setst777 said: Nothing in those verses state that God created some to be good or bad, or created Jacob to love and Esau to hate.
You argue that God's "election" is not a matter of creation, but a matter of selection. In your view, preordination is nothing more than a decision to reward believers with salvation and to punish unbelievers. Each individual must decide for himself, whether to believe or not; and each individual must decide to maintain belief.
“Election” means to “choose.” God chooses to save those who believe in His Son, because His Son died for the sins of the world, so that, all those believing in him may be saved (
John 3:16).
God’s good pleasure is to save those
who believe through the foolish preaching of the Gospel (
1 Corinthians 1:21).
No Scripture teaches that God created anyone repenting and believing; rather, God patiently urges, reasons with, pleads with, commands, admonishes, and warns everyone to repent and believe (
Romans 2:4-6;
Acts 17:30;
Isaiah 1:18-20;
Ezekiel 18:23;
Ezekiel 33:11;
Jeremiah 32:33;
Acts 7:51-57;
Jeremiah 18:10-12;
Matthew 22:3;
Matthew 23:37;
Isaiah 45:21-22;
and so many more).
Accordingly, in your view, God predetermined to love anyone who believed his promise and to hate those who despised it. Since Jacob believed God's promise, God loved him, and since Esau despised his birthright, God hated Esau.
I get your view, but does it square with Paul's argument? Did Paul intend to illustrate the principle that God rewards the good and punishes the bad? No. Not really. Paul removes judgment from the equation.
In
Romans 9, Paul's argument is that:
If by works, we will be judged by the Law - which brings judgment by the Law.
If by our faith, we are made righteous.
Romans 9:30-33 (WEB)
30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, who didn’t follow after righteousness, attained to righteousness, even the righteousness
which is of faith; 31 but Israel, following after a
law of righteousness, didn’t arrive at the law of righteousness. 32
Why? Because they didn’t seek it
by faith, but as it were
by works of the law. They stumbled over the stumbling stone; 33 even as it is written,
“Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and a rock of offense;
and
no one who believes in him will be disappointed.” [
Isaiah 8:14; 28:16]
God tells Rebekah, before her twins were born, that the younger would serve the older. Was this merely a prediction of the future?
The word “prediction” means to "forecast," and insinuates that it may or may not come to pass. When God gives a prophecy about what will happen, then what was prophesied will 100% come to pass (
Deuteronomy 18:22).
No, not entirely. God's word to Rebekah was a promise, indicating his intent to purposely help Jacob and burden Esau.
You are confusing what was promised in Romans 9:9, in contrast to what God prophesied before they were born.
A promise God makes can be conditional. For instance, God promises that whoever believes will be saved, and whoever does not believe remains condemned (
John 3:16-18). In this case, salvation is guaranteed by God as a promise, but only to those who will believe.
And faith does not merit our salvation; but if we try to justify ourselves by the Law, then we will be judged condemned by the Law.
God’s promise to Rebekah was
unconditional; in the sense that, God chose Jacob to be the one through whom "
The Promise" would come, which is
by faith.
He points out that God decided to work things out for the good of Jacob, and work things out for the detriment of Esau. Everything God did for Jacob, gave Jacob the advantage over his brother Esau. And everything God did against Esau put him at a disadvantage.
First of all, God is not unjust for blessing with good things to someone who trusts in God and obeys him.
Proverbs 16:20 (WEB) 20 God blesses those who obey him; happy the man who puts his trust in the Lord.
Yes, God worked out His plan through Jacob through whom “The Promise” would come, which is by faith. Jacob believed God, which God foreknew; and so, God blessed Jacob with special promises as the “firstborn.”
Esau did not express true Faith in God, which God had foreknowledge about before he was born; and so, although God blessed him with descendants through Isaac, God did not allow Esau to be the “firstborn” through whom “
The Promise” would come.
In Paul's mind, the account of Jacob and Esau illustrates the call of God. He writes, ". . . so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls . . ." In Romans 11, Paul will assert that the callings of God are irresistible.
In "
Romans 11:28-29," the Promise is that God's election of Israel is irrevocable, a promise God made because of the faithfulness of the Fathers (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob) through whom the promises were made, not of works, but because of their faith.
Romans 11:28-29 (WEB) 28 Concerning the Good News, they are enemies for your sake. But concerning
the election, they are beloved
for the fathers’ sake. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
However, not everyone who is physically an offspring of Israel is really an Israelite; rather the election is only for the "
Children of the Promise" (
Romans 9:6-8) which is
by faith (
Romans 9:30-33).
Therefore, while God's election of Israel is irrevocable, many in Israel were cut off, because they fell from the faith (
Romans 11:22), but according to
The Promise, those who remain faithful will not be cut off (
Romans 11:22) -
they are the Children of Promise (
Romans 9:6-8).
Romans 11:22 (WEB) 22 See then the goodness and severity of God. Toward those
who fell,
severity; but toward
you,
goodness, if
you continue in his goodness;
otherwise you also will be cut off.
Jacob didn't compel or induce God to work on his behalf. Jacob didn't petition or pray to God that he might help Jacob gain an advantage over Esau.
It was Rebekah who, by faith, deceived Isaac into blessing Jacob instead of Esau. Jacob was hesitant about the idea, but Rebekah convinced him to do it. That was Rebekah doing, but God already foreknew it.
Rather, it was Jacob's "calling" to be the leader of Israel. It was Esau's "calling" to serve his brother. And since God "called" Jacob to be the leader of Israel, God orchestrated Jacob's personal history to Jacob's advantage and to Esau's disadvantage. Understand, God assigns our calling to us before we are born and he orchestrates our personal histories such that we will fulfill our calling.
Yes, God orchestrated events to bring about His plan of salvation, all the way up the chain to Lord Jesus, but the Scriptures do not teach that God created Jacob’s and Esau’s choices. God chose Jacob through whom “The Promise” would come, but this was not independent of what God foreknew about Jacob and Esau before they were born, and planned accordingly.
No Scripture in the entire Bible teaches that God creates all our choices that we will make before we are born; rather, God continually holds each person totally responsible for the choices they make, including Adam and Eve, even though God can foreknow those choices.
setst777 said: You believe that our decision to believe the Gospel after we are born is all God doing, having created some to believe and be saved, and others to hate and condemn, before being born. That is not what “Romans 9” states anywhere; rather, that is your assumption.
On the contrary, that is my conclusion -- not my assumption.
Thank you for sharing your conclusion.
By faith doesn't mean "because of faith."
No such distinction is made in Scripture. I provided for you examples of the faith of Job, Isaac, Abraham, all of whom God commended and blessed for their faith. The fact is, God’s desire is to save those who believe in Lord Jesus. There is no Scripture that states God creates faith in some to be saved and not others.
Nevertheless, Lord Jesus said that the Father love us {{{“
because”}}}
we “
love” Lord Jesus, and “
because”
we have
believed – so that settles it; your entire position fails.
John 16:27 for the Father himself loves
you, {{{
because}}}
you have
loved me, and
have believed that I came from God.
Why does the Father love us? Not because God created us to love and believe in Lord Jesus, but God loves us
because we love and
believe in him. So, your doctrine falls.