WHAT is this? It is way off-topic and not Biblical. Sola Scriptura.
that’s for behold since he loves the cult of the virgin
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
WHAT is this? It is way off-topic and not Biblical. Sola Scriptura.
what version was it that came to John in the wilderness? Lk 3:2
The Count Ludwig Von Zinzendorf (of Moravian Missionary fame) and the Wesley brothers both started "Bible Societies" to encourage people in ALL denominations of Christianity to actually READ and OBEY their Bibles and to become active in their (other denomination) Local Church. The RCC objected to Catholics reading the Catholic Bible ... that was the job of the Priests.Say what? What does this specifically mean?
... and my point is that it only takes a little poison to ruin an entire delicious meal; the apocryphal books are apocryphal because they contain drops of poison scattered among the pages ... the 66 books that ALL CHRISTIANS agree on, contain no poison but only LIFE.Not familiar with them
my point is Susana’s faith and trust in God
Three things the Bible never says:Scripture says give honor where honor is due
Mary is what God made her, not according to nature but according to grace
the dignity of Mary as mother of God is highly exalted
So you won’t read the Bible but you’ll keep doting about questions.
Start reading your Bible to get wisdom in these matters.
... and my point is that it only takes a little poison to ruin an entire delicious meal; the apocryphal books are apocryphal because they contain drops of poison scattered among the pages ... the 66 books that ALL CHRISTIANS agree on, contain no poison but only LIFE.
Three things the Bible never says:
- Mary is "omnipotent" (all powerful).
- "mother of God" ... the Bible NEVER says this, ANYWHERE!
- Mary was given any 'dignity' other than "blessed" (and she is not alone in being 'blessed' by God).
She was sinner, same way as my Mother was, and rejoiced in Jesus her savior!it is not possible to exalt or praise Mary more than her exalted dignity
She is the divine mother
Mother of God Lk 1:43
Mother of our salvation found our salvation Lk 1:30 consented to salvation lk 1:38
Her existence glorifying God lk 1:46
Mother of God Lk 1:43
Immaculate conception (sinless) gen 3:15 enmity or total war none of satans works are found in Mary!
Also Lk 1:28 full of grace lk 1:49 great things plural (immaculate conception of Mary and the miraculous conception of Jesus) Rev12:1 woman clothed with the sun. Immaculate purity
Lk 1:30 found favor with God (the salvation lost by Adam) mother of our salvation Lk 2:30 and cos she consented to our salvation! Lk 1:38
Perpetual Virgin Isa 7:14 matt 1:21
Lk 1:31-34
Spiritual Mother Jn 19:26-27 rev 12:17
A good tree!
Matthew 7:18
A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
The fruit of the tree of Mary is our salvation! Matt 1:21 Lk 2:30 Jesus is our salvation! This reflects the immaculate conception of Mary and the miraculous conception of Jesus!
Lk 1:30 Mary found our salvation!
Lk 1:38 consented to our salvation!
A good tree (immaculate conception) Lk 1:49 God has done this and it is marvelous in our eyes!
Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Matt 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
A sinner would be an evil tree with evil fruit, but the fruit of Mary is salvation!
Mary brings in the good fruits of our redemption and salvation!
the scripture never says anyone is a biological child of Mary except Jesus
(was a virgin only until she becamepregnant.)
This is denying the Christian doctrine of the virgin birth!
Isa 7:14 virgin shall conceive and BEAR a son
And one son singular
And her son is God
Mary is all powerful!
Not cos she is God but because her son is God!
Parents possess all that belongs to thier children
Mary is the queen of the heavenly kingdom
Christ the word on becoming man was subject to the keeping of his own commandments
Jn 2 the first miracle
His time has not yet come
God established a set time for the public ministry of Christ
Anyone else asked for this miracle and it would not have been done, but a higher law prevailed “honor Thy father and mother” and he worked the miracle and thru her intercession the disciples believed in Him!
Mary’s prayers are always answerd
mary is our spiritual mother, thank God she prays and interceded for us
see below
Grace And Peace, Precious friend(s). I believe it is a very serious matter
to determine Which version of “the Bible” Is “The Correct Word Of God!”
I am sure we All agree, do we not, that we are All going to each give an
"account To HIM," (2 Corinthians 5:10), According to His Gospel of Grace,
To Paul (Romans 2:16), correct?
Thus, in Light of Paul's "...knowing therefore The Terror Of The LORD..." {v. 11},
to me, I humbly present why I personally believe KJV Is “The Best Bible” to read/study:
(1) Q: Is IT not God’s Pure And PRESERVED WORD!?:
”The WORDS Of The LORD Are Pure WORDS: as silver tried
in a furnace of earth, Purified Seven Times. Thou Shalt Keep THEM,
O LORD, Thou Shalt PRESERVE THEM from this generation for ever.”
(Psalms 12:6-7 KJB!)
Now, Comparing This, with a couple of newer versions, what do we find?
NASB: “The words of the Lord are pure words…You, Lord, will keep them;
You will protect him from this generation forever.
NIV: “The words of the Lord are flawless…You, Lord, will keep the needy
safe and will protect us forever from the wicked,...
Do these Also claim God’s “Purity And Preservation for ALL generations”?
They both claim “pure/flawless” words, but, then they both
Omit Some Of: “Preserve THEM from this generation for ever” and
Change words TO the noted “Different” words above. How is that Purity?
Q: Will The Holy Spirit, our Blessed Teacher, Help us understand
“The Purity of These Words,” considering these newer versions
have Changed Them? How, then, do we “study AND agree”?
{Diligent/Noble Berean students can find MANY of These Changes
{And, Also “omissions”}, and Prayerfully/Carefully decide for themselves
about the “Purity of God’s Words,” and which version is best, for them,
correct?}
(2) I personally have decided on Both “The Purity And The
Preservation Of The Authorized Version/underlying manuscripts,”
for the following reasons:
Q2: Is The Following the “Reason” why the newer versions Cannot claim:
God’s Promise To “Preserve HIS Pure Word for ALL generations”?
Since the newer versions did not appear until about 1880,
would not that be a “Lack Of Preservation,” due to the fact
that the underlying {older/better?} manuscripts had to be
“Re-discovered/translated,” Skipping the generations since 1611?
Can that be God’s Purpose For HIS Pure/Preserved Word?
+
(3) God's Pure/Preserved Word Is ABOVE All Else! Is IT not?:
"I will worship toward Thy holy temple, and praise Thy HOLY
Name for Thy LovingKindness and for Thy TRUTH: for Thou
Hast MAGNIFIED Thy WORD Above All Thy Name!"
( Psalms 138:2 KJB! )
imho, unless I am mistaken, on Judgment Day, I would Not want
one of the "good deeds done in my body," to be “Bad, by my claiming”
that corrupt/Changed/Missing words {translated from older/hidden
{UNpreserved} manuscripts into “newer easier-to-read/understand
versions,” are to be:
God's Pure Word, Which Is “Magnified Above All Of God’s Pure/Holy Name,”
would you, Precious friend(s)?
Finally:
IF it is true that “Many {~~ 2,800?} Of “God’s PURE Words”
are missing {ie: Acts 8:37 NASB et al?} from newer versions, then,
IF the “version user” Cannot read Them {because They are missing},
how is it possible then, for that one to obey God’s Exhortation:
“man Shall Not live by bread alone, But By EVERY Word
That Proceedeth Out Of The Mouth Of God!”
(Matthew 4:4 cp Luke 4:4; Deuteronomy 8:3 KJB!)?
Just wondering: How can God's "children of light" be in agreement
when each uses a Different Problematic version?: Are we not all,
By A Faithful God:
"...Called Into Fellowship With God's SON, The LORD JESUS CHRIST"
(1 Corinthians 1:9 KJB!), And, should we not all be:
"Endeavouring to keep The Unity Of God's Spirit In The Bond Of
PEACE!..." (Ephesians 4:3 KJB!), obeying God's Exhortations!:
”...speak...the things which become Sound Doctrine!”
(Titus 2:1 cp "SAME mind And judgment!" 1 Corinthians 1:10 KJB!)?
Being faithful And Pleasing to our LORD and Saviour, JESUS CHRIST, Correct?
--------------------------------------------
Addendum: Some do Not like archaic words in God’s Preserved Word,
but isn’t that Why God Commands us to “study”? I.e.:
“...we which are alive and remain unto the coming of The LORD shall not
prevent [precede] them which are asleep…” (1 Thessalonians 4:15 KJB!)
Once I “studied & found the meaning,” have never had any problem since. Amen?
+
I would also, when Prayerfully/Carefully “studying, like to know," When "God Is
Addressing" one person {singular: thee, thine, & thou}, or More than one person
{plural: ye/you/your}. Could make a Huge Difference in His Pure Words, correct?
Since newer versions have Totally Lost these distinctions, considering
“you/your” Could be Either singular OR plural, causing Confusion, of
which God Is “Not the author of,” (1 Corinthians 14:33 KJB!), correct,
Precious friend(s)?
Conclusion: Besides changing God’s PURE Words, is there not Also
HIS “Command NOT to Add, Nor To Take Away From HIS Word!”?
(Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32; Proverbs 30:5-6; Revelation 22:18-19 KJB!)
So, yes, I sincerely believe This Is “A Very Serious And Important”
decision Of faith to be made! After all, "a corrupt {#} version Will
Cause a corrupt faith,” correct? Since God’s PURE Word Teaches:
“...faith cometh by hearing, and hearing By The WORD Of God!”
(Romans 10:17 KJB!)
Be Blessed!
{#} Corruption had Already Begun in "Paul's day," thus it should not
surprise us, that it very well Could be in our midst, today, correct?:
"For we are not as many, which corrupt The Word Of God: but as
of sincerity, but as of God, in The Sight Of God speak we in CHRIST."
(2 Corinthians 2:17 KJB!)
Precious friend(s), instead of All of the Mass Confusion, is not
God's Simple Will Much Better? To be continued in (2) below...
The Holy Spirit did that, and we have had translations made off the original languages way before the Kjv!what makes it “authorized”? And who had authority to authorize it?
Says what verse?the holy church has authority from Christ to teach the truth and to declare the scriptures
I read it just not cover to cover
the KJV boys screwed up Lk 1:28
Hail Mary full of grace
“And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.” (Luke 1:28)
How so?
And what is your reason for questioning the KJV translation of the quoted verse?
Let me guess, it’s based on the study “helps” which are mostly from the pro Alexandrian text persuasion.
Liberal theologians will not stop ruining faith in God’s word and continue to slander the most beautiful, God honoring, translation of our time; the Authorized (King James) Version.
If you do the research
AMEN! God's "Chain Of COMMAND!":Hence ... Sola Scriptura! ... we rely on the APOSTLES' TESTIMONY rather than any usurping self-proclaimed successors.
+ "Preserved For ALL generations!!" Correct?Liberal theologians will not stop ruining faith in God’s word and continue to slander the most beautiful, God honoring, translation of our time; the Authorized (King James) Version.