Why do you deny a Millennium?
Why ask why? The sons of God were created to live on earth, not in heaven with the angels. The angels were created to live in heaven.
The lost sheep of Israel are the lost sheep of Israel.
The wheat represents the Gentiles.
Are there not kings of the earth, meaning other nations and kingdoms mentioned in Revelation? How about this verse:
"And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it."
Do you just go around and nullify all Scripture that you think does not agree with your Amil paradigm that comes straight from human understanding, and not Scripture at all?
Where do you think all these nations come from, since you eradicated them all with a wave of your intellectual prowess?
These nations come from the earth being populated during those 1,000 years you deny will happen.
No verse claims the New Jerusalem has been an ark floating in the skies for the last 1993 years, ie your here and now. And then at the Second Coming they all step out and fill up the earth. Amil has no logical understanding of the entire volume of Scripture. You all cherry pick verses as excuses to contradict other clear Scripture. But no Scripture spells it out in modern lingo how you think it should be spelled out.
This is like pulling teeth with you. That is not what I asked.
- Are the sheep ("the lost sheep of Israel") the Church?
- Are the wheat (the Gentiles) the Church?
- Are the 144,000 the Church?
- Are those that are "beheaded during Satan's 42 months of AoD" the Church?
Last edited: