Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Written to and about the unbelieving Jews of His time.“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.”
(John 6:44, ESV)
Written to and about the unbelieving Jews of His time.
Imagine if you were a believing Jew in His time in love with the law of Moses.
And then there comes a man who calls Himself the Son of God, who forgives sins, who said -- I and the Father are One --, someone who puts your world upside down.
Are you 100% sure you would not pick up stones? Because that's what the Law of Moses ordered.
So yes, special revelation from God was needed to believe in Jesus was the promised Messiah, reading a few verses further we see the evidence and answer :
John 6:65 And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”
John 6:66 After this many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him.
John 6:67 So Jesus said to the Twelve, “Do you want to go away as well?”
John 6:68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,
John 6:69 and we have believed, and have come to know, that you are the Holy One of God.”
John 6:70 Jesus answered them, “Did I not choose you, the Twelve? And yet one of you is a devil.”
I am not raised as an orthodox Jew, I was raised with the Bible. No problem with Jesus.Is what Jesus said applicable or not applicable to Jews and non-Jews in our time?
I am not raised as an orthodox Jew, I was raised with the Bible. No problem with Jesus.
To anyone who has a problem with Jesus, he/she needs special revelation from God. I think that is the message of John 6.What about others? Would you say that what Jesus said is applicable or not applicable to us?
Absolutely.What about others? Would you say that what Jesus said is applicable or not applicable to us?
I was curious why you underlined in green a portion of your quote of John 6:70; for a notable reason I assumed.Written to and about the unbelieving Jews of His time.
Imagine if you were a believing Jew in His time in love with the law of Moses.
And then there comes a man who calls Himself the Son of God, who forgives sins, who said -- I and the Father are One --, someone who puts your world upside down.
Are you 100% sure you would not pick up stones? Because that's what the Law of Moses ordered.
So yes, special revelation from God was needed to believe in Jesus was the promised Messiah, reading a few verses further we see the evidence and answer :
John 6:65 And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”
John 6:66 After this many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him.
John 6:67 So Jesus said to the Twelve, “Do you want to go away as well?”
John 6:68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,
John 6:69 and we have believed, and have come to know, that you are the Holy One of God.”
John 6:70 Jesus answered them, “Did I not choose you, the Twelve? And yet one of you is a devil.”
“No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.”
(John 6:44, ESV)
There was nothing special in the green other than some cosmetic makeup. The point I am trying to make is that there can not be any contradiction in the Gospel. John 6:44 has split Christianity into 2 camps, I guess you know what I mean with that, Calvinism, people being unable to come to Christ versus :I was curious why you underlined in green a portion of your quote of John 6:70; for a notable reason I assumed.
Somehow I get the inkling that you might believe that when Jesus said of his Father that he the only one who draws people to him, you somehow have squeezed Jesus into the picture as saying Jesus had the same authority as his Father to draw people to himself. (remembering also the Cross drawing others to Christ is an entirely different matter and context)
And then you might conclude, if this condition was not true, then there is a contradiction in the verses John 6:44 along with John 6:65 that say only the Father draws, or really chooses, as in John 6:70 Jesus chose his apostles; as Jesus seemingly being of equal status with the same authority as his Father to draw others to him.
If you thought this as so, or not, then the obvious Biblical response and solution is that there is first, no contradiction at all between these verses. If the Father did not approve of the 12 apostles, then Jesus would know to pick others for the father's approval. I believe that when Jesus said he chose the 12 in verse 70, he knew already his Father had approved of them first. And even Judas for a reason.
Now if you have underlined in green in verse 70, those words for another reason, then I do not know what for, and then it does not raise my curiosity at all.
Good Day..
This..
Jesus said.....>"if i be lifted up.... (on the Cross) I will draw ALL people to me"...
Now, there are 2 perspectives of "lifted up"....on The Cross.
One is.....>The Actual Literal Sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross.
#2 is...>>"the Preaching of the Cross".. as "the Gospel" as this also ""Lifts UP Jesus""", when its "preached" or "taught" So.......when this is happening Jesus, (the Holy Spirit), will "draw" the listener unto Himself.
The point I am trying to make is that there can not be any contradiction in the Gospel. John 6:44 has split Christianity into 2 camps, I guess you know what I mean with that, Calvinism, people being unable to come to Christ versus :
Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort experienced when holding two or more conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes, leading to a motivation to reduce the inconsistency.
Oh, can't there be any contradictions in the Bible?
I've seen John 6:44 bandied around as a proof-text for TULIP so many times, I almost dread seeing it. And I specifically remember Johnnie Mac's commentary on that verse in The MacArthur Study Bible endorsing cognitive dissonance and accepting the inherent biblical contradiction between God's sovereignty and Man's responsibility.
Not "tension". MacArthur said "contradiction". And prefixing "apparent" to "contradiction" is just a weasel-word to deny that the contradiction really does exist.
Except most of us can't live indefinitely with cognitive dissonance. So, we end up falling on one side or the other.