Mental Disorder of LGBT: Analysis - Spiritual, Political and Scientific

[Wrangler]

Truth. Homosexuality is NOT merely a morally equivalent ‘alternative’ but inherently self-destructive.

Well lets take a look at these claims.

Answering your questions never helps. You just fire back more emotional reasoning. All you want is an admission that you or someone or some group with whom you are in sympathy has been victimized and that you are justified in what the late Dr. Albert Ellis calls A-to-C thinking. Things are the way they are, regardless of what you or I think or feel. Take a good emotional intelligence (because I am definitely questioning that) test and see if you couldn't use some REBT or CBT (most of us could, so there's no shame in that).

There is something else, which the OP addressed. Tinman has embraced the false god of "Science." He's always on about evidence while denying evidence. His Strawman is that he is right unless 'scientific' evidence can be presented, which he summarily dismisses. This, he supposes makes him brilliant.

Blind he is to the full Analysis - Spiritual, Political and Scientific - of the subject matter. He cannot concede on a Christian site that God condemns homosexually. There is the most blatant evidence.

 

[BarneyFife]

There is something else, which the OP addressed. Tinman has embraced the false god of "Science." He's always on about evidence while denying evidence. His Strawman is that he is right unless 'scientific' evidence can be presented, which he summarily dismisses. This, he supposes makes him brilliant.

Blind he is to the full Analysis - Spiritual, Political and Scientific - of the subject matter. He cannot concede on a Christian site that God condemns homosexually. There is the most blatant evidence.

These observations, whether correct or incorrect are probably only beneficial to vindicating your view of things to yourself. They certainly don't give me anything to celebrate.

 

[Wrangler]

These observations, whether correct or incorrect are probably only beneficial to vindicating your view of things to yourself. They certainly don't give me anything to celebrate.

Dealing with those who don’t have ears to hear is never something to celebrate.

It’s more like something to mourn. Weep for the lost.

 

[Josho]

Here is what God says about the homosexual lifestyle.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." Leviticus 18:22

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13

In both of these verses, God calls sex between two people of the same gender an abomination. The Law of Moses was the legal code in Israel, and in that nation, this was a capital crime. The sin is still an abomination, but the death sentence will be carried out at the final judgment, not in the here and now, except in nations where it remains a capital crime.

"For this cause, God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet." Romans 1:26-27

"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor EFFEMINATE, nor abusers of themselves with mankind." 1 Corinthians 6:9

Here are the meaning of key words from the original Hebrew and Greek that let us know how God feels about the homosexual lifestyle.

Abomination (toebah) a disgusting thing, abomination, abominable.

Vile (atimia) dishonor, ignominy, disgrace.

unseemly (aschemosyne) indecency, obscenity, shamefulness.

Those words tell us plainly how God views the homosexual lifestyle. I find it strange that any professing Christian stands in opposition to God in defending the homosexual community. In addition to this, in Romans chapter one, it also says homosexuals were given over to a reprobate mind. As a Christian, I am not going to disagree with God.

Whether a person chooses who or what they are attracted to makes no difference as to whether it is approved of by God if they act upon it. As I mentioned, men and women can be married but attracted to someone besides their spouse. God doesn't overlook their adultery if they act upon it. A man may be attracted to a child, but he has no right to molest that child or commit statutory rape because he is attracted to that person. This can't help it stuff is not going to be acceptable at the judgment.

You could get into quite a bit of trouble if you were to read those Bible verses aloud in Australia in public or quote those verses on social media and probably in Canada, NZ and the UK, that's the western world today.

You wouldn't get jailed, but definitely can get sacked or barred from certain job opportunities. Cancel culture certainly don't want to hear or see those verses, they are just about forbidden by secular Australia, and it's crazy how they sometimes turn a blind eye to Islam.

As for Christianity we are living under the covenant of grace, so the OT punishment of stoning is replaced by love thy neighbour, but as for Islam, they are not living under grace, so there is the punishment of execution in some Islamic nations such as Saudi Arabia, and as you recently saw on tv you have a Sunni Muslim country Malaysia, where it is illegal to be gay, recently Matty Healy a singer kissed one of his male bandmates, the music festival was stopped and he got banned from Malaysia, the travel safety website of Australia "smartraveller" even mentions

Malaysia

"Same-sex sexual relations are illegal.

Punishment can include whipping and up to 20 years in prison for same-sex acts involving either men or women."

Saudi Arabia

"Same-sex relationships are illegal. Saudi Arabia doesn't recognise or allow same-sex marriages and rights. Authorities can punish people by jail and even death."

"You will not be able to enter Saudi Arabia if your passport shows 'X' in the gender field."

 

[BarneyFife]

As for Christianity we are living under the covenant of grace, so the OT punishment of stoning is replaced by love thy neighbour,

Hi, Josh!

Actually, the grace we are now experiencing appears to be only a moratorium. God's people have always been required to love their neighbors (Leviticus 19:18). The penalty for evil-doing is simply deferred in the sense that in the absence of theocracy, final punishment alone awaits the unrepentant sinner. The claims of justice do not diminish with mercy. They are simply but terribly transferred to the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

That is not to say there are never consequences for sin, not the least of which is the suffering and dying of Christ on the cross. God still visits the iniquities of the father on the third and fourth generations of those who hate Him (this can be seen in the genetic mutations—especially in humans—that utterly defy and negate the theory of evolution).

Every time someone (even one who ultimately rejects God's grace) has an evil thought, speaks an evil word, or commits an evil deed, what keeps them from expiring then and there is the suffering of The Precious Saviour at Calvary.

 

[TinMan]

Answering your questions never helps. You just fire back more emotional reasoning.

That seems to be what you are doing now.

All you want is an admission that you or someone or some group with whom you are in sympathy has been victimized and that you are justified in what the late Dr. Albert Ellis calls A-to-C thinking. Things are the way they are, regardless of what you or I think or feel. Take a good emotional intelligence (because I am definitely questioning that) test and see if you couldn't use some REBT or CBT (most of us could, so there's no shame in that). If you find all of this condescending, then you probably do. I dare you to reply with some objective expression.

You are mistaken.

"So presenting claims made from made up research is not a lie?"

If someone presents claims with supporting research that they know is fabricated, or even haven't been reasonably careful to verify its scope and meaningfulness, it could be considered false witness, yes.

Thank you for clarifying

"what was the 'bad stuff' exactly?"

Saturating a child's mind with affirmations of "families" that are headed up by people living in violation of the 7th commandment is bad stuff. Occasional things like "F is for family" and "Love is baking a cake" so insubstantially redeem the overall effect of such material as to be negligible.

Are they somehow not families?

I didn't answer your questions before because the predictable nitpicking and goalpost-moving replies are annoying and unproductive to encourage by their acknowledgment.

Also, I can only allow myself to devote so much time to politically-charged discussions.

Its rather sad to think that acknowledging families is politically charged.

 

[TinMan]

There is something else, which the OP addressed. Tinman has embraced the false god of "Science." He's always on about evidence while denying evidence. His Strawman is that he is right unless 'scientific' evidence can be presented, which he summarily dismisses. This, he supposes makes him brilliant.

And what evidence are you speaking of. The evidence that comes from fabricated research?

Blind he is to the full Analysis - Spiritual, Political and Scientific - of the subject matter. He cannot concede on a Christian site that God condemns homosexually. There is the most blatant evidence.

God also condemns lying. So why does the right lie about LGBT individuals so much and so often?

 

[Reggie Belafonte]

Why is it that when a boy has made himself into a girl ? that the media claim that he is a she ? So i first seen this nonsense in womans day mag etc TV etc. Why ! it's a out right lie in fact, so why the cunning, why such outright cunning ?

Is it because of such as the persons wants ? to be seen as a woman ? and truth and reality have to take a back seat !

Why does the truth and reality have to take a back seat ?

I am just stating the reality and truth in fact and i do not like deceptions at all because i believe in reality, because without reality one is lost ! not to mention if one is not founded in reality, i have to dismiss that person as a idiot or a fool. because such a one is all about deceptions, leading others astray.

No one especially a Christian should know not be lead into any deception regardless nor take part in such.

So i say such regardless if it's a deception and i call it out directly, be it to do with money or fraud of any kind i do not give a rats, i call it out directly.

Some show on TV of late they were calling one she ? but it was a man ! born a man ! so i am regardless on the page that such is a man regardless what he has had done still a man in fact.
To me such making claims of being a woman is a out right lie ! Deception ! and i hate any sort of deception.
They have to call such something else, because it's a abomination in regards to real women, or are real women are they that stupid that they do not value their position as being real women ?
Women's rights are being undermined in all this nonsense and women are to stupid to stand up for reality, is that true ? Just on this issue the whole women's rights company objectives comes crashing down ! as all worthless dribbling nonsense. Such is only a Communist organisation foundations anyway. That's the direction they spring from ! not that i am against women's rights at all, but it's where such deceptions are coming from that i call such an organisation out.

A society can not move forward on lies and deceptions, such will only regress into hellfire, because such is Anti-Christ in fact.

 

[Josho]

Hi, Josh!

Actually, the grace we are now experiencing appears to be only a moratorium. God's people have always been required to love their neighbors (Leviticus 19:18). The penalty for evil-doing is simply deferred in the sense that in the absence of theocracy, final punishment alone awaits the unrepentant sinner. The claims of justice do not diminish with mercy. They are simply but terribly transferred to the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

That is not to say there are never consequences for sin, not the least of which is the suffering and dying of Christ on the cross. God still visits the iniquities of the father on the third and fourth generations of those who hate Him (this can be seen in the genetic mutations—especially in humans—that utterly defy and negate the theory of evolution).

Every time someone (even one who ultimately rejects God's grace) has an evil thought, speaks an evil word, or commits an evil deed, what keeps them from expiring then and there is the suffering of The Precious Saviour at Calvary.

Was a late night post that one haha, but yeah, yep there are still consequences, just that stoning is no longer a punishment for sinners in the NT. Other than final punishment on judgement day for unrepentant sinners, you could say ones own actions may be a judgement against themselves, if they get sick or a bad situation as a result of their own actions.

Of course these are all forgivable sins that can be repented of that we are talking about here, thanks to Jesus.

 

[Josho]

Here is what God says about the homosexual lifestyle.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." Leviticus 18:22

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13

In both of these verses, God calls sex between two people of the same gender an abomination. The Law of Moses was the legal code in Israel, and in that nation, this was a capital crime. The sin is still an abomination, but the death sentence will be carried out at the final judgment, not in the here and now, except in nations where it remains a capital crime.

"For this cause, God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet." Romans 1:26-27

"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor EFFEMINATE, nor abusers of themselves with mankind." 1 Corinthians 6:9

So there are obvious verses in the Bible that are gonna offend some people in this world and perhaps maybe even some Christians. Also to mention Sodom and Gommorah can be a highly offensive topic to talk about these days.

@TinMan What are your thoughts of these verses? Should they be spoken about or are they a no go zone? I just wonder how do liberal Christians navigate their way around those verses?

Joe Biden for example is a devout Catholic, attends Mass every Sunday, you may even recall him saying about Trump "I wish he opens it once in a while" in response to Trump ordering protesters to be cleared out so that he can get pic holding up a Bible in front of a church, so Joe must obviously read the Bible going of this.

But I wonder what he thinks when he comes across those verses in the Bible and campaigns for the opposite, I do wonder how he also campaigns for abortion? As there obviously verses in the Bible that don't approve of that action either.

Then you have some liberal Christians who campaign for interfaith, when the Bible clearly says in

Matthew 6:24 "No one can serve two masters..."

Exodus 20

3 “You must not worship any other gods except me.

4 “You must not make any idols. Don’t make any statues or pictures of anything up in the sky or of anything on the earth or of anything down in the water. 5 Don’t worship or serve idols of any kind"....

John 14:6

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.


What do some liberal Christians think when they read verses like this? The inclusive interfaith gospel teaches there are many ways, but the Bible clearly says Jesus is the only way.

Do they believe the Bible is 100% God's word? Do they believe it is flawed and only 80% of it is inspired by God? What do they believe when it comes to reading the Bible?

 

[Wrangler]

And what evidence are you speaking of.

The evidence that X and Y chromosomes alone determined gender.

 

[Wrangler]

God also condemns lying. So why does the Left lie about LGBT individuals so much and so often?

Why is it that when a boy has made himself into a girl ? that the media claim that he is a she ? So i first seen this nonsense in womans day mag etc TV etc. Why ! it's a out right lie in fact, so why the cunning, why such outright cunning ?

Because deception is a tool of evil. The ultimate goal is to prevent us from discerning right from wrong.

Our friend Tinman is always on the attack, just ignoring how is own side lies so much and so often. He thinks if he calls what people say a lie, that makes it a lie. He's lost the capacity to discern truth from lie even when put right in front of his face.

• A female who feels she is a man is properly called a trans-woman.
• A male who feels he is a woman is properly called a trans-man.

These liars demand we alter the language to suit their whim and change the noun. A is A. Just because you use an adjective, A does not become a trans-B. A non-red apple is not a type of orange.

 

[BarneyFife]

Are they somehow not families?

Many of the most traditionally constituted families are "somehow not families." Most of us grow up in one of these.

Its rather sad to think that acknowledging families is politically charged.

The general concept of acknowledging families is not politically charged, so cheer up.

Using our God-given reasoning powers without so much emotional influence can be challenging in the socio-political climate in which we now find ourselves, but it is well worth the effort. The rewards are limitless.

 

[MatthewG]

I dont even follow up with Gay pride parades and stuff like that, but my mom lived with a couple of gay guys when she was growing up, she also had a trans female adoptee she was under, but she said that person was really mean (FOSTER CARE) to her significant other.

So it's all from the heart, and God looks the heart, and do they have pride or humility to see others as important, or deem them less important.

Just like mentally ill people who are sent away from their families into group homes.

Are they important, or are they less then in their heart? Do they come by and visit and seek to have relationship?

 

[TinMan]

So there are obvious verses in the Bible that are gonna offend some people in this world and perhaps maybe even some Christians. Also to mention Sodom and Gommorah can be a highly offensive topic to talk about these days.

@TinMan What are your thoughts of these verses? Should they be spoken about or are they a no go zone? I just wonder how do liberal Christians navigate their way around those verses?

It's not the topic, it is the reason it is being brought up. There is a difference between having a conversation about a passage and using that passage to condemn or to justify prejudice.

 

[TinMan]

The evidence that X and Y chromosomes alone determined gender.

Biological gender is not the same as social gender or the same as gender identity. You are ignoring evidence trying to use one limited definition to apply to all things because of politics and prejudice.

 

[TinMan]

Because deception is a tool of evil. The ultimate goal is to prevent us from discerning right from wrong.

So the meme you posted is a tool of evil.

Our friend Tinman is always on the attack, just ignoring how is own side lies so much and so often. He thinks if he calls what people say a lie, that makes it a lie. He's lost the capacity to discern truth from lie even when put right in front of his face.

So can you explain why claims from made up research is not a lie?

 

[BarneyFife]

Was a late night post that one haha, but yeah, yep there are still consequences, just that stoning is no longer a punishment for sinners in the NT. Other than final punishment on judgement day for unrepentant sinners, you could say ones own actions may be a judgement against themselves, if they get sick or a bad situation as a result of their own actions.

Of course these are all forgivable sins that can be repented of that we are talking about here, thanks to Jesus.

Maybe it's nitpicking, I dunno, but do you think sins that resulted in death by stoning were unforgivable? Could it actually be that everyone who suffered fatal punishment under the ancient Hebrew theocracy also forfeited eternal life?

Some will think me presumptuous to say this, but I have a hard time believing that Uzzah will be lost for spontaneously and reactively trying to prevent the ark of the covenant from being soiled by falling to the ground. He may have been disqualified for eternal life under some other circumstances, but I just believe that mortal punishment under the old covenant, so to speak, should be seen as mostly figurative of perishing as per John 3:16.
.

 

[TinMan]

Many of the most traditionally constituted families are "somehow not families." Most of us grow up in one of these.

You didn't have a family?

The general concept of acknowledging families is not politically charged, so cheer up.

Yet that was your complaint about the books you cited.

 

[BarneyFife]

Our friend Tinman is always on the attack, just ignoring how is own side lies so much and so often. He thinks if he calls what people say a lie, that makes it a lie. He's lost the capacity to discern truth from lie even when put right in front of his face.

How can "our friend" have "his own side?"

This is us-and-them language.
.