would not have occurred because access to "the tree of life" would not have been withdrawn, so it would have been available as long as they obeyed their God. It was this tree that imparted everlasting life in their mortal flesh. Being mortal didn't mean they had to die...only that they could if they did the wrong thing.So, I will dive in somewhere and offer an explanation of sorts.
Firstly, I would say that death is a consequence of disobedience to God and I'm quiet certain God does not stroke his chin after man has disobeyed and says to himself, now let me see, what can I do to punish these recalcitrant ragamuffins....ah yes, I know what I'll do, I'll kill them, I'll make them suffer.
A knowledge of evil is what happened to them. They lost their innocence. The first thing they became aware of was their naked state because now evil thoughts came flooding in with each new vision. Shame was a foreign feeling, and it moved them to cove up their reproductive parts because sexual sin disrespects the sanctity of life...or the act that creates it.Consequence, in the case of Adam and Eve had them running for cover....something had shifted in their reality and they thought God had it in for them (erroneously)....because we read he went looking for them.....like lost sheep :)
Blaming started when God addressed them, blaming of each other as well as God. I find that interesting.
I don't really understand what you mean here...? By getting offside with their Creator, the first humans became aware that their Creator was not happy with them. He evicted them from their garden home and cursed the ground on their account, forcing them to become farmers.From the moment of creation God was their only best friend and their partner (Adam or Eve) a buddy so close they were one flesh.....yet something happened within themselves as a result (consequence) of disobedience and the relationships they had took on suspicion and fear....even with the animals!
Yes it was. But before Adam and his wife bore offspring (the foundation of the world) God had already formulated the remedy. (Genesis 3:15)Everything shifted, they died spiritually and emotionally.....with the physical to catch up. And whats more, they passed on this heritage to all their progeny. A bind/ a prison none can escape. They were trapped and within the first generation murder surfaced and that by the hand of their firstborn. The trajectory was set.
God kept the mystery of the Kingdom to himself until he sent his Messiah into the world and his apostles got to understand what it was all about.God made promises to rescue them but how that rescue was to play out was a mystery to them and the preceding generations.
Its sort of lost because I do not agree with what you said here.Men had all sorts of ideas how this was going to be implemented the spearhead of which involved them appeasing the offended diety and somehow 'pulling up their socks' for the purpose of making a favourable impression on God. Nothing has changed fundamentally since those early days. The cover of the book, so to speak, has had updates but the pages contain the same principles. (I'm concerned you mightn't get my analogy?)
QT it is hard for me to follow your line of thinking when mine is contrary to your own.AJ.....are you tracking? It is pointless me going on unless we can see eye to eye on this fundamental foundation.
Thus the watchtower doctrine that each believer has to go door to door and house to house in order to obey Yahweh, is wrong.
There’s no biblical requirement to go door to door.
A Christian has plenty of opportunities to witness at work, at the store, as they go through daily life.
Watchtower: you must go door to door from house to house.
Jesus: GO NOT FROM HOUSE TO HOUSE.
@JohnPaul The so called J W s...
Taze Russel and his 'ism was a false teacher. That is why you get everything wrong.
You are preaching to the deaf Aunty Jane, I never read or was taught that Jesus is God but his Son our Savior, these people believe what they want they bash the Catholic Church yet they have so much in common with it, and don't even see it.There is actually more scripture that disproves the trinity than the few ambiguous verses that are taught in Christendom to support it. There is not a single declaration in all of scripture where Jesus claims to be God. When the Christian scriptures were penned, there was no trinity in Christianity.
That doctrine was adopted and grafted into “the church” after much controversy, and finally became an official teaching of the church....but not until the 4th century.
LOVE! They must have caused the deaths of thousands by not allowing blood transfusions. Never mind broken marriages caused by their rules.I never heard of the man, I haven't seen more loving and compassionate people then Witnesses of the one true God Jehova, perhaps it's all of you who are getting the wrong message and without even knowing it are in league with the your Mother Church in Rome.
Don't say someone is wrong before first seeing the things you preach.
You are preaching to the deaf Aunty Jane, I never read or was taught that Jesus is God but his Son our Savior, these people believe what they want they bash the Catholic Church yet they have so much in common with it, and don't even see it.
Jesus Christ said depart from for I never knew you, and I believe
he said it to those who teach this false fabricated teaching made up by man and their Mother Church in Rome.
Stay strong my Dear sister and fight the fight and let not these people who criticize you get you, as you are a true soldier in God's army and you never give up, much respect and love for you Aunty Jane.
Taze Russell is the man who in the latter days of 1870 or thereabouts devised this crazy, mixed up and deeply flawed religion of yours, that resembles the religion of the Pharisees, and comes nowhere near to the teaching of Jesus, thereby insulting his Holy name.I never heard of the man, I haven't seen more loving and compassionate people than Witnesses of the one true God Jehova, perhaps it's all of you who are getting the wrong message and without even knowing it are in league with the your Mother Church in Rome.
Don't say someone is wrong before first seeing the things you preach.
I have no religion, but a relationship with God Almighty and his only begotten son Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.Taze Russell is the man who in the latter days of 1870 or thereabouts devised this crazy, mixed up and deeply flawed religion of yours, that resembles the religion of the Pharisees, and comes nowhere near to the teaching of Jesus, thereby insulting his Holy name.
.
If you include the Holy Spirit in that little speech of yours, which you need to do, then you have the Trinity which you deny.I have no religion, but a relationship with God Almighty and his only begotten son Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.
I only need include God the Father and the Son Jesus Christ, the path to salvation.If you include the Holy Spirit in that little speech of yours, which you need to do, then you have the Trinity which you deny.
I am reminded of the deceiver.
.