You expressed personal prejudice but that is about it.
See, you don't understand the way the devil marshals this game.
We get each other to repeat and expand what we've already made plain enough so that eventually someone gets mad or frustrated and overstates or misstates something, causing the other to perform the AHA!!! move. Then, everything spirals. It doesn't behoove you or me for me to cooperate in that vein.
Its actually a sociological definition. It is the cultural ideas of gender that have nothing to do with biology.
A distinction without a difference. Very nice.
Did you ever hear of "science falsely-so-called?"
It's in the Bible.
As for your "my truth" statement isn't that exactly what your implications that not all families are families or at least not worthy of being considered families is?
Maybe it's time you looked up "straw man fallacy." You have an uncanny propensity for misrepresenting what I say and believe.
Are wolf families lied about? Attacked? Discriminated against? Do people try to deny that wolf families are not families? Are children's books that talk about wolf families maligned? Have wolves had to hide for generations just to be safe?
if so then maybe they do need parades and celbrations.
You mean like everyone else has?
What is not being agreed with. The right for wolves to exist? To have families? To not have to hide? TO be treated the same as everyone else?
And now I quit, because it's plain to see that I lost you right after the word "Wait."
Sadly, I'm typing this up ready-to-go for when you reply.
-Save Draft-
