Can a tare become saved?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You do a great job of... displaying, I guess... otherwise. <smile> Maybe you could prove that by, you know, just letting it go, by dropping it... <smile>
Dude, your reading comprehension skills are not good. I explained what does bother me and what doesn't, so there's nothing to drop in relation to what doesn't bother me. Good grief.

I didn't say that. I said you made at least one or two Arminian-sounding statements. That's all. Dude, come on. Drop it.
Dude, you are so incredibly dishonest. You called my soteriology "Arminian soteriology". Denial isn't just a river in Egypt. It's your middle name.

Okay, fine; that makes them... bad Calvinists. <smile> That is very un-Calvinistic.
No, it turns out that something you said later in your post is exactly what I said they were saying. LOL. I need to go back to not talking to you again. What a waste of time.

Well, I guess I would be... if that were actually what I was saying... LOL!

Okay. Case closed. Hopefully. My goodness.
How is it not what you were saying? Wait...forget it. I don't care.

In what I said, I was not really talking about the parable itself, but just the differing senses in which people may think about the wheat and the tares... really more so Christians and non-Christians at any given time, and I was clear on that. I was really trying to help folks realize, "hey, maybe there's not such an opposite-sides-of-the-fence thing going on here..." It seems to me there's really not.
I'm simply saying that if you look at the parable a certain way as some do, it can cause a contradiction with other scripture. Clearly, children of the devil, as the tares are described (Matthew 13:38) can become children of the kingdom, as the wheat are described. That happens every time a lost sinner (child of the devil - 1 John 3:8-10) becomes saved.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Dude, your reading comprehension skills are not good.
<eyeroll>

I explained what does bother me and what doesn't...
You did, but actions speak louder than words. The fact that you keep going on about it tells me otherwise. But, really, who cares?

...there's nothing to drop in relation to what doesn't bother me.
I agree. <smile> But that's... not what I was talking about. <smile>

Good grief.
Good grief! <pounds the table; smile>

Dude, you are so incredibly dishonest.
<eyeroll>

You called my soteriology "Arminian soteriology"
Again, perception is not always reality. It's really no big deal, but you perceived what I said wrongly... you misunderstood what I was saying. And that happens; it's no big deal. Well... should be no big deal anyway... <smile> And you know, I'll be happy to take the blame for conveying the wrong message, but no, I did not.

. Denial isn't just a river in Egypt. It's your middle name.
<eyeroll>

No, it turns out that something you said later in your post is exactly what I said they were saying. LOL.
Which was? <chuckles> Nope. That would have made me a bad Calvinist. <smile>

I need to go back to not talking to you again.
Ohhhh, but you just can't help it. I get it. <smile>

What a waste of time.
I agree. <smile> In addition to saying stupid things, you're wasting our time. <smile>

How is it not what you were saying?
<eyeroll> Maybe you could just take my word for it, yeah?

Wait...forget it. I don't care.
Apparently you do. Maybe if you say that to yourself enough, maybe you'll start to believe it. But still, actions speak louder than words... <smile>

I'm simply saying that if you look at the parable a certain way as some do, it can cause a contradiction with other scripture.
And to this... and this is what I was saying before... outside of the context of the parable itself, there is more than one sense that people can see wheat and tares, ergo, what those on the two sides of the fence were saying was not untrue, if their context in saying the two seemingly opposite things was what it seemed to be. It seems to me that's not that difficult to understand.

Clearly, children of the devil, as the tares are described (Matthew 13:38) can become children of the kingdom, as the wheat are described. That happens every time a lost sinner (child of the devil - 1 John 3:8-10) becomes saved.
I totally agree, SI, and I actually think the ones who seemed to be on the opposite side of the fence as you might agree, too, if they were speaking in the same context as you, but they were not. That was my point. Their context was different, so I think it is entirely possible that both you and they were right. If they were to place what they said in your context, then they would acknowledge that what they were saying was wrong in that context. Likewise, I think if you were to place what you were saying in their context, then you would acknowledge that what you were saying was wrong in that context. You see?

Grace and peace to you.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You did, but actions speak louder than words. The fact that you keep going on about it tells me otherwise. But, really, who cares?
I don't keep going on about the thing that didn't bother me that you thought bothered me. But, naturally, you don't care if you misrepresent what I was saying.

Which was? <chuckles> Nope. That would have made me a bad Calvinist. <smile>
Let me answer the question instead of you answering it for me. The point was that those bad Calvinists, with which you agree, say that if faith comes from us rather than God giving it to us, then that can be called works based salvation despite the fact that faith is contrasted with the works that don't save us in scripture. You agree with those bad Calvinists that if someone believes that faith is our own faith rather than God giving it to us, then it means that person is believing in works based salvation. So, I guess you too are a bad Calvinist.

Ohhhh, but you just can't help it. I get it. <smile>
I like to correct your mistakes. Yes, it's hard to resist that.

I agree. <smile> In addition to saying stupid things, you're wasting our time. <smile>
Look at holier than thou PinSeeker telling me I'm saying stupid things. Now, that wasn't very nice, Mr. PinSeeker. Go in the corner and think about what you've done.

<eyeroll> Maybe you could just take my word for it, yeah?
Nah, I don't take your word for anything because you say too many stupid things for me to just take your word for anything.

And to this... and this is what I was saying before... outside of the context of the parable itself, there is more than one sense that people can see wheat and tares, ergo, what those on the two sides of the fence were saying was not untrue, if their context in saying the two seemingly opposite things was what it seemed to be. It seems to me that's not that difficult to understand.
I agree, yet we have a few posters here who cannot understand what you're saying here. But, I do because it's the same thing I've been trying to tell them.

I totally agree, SI, and I actually think the ones who seemed to be on the opposite side of the fence as you might agree, too, if they were speaking in the same context as you, but they were not. That was my point. Their context was different, so I think it is entirely possible that both you and they were right. If they were to place what they said in your context, then they would acknowledge that what they were saying was wrong in that context. Likewise, I think if you were to place what you were saying in their context, then you would acknowledge that what you were saying was wrong in that context. You see?
Yes, but the point is that we need to look at the parable of the wheat and tares from the right perspective or we can cause contradictions with other scripture. To look at the parable and decide that children of the devil cannot be saved and become children of the kingdom is a clear case of not looking at the parable the right way and missing the point of the parable.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't keep going on about the thing that didn't bother me that you thought bothered me. But, naturally, you don't care if you misrepresent what I was saying.
LOL! You know, at this point, I'm just getting a kick out of keeping you going. <smile> Obviously, it bothers you, and you can't let it go; it's kind of funny at this point. <chuckles>

Let me answer the question instead of you answering it for me.
To be honest, I really don't even remember asking a question.

Oh, wait, now I remember... but I didn't really ask you a question at all; I was very explicit in saying that by doing so, I was just making a point, and not asking for any kind of answer. But by all means, keep going... <smile>

The point was that those bad Calvinists, with which you agree, say that if faith comes from us rather than God giving it to us, then that can be called works based salvation...
Good Calvinists wouldn't say this at all, Spiritual Israelite. Quite the opposite. And I've been very clear about this. But... yeah, keep going...

despite the fact that faith is contrasted with the works that don't save us in scripture.
Which is absolutely a fact, which I've been very clear about. But keep going...

You agree with those bad Calvinists that if someone believes that faith is our own faith rather than God giving it to us, then it means that person is believing in works based salvation.
Hmmm, well it is our own faith, in that yes, God has given us this assurance, and we have it and are convicted of it... that conviction being of the Holy Spirit. Which I've said many times. So no, I don't agree with those... bad Calvinists; no good Calvinist believes other than what I've said here, and like I said, many times previous. Behold, who is without question not a Calvinist, was the one saying what you're saying here about "bad Calvinists," and he was the one I was so strongly debating on that point. So now the question is... and again, rhetorical... how long are you going to keep attributing otherwise to me? But... I don't care.

Oh, wait, I do care... I care a whole lot... like I so super-care! I need to keep you going, for humor's sake, you know... <smile>

So, I guess you too are a bad Calvinist.
Well now that depends on the sense in which you mean "bad"... LOL! I mean, HEY! I'M SUPER-BAD! OWWWWWW! (my best James Brown scream) <grin> Get up offa dat thing! <smile>

I like to correct your mistakes. Yes, it's hard to resist that.
And I like to keep you thinking you are... and going, and going, and going...

Look at holier than thou PinSeeker telling me I'm saying stupid things.
I mean, it is what it is... LOL! I mean the stupid things you say, of course... <smile>

Now, that wasn't very nice, Mr. PinSeeker.
You're right, but it was fun. <smile> Then again, for you to say this is... kind of hypocritical... LOL!

Go in the corner and think about what you've done.
Well, my computer is in a corner of this big room. That counts, right?

Nah, I don't take your word for anything because you say too many stupid things for me to just take your word for anything.
Ah, okay, even though you agree with me quite a bit. Gotcha...

I agree, yet we have a few posters here who cannot understand what you're saying here.
I think it's more because they just don't want to.

But, I do because it's the same thing I've been trying to tell them.
giphy.gif


Yes, but the point is that we need to look at the parable of the wheat and tares from the right perspective....
Sure, but it's perfectly okay to talk about "wheat" and "tares" in general.

To look at the parable and decide that children of the devil cannot be saved and become children of the kingdom is a clear case of not looking at the parable the right way and missing the point of the parable.
Right, but again, there is a sense in which the tares will never become children of the living God ~ from the perspective of... or, well, in view of God's sovereignty; they are vessels prepared for destruction, as Paul puts it. So in that sense, tares cannot ~ in the sense of will not ~ become wheat.

What you say here, though, is in a different sense, that being from our perspective and the knowledge that none of is deserving of salvation, but even so God does, according to His grace, foreknow (forelove), predestine, call, justify, and glorify those He has chosen before the foundation of the world. And in this latter sense, yes, many tares will become wheat.

So, like I said several posts ago, depending on the sense in which it is said, both are true.

And I think you agree. But if you don't, well, fair enough. <smile>

Grace and peace to you.

Oh wait, I need to say something mean, so I can keep you going... <smile>

Grace and peace to you.
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LOL! You know, at this point, I'm just getting a kick out of keeping you going. <smile> Obviously, it bothers you, and you can't let it go; it's kind of funny at this point. <chuckles>
That's rather evil of you to purposely try to bother me. That seems like something a wicked person would do. But, don't worry about it. You believe you are predestined to eternal salvation, so you can sin all you want and it won't make any difference. No need to repent of wickedly trying to bother other people for no other reason than to get enjoyment out of it. Satan gets enjoyment out of that, too. Maybe he is your father and you don't even realize it. How would you know? You don't. According to you, that's not up to you to decide, so you can only hope you are one of the lucky ones. You may have only deluded yourself into believing you're one of them. We'll just have to wait and see. Cross your fingers!

1747766509325.gif
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That's rather evil of you to purposely try to bother me. That seems like something a wicked person would do.
LOL! Knew you couldn't resist... <smile>

But, don't worry about it.
Yeah, not. <smile>
You believe you are predestined to eternal salvation, so you can sin all you want and it won't make any difference.
Nope. Neither did John Calvin...

No need to repent of wickedly trying to bother other people for no other reason than to get enjoyment out of it. Satan gets enjoyment out of that, too. Maybe he is your father and you don't even realize it. How would you know? You don't. According to you, that's not up to you to decide...
Yes, I certainly can't elect myself, as Arminians believe. Adrian Rogers... you know him? I mean, he died not too long ago, but a radio preacher... Love Worth Finding Ministries... very Arminian he was. One of his most famous quotes was, "You want to be predestined? Well choose you this day..." As if we can force God to predestine us to be conformed to the image of Christ and thus save ourselves, really, as if ~ in direct opposition to Paul in Romans 9:16 that being among God's elect really does depend on man's willing and running... But that's Arminianism...

Anyhoo... Yes, I can be assured of my salvation by the Lord; that's what faith is.

, so you can only hope you are one of the lucky ones.
Assured. I can rest assured that my Father is the living God, my elder Brother Jesus Christ, and my Helper the Holy Spirit. This is what faith is... the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. And the assurance of God is as solid as it can possibly be. Thanks be to God.

And to what you say above, since I have the Holy Spirit, my desire is no longer to do the will of my former father the devil, but to do the will of my Father in heaven. I presume the same is true of you. Being saved is certainly not any kind of "license to sin"... Paul speaks to that, too:

"What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin still live in it? Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with Him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:1-4).​

Good old Paul, he thought of everything... <smile> Well. The Holy Spirit did, and breathed it into Paul...

Anyway, yes,because of the new spirit in us ~ and because we have the Spirit, who is at work in us ~ our inclination is not to sin, but to glorify God. We still fail from time to time of course, but if we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive. So we live a life of repentance; it's not just a one-time thing, for sure, but rather in this life continual. But the Holy Spirit is growing us in that way. Again, thanks be to God.

You may have only deluded yourself into believing you're one of them. We'll just have to wait and see. Cross your fingers!
Oh, there's no such thing as luck... <smile>

Grace and peace to you.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LOL! Knew you couldn't resist... <smile>
It's funny that you would try to keep getting me to respond, knowing that I'm just going to make a fool out of you and your false doctrine again if I do. You're a glutton for punishment, I guess.

Oh, there's no such thing as luck... <smile>
Yes, there's no such thing as luck to the Calvinist. My mistake. Unbelievers will not be tormented for eternity because of bad luck. It's exactly what God had planned for them from the beginning of the world because He inexplicably hates them. We can't attribute His hate for them to them just having back luck that He hates them. I'm sure He has a good reason to hate them despite them not having any choice but to never repent because of their "total depravity" that they were born with, which was, obviously, out of their control. Despite them somehow having no excuse not to glorify God as God and no excuse for not being thankful to Him (Romans 1:18-21). Being "totally depraved" sure seems like an excuse for that, but let's just leave that up to being another one of those unexplained mysteries that Calvinism is based on.

Scripture says "God is love" (1 John 4:9). Period. Calvinism says "God is part love AND part hate". I choose with my free will to accept scripture instead of Calvinism.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It's funny that you would try to keep getting me to respond...
Kind of both, really... to just see how long I can keep you going... how many is this now? LOL! ... and trying to get you to quit making a fool of yourself. But so it goes... and goes and goes and goes... <smile>

, knowing that I'm just going to make a fool out of you...
Well, that you're going to keep trying to paint it that way, but still every time putting another coat of paint on yourself in that corner you're in...

and your false doctrine...
...ah, which you keep stating the opposite of what it is and then agreeing with what it really is...

You're a glutton for punishment, I guess.
A glutton for humor... Laughing is a good thing...

Yes, there's no such thing as luck to the Calvinist.
Yep, God's in control, and works everything together for the good of those who love him and are called according to His purpose. That's Romans 8:28, of course. Just once I would like someone to prove the concept of luck or chance to me. I mean, is it luck when a basketball player makes a half-court shot at the buzzer to win? Well, no, because he or she put just the right arc and force and touch on the ball for it to go through the hoop, so just physics and geometry prove it wasn't luck. Would he or she only have made that shot one time out of a hundred or a thousand? Well maybe, but that matters not. Just a simple illustration, but surely sufficient. Nothing happens in this universe that God doesn't direct or allow; nothing, absolutely nothing, occurs outside of His will.

"Who then is this, that He commands even winds and water, and they obey Him?"

Or, as He "questions" Job:

"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Dress for action like a man; I will question you, and you make it known to Me. Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements ~ surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it? On what were its bases sunk, or who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy? Or who shut in the sea with doors when it burst out from the womb, when I made clouds its garment and thick darkness its swaddling band, and prescribed limits for it and set bars and doors, and said, ‘Thus far shall you come, and no farther, and here shall your proud waves be stayed’? Have you commanded the morning since your days began, and caused the dawn to know its place, that it might take hold of the skirts of the earth, and the wicked be shaken out of it? It is changed like clay under the seal, and its features stand out like a garment. From the wicked their light is withheld, and their uplifted arm is broken. Have you entered into the springs of the sea, or walked in the recesses of the deep? Have the gates of death been revealed to you, or have you seen the gates of deep darkness? Have you comprehended the expanse of the earth? Declare, if you know all this..."

And on and on and on... And finally Job falls on His knees three chapters later:

"I know that You can do all things, and that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted... Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know... I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees You; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."

My mistake.
Yes. Agreed.

Unbelievers will not be tormented for eternity because of bad luck. It's exactly what God had planned for them from the beginning of the world because He inexplicably hates them.
Well this is what folks of any degree of Arminian influence say, because their so schnockered by and heavily personally invested in at least three of his five objections. But it's just a silly caricature, really.

We can't attribute His hate for them to them just having back luck that He hates them. I'm sure He has a good reason to hate them despite them not having any choice but to never repent because of their "total depravity" that they were born with, which was, obviously, out of their control.
This is where it all starts, every time, really, There's a reason why this was Arminius's first objection. He had to start with a terrible underestimation of the effects of the Fall of Adam and Eve on mankind. If he and all those that have come after him understood this, then the dominoes might start to fall.

Now, "out of their control"... in a sense yes, but in another sense no. Adam was not deceived, only Eve was. But Adam was there, and he knew what God said, but said and did nothing. But he disobeyed God... and did not fulfill his responsibility to God for Eve and keep her from sinning; all of this is why Adam's sin (as head of his wife) was much greater than Eve's. And Adam was the federal head of the human race, so representing all of us in the Garden. And just as God had told him in Genesis 2:17, he died ~ not physically, but a real, spiritual death ~ that very day.. It was his sin that plunged the entire human race into this state ~ at enmity with God, spiritually dead. That natural state of man is so often so vastly underestimated.

Despite them somehow having no excuse not to glorify God as God and no excuse for not being thankful to Him (Romans 1:18-21).
Right, what can be known about God has been clearly seen in all of creation by all from the beginning. But so many exchange the truth for a lie and worship creation instead.

Being "totally depraved" sure seems like an excuse for that...
For sure, every person, as a consequence of the Fall (the sin of Adam and Eve), is born with a sinful nature that affects all areas of their being ~ mind, will, emotions, and flesh. But that has no bearing on the fact that, as Paul says in Romans 1, what can be known about God they cannot know; Paul say it is plain to them, because God has shown it to them, but they still have exchanged the truth for a lie, which is a voluntary act on their part, and it is this for which they have no excuse. An act of free will, which, I know, is a very precious thing to you... (me, too, actually). <smile> God certainly gave us free will, and we often misuse it, even those of us who have been born again of the Spirit...

, but let's just leave that up to being another one of those unexplained mysteries that Calvinism is based on.
HAHA! No mystery at all.

Scripture says "God is love" (1 John 4:9). Period.
Yes, and we (Christians) love because God first loved us. But regarding unbelievers, God could just take them out, right? But yet what He does, concerning unbelievers, is endure them with much patience, even giving them over to their own selfish passions and desires, and all the while giving them grace. Not the grace of salvation of course, but sometimes even great measures of grace.

The above is in this life. But there will come a time when His perfect justice will be upheld, once and for all, and this is according to His glory. But in all this is love. Even this punishment of unbelievers in eternity, though it may not seem this way to us in our finite minds, is administered in love. He gives them life in the first place (this is love), and He endures them in great patience and gives them up to themselves, and even gives them great measures of grace (this is love), and finally, gives them what they have chosen for themselves (this is love), and even His execution of judgment in eternity is love. God loves all of His creation, but administers that love differently, even in eternity. Yes, God is love. Just not our exceedingly small idea of love... His thoughts are not our thoughts, His ways not ours.

Calvinism says "God is part love AND part hate"
Ah, well, God is not part anything. And hate is not the opposite of love, or even opposed to it, but a different expression of it. The opposite of love is indifference, not caring, and God is not ever indifferent or uncaring about anything.

I choose with my free will to accept scripture instead of Calvinism"
Well, in addition to your free will, if you would start actually using your brain, that would be awesome. <smile> Like I have said, you may not consider yourself an Arminian, but you at least carry quite a bit of that... baggage...

Grace and peace to you.
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Kind of both, really... to just see how long I can keep you going... how many is this now? LOL! ... and trying to get you to quit making a fool of yourself. But so it goes... and goes and goes and goes... <smile>


Well, that you're going to keep trying to paint it that way, but still every time putting another coat of paint on yourself in that corner you're in...


...ah, which you keep stating the opposite of what it is and then agreeing with what it really is...


A glutton for humor... Laughing is a good thing...


Yep, God's in control, and works everything together for the good of those who love him and are called according to His purpose. That's Romans 8:28, of course. Just once I would like someone to prove the concept of luck or chance to me. I mean, is it luck when a basketball player makes a half-court shot at the buzzer to win? Well, no, because he or she put just the right arc and force and touch on the ball for it to go through the hoop, so just physics and geometry prove it wasn't luck. Would he or she only have made that shot one time out of a hundred or a thousand? Well maybe, but that matters not. Just a simple illustration, but surely sufficient. Nothing happens in this universe that God doesn't direct or allow; nothing, absolutely nothing, occurs outside of His will.

"Who then is this, that He commands even winds and water, and they obey Him?"

Or, as He "questions" Job:

"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Dress for action like a man; I will question you, and you make it known to Me. Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements ~ surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it? On what were its bases sunk, or who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy? Or who shut in the sea with doors when it burst out from the womb, when I made clouds its garment and thick darkness its swaddling band, and prescribed limits for it and set bars and doors, and said, ‘Thus far shall you come, and no farther, and here shall your proud waves be stayed’? Have you commanded the morning since your days began, and caused the dawn to know its place, that it might take hold of the skirts of the earth, and the wicked be shaken out of it? It is changed like clay under the seal, and its features stand out like a garment. From the wicked their light is withheld, and their uplifted arm is broken. Have you entered into the springs of the sea, or walked in the recesses of the deep? Have the gates of death been revealed to you, or have you seen the gates of deep darkness? Have you comprehended the expanse of the earth? Declare, if you know all this..."

And on and on and on... And finally Job falls on His knees three chapters later:

"I know that You can do all things, and that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted... Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know... I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees You; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."


Yes. Agreed.


Well this is what folks of any degree of Arminian influence say, because their so schnockered by and heavily personally invested in at least three of his five objections. But it's just a silly caricature, really.


This is where it all starts, every time, really, There's a reason why this was Arminius's first objection. He had to start with a terrible underestimation of the effects of the Fall of Adam and Eve on mankind. If he and all those that have come after him understood this, then the dominoes might start to fall.

Now, "out of their control"... in a sense yes, but in another sense no. Adam was not deceived, only Eve was. But Adam was there, and he knew what God said, but said and did nothing. But he disobeyed God... and did not fulfill his responsibility to God for Eve and keep her from sinning; all of this is why Adam's sin (as head of his wife) was much greater than Eve's. And Adam was the federal head of the human race, so representing all of us in the Garden. And just as God had told him in Genesis 2:17, he died ~ not physically, but a real, spiritual death ~ that very day.. It was his sin that plunged the entire human race into this state ~ at enmity with God, spiritually dead. That natural state of man is so often so vastly underestimated.


Right, what can be known about God has been clearly seen in all of creation by all from the beginning. But so many exchange the truth for a lie and worship creation instead.


For sure, every person, as a consequence of the Fall (the sin of Adam and Eve), is born with a sinful nature that affects all areas of their being ~ mind, will, emotions, and flesh. But that has no bearing on the fact that, as Paul says in Romans 1, what can be known about God they cannot know; Paul say it is plain to them, because God has shown it to them, but they still have exchanged the truth for a lie, which is a voluntary act on their part, and it is this for which they have no excuse. An act of free will, which, I know, is a very precious thing to you... (me, too, actually). <smile> God certainly gave us free will, and we often misuse it, even those of us who have been born again of the Spirit...


HAHA! No mystery at all.


Yes, and we (Christians) love because God first loved us. But regarding unbelievers, God could just take them out, right? But yet what He does, concerning unbelievers, is endure them with much patience, even giving them over to their own selfish passions and desires, and all the while giving them grace. Not the grace of salvation of course, but sometimes even great measures of grace.

The above is in this life. But there will come a time when His perfect justice will be upheld, once and for all, and this is according to His glory. But in all this is love. Even this punishment of unbelievers in eternity, though it may not seem this way to us in our finite minds, is administered in love. He gives them life in the first place (this is love), and He endures them in great patience and gives them up to themselves, and even gives them great measures of grace (this is love), and finally, gives them what they have chosen for themselves (this is love), and even His execution of judgment in eternity is love. God loves all of His creation, but administers that love differently, even in eternity. Yes, God is love. Just not our exceedingly small idea of love... His thoughts are not our thoughts, His ways not ours.


Ah, well, God is not part anything. And hate is not the opposite of love, or even opposed to it, but a different expression of it. The opposite of love is indifference, not caring, and God is not ever indifferent or uncaring about anything.


Well, in addition to your free will, if you would start actually using your brain, that would be awesome. <smile> Like I have said, you may not consider yourself an Arminian, but you at least carry quite a bit of that... baggage...

Grace and peace to you.
Hey, dummy, can you turn your brain on and tell me why you think people have enough free will to choose whether or not to glorify God as God and to be thankful to Him while having no excuse for not doing so, but they don't have enough free will to decide whether or not to accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior? Search your puny mind for that answer and see what you can come up with.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ah, well, God is not part anything. And hate is not the opposite of love, or even opposed to it, but a different expression of it. The opposite of love is indifference, not caring, and God is not ever indifferent or uncaring about anything.
1747794677749.gif

So, are you looking forward to when God shows how much He cares about the lost when He has them cast into the lake of fire where they will be tormented for eternity? If that doesn't describe a God who is love, then I don't know what does. I'm sure you agree.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So, are you looking forward to when God shows how much He cares about the lost when He has them cast into the lake of fire where they will be tormented for eternity? If that doesn't describe a God who is love, then I don't know what does. I'm sure you agree.
Such lack of understanding and ignorance. Astounding, really... astonishing. But yes, very Arminian.

Grace and peace to you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Spiritual Israelite

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Such lack of understanding and ignorance. Astounding, really... astonishing. But yes, very Arminian.
Calvinists never like it when the implications and ramifications of their doctrine are spelled out like that. It makes them very uncomfortable when it is pointed out how they contradict the character of God.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,470
860
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Calvinists never like it when the implications and ramifications of their doctrine are spelled out…
Wrongly, yes.

It makes them very uncomfortable…
No, that’s not it…. LOL!

when it is pointed out how they contradict the character of God.
That’s a strange statement to make, considering that for the last several posts you’ve state the exact opposite of what Calvinists believe about this or that and then have clarified what you think is correct, and it’s right along the lines of what Calvinists actually believe concerning that particular thing.

I don’t mean this in a bad way or to be insulting at all, really, but you’re a mixed bag, SI. It’s such an odd mix of Arminian and Calvinistic understandings, some not so good and others pretty good, actually. You’re definitely… interesting… I’ll give you that. But very self-contradictory.

Grace and peace to you.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That’s a strange statement to make, considering that for the last several posts you’ve state the opposite of what Calvinists believe about this or that and then have clarified what you think is correct, and it’s right along the lines of what Calvinists believe concerning that particular thing.
Say what now? What did I say that isn't true about what you believe?

You think that salvation is entirely up to God's choice and not up to man's choice at all, right? I know you believe that God is the Creator of all things. And you believe that people are created with "total depravity" in the sense that they have no ability to ever do anything that God commands them to do, such as to believe and repent, without Him giving them faith and repentance that is then guaranteed to result in them believing and repenting. Right?

So, you think that God, who is love (1 John 4:8), decided to save some and not even offer any opportunity at all for the rest to be saved, which scripture indicates is the majority of people (Matt 7:13-14, Matt 22:14). So, that means you believe it was God's will and His choice that a majority of people would end up suffering eternal torment. How does that not mean that you believe that God hates those people, like you believe He hates Esau, for no real reason? Which would then mean, in your view, God is partially love and partially hate. Or partially love and partially indifferent and uncaring, if you prefer. But, scripture just simply says that "God is love" (1 John 4:8). I would expect a God who is love to at least give all people the opportunity to be saved.

Scripture does say that He loved the whole world enough that He sent His Son to die for the sins of the whole world so that anyone who believes in Him would not perish, but have eternal life (John 3:16, 1 John 2:1-2). So, that seems clear to me that His intention was to give everyone in the world a legitimate opportunity to be saved. And He did. He graciously offers salvation to all people (Titus 2:11). But, in your view, that offer is not genuine because no one who is totally depraved from birth can possibly accept that offer. So, you make God out to be someone who hates, or, at best, does not care about the majority of people He creates, and you make Him out to be someone who makes disingenuous offers to people.

I don’t mean this in a bad way or to be insulting at all, really, but you’re a mixed bag, SI.
I don't mean this in a bad way or to be insulting at all, but I don't care what you think because it's not true.

It’s such an odd mix of Arminian and Calvinistic understandings, some not so good and others pretty good, actually. You’re definitely… interesting… I’ll give you that. But very self-contradictory.
How am I contradicting myself? You made the claim, so back it up. Tell me a couple ways that you think I'm contradicting myself so that I can know why you are saying this.

Is it not possible that both belief systems contain some truth even though they disagree on the TULIP doctrines and such? For example, I put a major emphasis on God's sovereignty, as do Calvinists. Yet, I'm not a Calvinist. Does that fact alone make my view contradictory? Of course not. I just understand His sovereignty differently than Calvinists do in some ways (and agree in other ways). To me, man is required to choose whether or not to repent and believe because God sovereignly chose to make man responsible to do that.

Also, I put a major emphasis on the fact that we are not saved by works or else we could boast (Ephesians 2:8-9, etc.). So do Calvinists. Yet, I'm not a Calvinist. Why not? Because, unlike Calvinists, I do not see faith, which is something we are responsible to do, as scripture teaches (Acts 16:30-31, John 6:27-29), as being of the type of works that do not save us. But, Calvinists think faith would be of that type of work that doesn't save if it was possible for someone to choose to repent and believe rather than being something that God has to give someone in order for them to believe.
 
Last edited:

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,879
5,421
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
It's funny that you would try to keep getting me to respond, knowing that I'm just going to make a fool out of you and your false doctrine again if I do. You're a glutton for punishment, I guess.


Yes, there's no such thing as luck to the Calvinist. My mistake. Unbelievers will not be tormented for eternity because of bad luck. It's exactly what God had planned for them from the beginning of the world because He inexplicably hates them. We can't attribute His hate for them to them just having back luck that He hates them. I'm sure He has a good reason to hate them despite them not having any choice but to never repent because of their "total depravity" that they were born with, which was, obviously, out of their control. Despite them somehow having no excuse not to glorify God as God and no excuse for not being thankful to Him (Romans 1:18-21). Being "totally depraved" sure seems like an excuse for that, but let's just leave that up to being another one of those unexplained mysteries that Calvinism is based on.

Scripture says "God is love" (1 John 4:9). Period. Calvinism says "God is part love AND part hate". I choose with my free will to accept scripture instead of Calvinism.
You do realize as a believer in the doctrines of grace like this, the tares cannot turn into wheat.
I don't believe such a thing either.

To be planted by the Lord is to be blessed with saving grace.
And the promise of God is they will bear good fruit in their season.


The tares are not uprooted and replanted as wheat,
And the parable is speaking of the final judgment too, so this parable is from the divine perspective of God at the end.

Our perspective as believers is we are taken out of the world by God through Christ and will not share the sudden destruction of this world and go to hellfire. From our human POV we made choices to believe and follow Christ, but the underlying realty is God made all things work together for good to them that love Him and to them that are the called of Jesus Christ. And He was at work in us to bring us to Christ as He chose us for salvation.

We were like the tares, but we were not the tares.
************************
Psalm 1

1 Blessed is the man
Who walks not in the counsel of the [a]ungodly,
Nor stands in the path of sinners,
Nor sits in the seat of the scornful;
2 But his delight is in the law of the Lord,
And in His law he [b]meditates day and night.

3 He shall be like a tree
Planted by the [c]rivers of water,
That brings forth its fruit in its season,
Whose leaf also shall not wither;
And whatever he does shall prosper.


4 The ungodly are not so,
But are like the chaff which the wind drives away.
5 Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment,
Nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous.


6 For the Lord knows the way of the righteous,
But the way of the ungodly shall perish.


***********************
2 Thess 2


13 But we are [f]bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through [g]sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth, 14 to which He called you by our gospel, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word or our [h]epistle.

16 Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and our God and Father, who has loved us and given us everlasting consolation and good hope by grace, 17 comfort your hearts and [i]establish you in every good word and work.

***********************

Now this is something the unbelieving cannot claim for themselves, that God is their Father

John 8:42
Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me.

1 John 3
Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of [a]God! Therefore the world does not know [b]us, because it did not know Him. 2 Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. 3 And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.

****************

I hope people believe in the scriptures, especially the ones that teach us of our salvation. They are important, God wants us to know why things are what they are.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You do realize as a believer in the doctrines of grace like this, the tares cannot turn into wheat.
I don't believe such a thing either.

To be planted by the Lord is to be blessed with saving grace.
And the promise of God is they will bear good fruit in their season.


The tares are not uprooted and replanted as wheat,
And the parable is speaking of the final judgment too, so this parable is from the divine perspective of God at the end.
I have said the same thing myself several times. That is the way to look at the parable. The wheat represent the children of the kingdom and the tares represent the children of the devil (Matthew 13:38-39). So, if we look at things in real-time instead of God's eternal perspective, we know that all children of the kingdom were formerly children of the devil because in 1 John 3:8-10, children of the devil are described as lost sinners in general. So, it's important to look at the parable from the right perspective or else we would include that children of the devil can never become children of the kingdom even though, in reality, all children of the kingdom were children of the devil before being saved.

Our perspective as believers is we are taken out of the world by God through Christ and will not share the sudden destruction of this world and go to hellfire. From our human POV we made choices to believe and follow Christ, but the underlying realty is God made all things work together for good to them that love Him and to them that are the called of Jesus Christ. And He was at work in us to bring us to Christ as He chose us for salvation.
Yes, I agree, but where we disagree is that I believe a person who originally made that choice to believe and follow Christ is responsible to continue to choose to believe and follow Christ every day until the end of their lives. That's why we see warnings like the following given to believers...

Hebrews 3:12 See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14 We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.

Passages like this show the important of growing in the faith each day and the importance of having fellowship with other believers so that we can encourage each other in the faith so that none of us develop "a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God". We are responsible to "hold our original conviction firmly to the very end".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Downey

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Turn the other cheek, brother. No sense in getting too worked up.
Don't worry about it. I'm speaking the language that he understands. He said "if you would start actually using your brain, that would be awesome". Why are you not saying anything to him? He clearly is fine with talking that way, so he should not have a problem with someone talking to him that way. But, if he does, then he should think about how he was talking to me and whether or not he should have worded things the way he did.
 
Last edited:

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,879
5,421
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
I have said the same thing myself several times. That is the way to look at the parable. The wheat represent the children of the kingdom and the tares represent the children of the devil (Matthew 13:38-39). So, if we look at things in real-time instead of God's eternal perspective, we know that all children of the kingdom were formerly children of the devil because in 1 John 3:8-10, children of the devil are described as lost sinners in general. So, it's important to look at the parable from the right perspective or else we would include that children of the devil can never become children of the kingdom even though, in reality, all children of the kingdom were children of the devil before being saved.


Yes, I agree, but where we disagree is that I believe a person who originally made that choice to believe and follow Christ is responsible to continue to choose to believe and follow Christ every day until the end of their lives. That's why we see warnings like the following given to believers...

Hebrews 3:12 See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14 We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.

Passages like this show the important of growing in the faith each day and the importance of having fellowship with other believers so that we can encourage each other in the faith so that none of us develop "a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God". We are responsible to "hold our original conviction firmly to the very end".
I actually agree with you on persevering in faith.

Example
Hebrews 3

Therefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our confession, Christ Jesus, 2 who was faithful to Him who appointed Him, as Moses also was faithful in all His house. 3 For this One has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as He who built the house has more honor than the house. 4 For every house is built by someone, but He who built all things is God. 5 And Moses indeed was faithful in all His house as a servant, for a testimony of those things which would be spoken afterward, 6 but Christ as a Son over His own house, whose house we are if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope [a]firm to the end.

My understanding is the sheep believe and follow Christ, and He gives them eternal life and they will never perish, and that not all confessors in Christ, Church members, or others who claim that name for themselves are actually genuinely saved. Paul warns of false brethren who tear up the sheep. I wont comment on who is not one of His, I don't know what the end of their life will be.

Jesus knows His own. His sheep continue on in faith firm until the end.


Matthew 7:15
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.

John 10:14
I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own.

John 10:15
As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep.

John 10:27
My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.

For me, Judas the betrayer, was not one of His sheep, even though he had a part in the ministry. He was a false brethren, and was also a thief who stole from their purse.
2 Corinthians 11:26
in journeys often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of my own countrymen, in perils of the Gentiles, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
11,981
4,823
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I actually agree with you on persevering in faith.

Example
Hebrews 3

Therefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our confession, Christ Jesus, 2 who was faithful to Him who appointed Him, as Moses also was faithful in all His house. 3 For this One has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as He who built the house has more honor than the house. 4 For every house is built by someone, but He who built all things is God. 5 And Moses indeed was faithful in all His house as a servant, for a testimony of those things which would be spoken afterward, 6 but Christ as a Son over His own house, whose house we are if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope [a]firm to the end.

My understanding is the sheep believe and follow Christ, and He gives them eternal life and they will never perish, and that not all confessors in Christ, Church members, or others who claim that name for themselves are actually genuinely saved. Paul warns of false brethren who tear up the sheep. I wont comment on who is not one of His, I don't know what the end of their life will be.

Jesus knows His own. His sheep continue on in faith firm until the end.


Matthew 7:15
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.

John 10:14
I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own.

John 10:15
As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep.

John 10:27
My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.

For me, Judas the betrayer, was not one of His sheep, even though he had a part in the ministry. He was a false brethren, and was also a thief who stole from their purse.
2 Corinthians 11:26
in journeys often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of my own countrymen, in perils of the Gentiles, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;
Thanks for sharing your opinion, but I see passages like John 15:1-6, Hebrews 3:12-14, Hebrews 6:4-6, Hebrews 10:26-27 and Romans 11:20-22 as warnings given to believers about the need to continue to keep their confidence and trust in Christ until the end of their lives and there is no indication that it is automatic that they will do so.

That's why you see in a passage like Hebrews 3:12-14 the call to "exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin". We need to continue to trust in Christ and one way to help do that is by encouraging each other to stay strong in the faith. If we don't do things like that to help strengthen our faith or keep our faith strong then that passage warns that we could "be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin" and end up "departing from the living God". With that said, the author of Hebrews (Paul, IMO) did not think that would happen to his readers (Hebrews 6:9), but that doesn't mean it can't happen. In my view, the reason Paul scolded the immature "babes in Christ" in the church in Corinth so sharply (1 Corinthians 3:1-3) is because he knew what can happen if we don't "hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end".