This subject came up in a recent conversation on another thread, and I realized I don't think it's ever been discussed here on this forum before.
That said, the above is a Faith teaching, with which I am familiar. Be advised: I want all contributions to this thread to be respectful of the other people's positions. If not, you may be reported by yours truly. But there is both truth and falsehood in Faith teaching. Any post given should have a scriptural basis, so please post in full the verses you are using to establish your argument.
God bless,
Hidden In Him
There were a lot of pages in the thread and it would have taken me all of today and the rest of the week to read them. So I read just a few.
This is my position on divine healing:
All the examples of miraculous healing attached to Paul's ministry were part of his preaching of the Gospel to the unconverted. I could not find any reference to "Healing Conferences" directed at Christian believers in the New Testament. Although all who came to Jesus were healed, this was during His earthly ministry to the "lost sheep of Israel", and miraculous healing to Gentiles happened after some persistence by the Gentile woman, and the fact that the Centurion had ridden a long distance to reach Jesus for the healing of his servant.
In my view, divine healing is not guaranteed on demand by Christian believers. James instructs what believers should do when they are sick - they should call for the elders of the church. But there is no instruction that the elders or anyone else to solicit guaranteed healing ministry to sick people.
There are many books written to guarantee the "right" formula for healing, but putting their instructions into practice doesn't achieve the result they promise. Even a healing manual that said that if we do it exactly how Jesus did it would achieve the desired result, actually didn't. So what does this show us? That there is no guaranteed formula that sidesteps the sovereignty of the Holy Spirit.
So there are no surprises that Paul reported of his own physical infirmities; in fact he glories in them, because when he is weak in himself, Christ is strong through him. He says in 2 Corinthians 1 that while in Asia he and his ministry team were so stressed that they despaired of life. He reports that Epaphroditus became sick through burnout. So there are no surprises that others on his ministry team became sick at times. This shows that there is no guarantee of perfect health for Christians, even those in ministry. These instances of members of Paul's ministry team becoming sick shows that Paul did not believe in guaranteed health or healing for Christian believers. There is no record anywhere that Paul went up to a sick believer and telling him that Jesus will heal him. His most notable miracle was the healing of a lame man when he said in a loud voice, "Stand upright on your feet!" And the man was instantly healed. But by all accounts the man was unconverted, although he and many people who witnessed the healing turned to Christ.
I know a person on CF a number of years ago who complained that they did not receive their healing, as if they thought they had an automatic right to it after asking God. But the Scripture says, "By prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, make your requests known to God and the peace of God that passes all understanding will keep your heart and mind in Christ Jesus." So what is guaranteed here is the peace of God as the result of supplication, not necessarily what is being requested. This is the sovereignty of God. We can make our requests and have the peaceful assurance that God has heard our prayer, but we must exercise faith and patience to await the outcome in God's time; and that if the outcome does not eventuate then we trust Him that He has a good reason for not providing the healing.
It is not unexpected that people on the thread come up with all sorts of comments and theories about the whys and wherefores of healing, when in reality, they have no control over whether a person is healed or not. Something think that they should have control and be able to wave their "magic wand" and the person is immediately healed. They say that Jesus healed everyone who came to Him, therefore if we are not healed when we ask for it, it is because we have sinned in some way, or do not have enough faith to be healed. These people can't admit that we have no control over the sovereignty of God. The clay cannot tell the potter what to do with it.
John Wesley's horse got healed of lameness as the result of prayer. The horse had neither sinned or had faith to be healed, and yet God healed it, because He decided that it was best for the horse to be healed so that Wesley could continue on his way without discomfort or further damage to the horse. Therefore if God decides to heal an unconverted person or a believer, then He will do it, but not before. Healing comes through the undeserved grace of God, and if people expect to be healed as the result of prayer, then grace is no more grace. The fact is, we can only ask - no more than that.
There are those who say, "God has promised healing in His Word, therefore He has to heal!" This implies that if a person is not healed, then God is not being true to His own promises. But such is not the case. There is no guarantee in the New Testament that God is obliged to heal anyone on request or on demand, and He is not locked into any formula that guarantees healing. Yes, He will hear and note our prayers, but the decision is up to Him, and Him alone whether a person is healed or not.
If the sickness results in death for the believer, well, it is an instance of "absent from the body, present with the Lord". The believer wins either way. The reason why more healing happens among unconverted people is that the issue is more crucial, because death for an unconverted person means an eternity in hell. Therefore it is more important that healing of terminal illnesses accompanies the preaching of the Gospel to the unconverted. This is where cessationists, when they find themselves before the Lord in the Judgment, may be required to account for the death of unconverted people who might have turned to Christ if signs and wonders were present when they heard the Gospel. The Lord may require the blood of those unconverted sick people at the cessationists' hands because they stood in the way of them being healed through their unbelief.