You are so focused on critiquing Seventh Day Adventism, you are deaf to what I'm saying. Read again my post on a previous page regarding 3 spiritual laws that govern life. It's basically a summary of the gospel as portrayed by Paul in Romans 8.
You question that we should find the need to teach obedience to God's commandments. You ask this because again, you aren't reading my posts. What do you see when you read Exodus 20? Commandments...or promises? If you see promises, then you will understand more fully the gospel.
I have only mentioned Adventism once! I am discussing with you the TC, they do not solely concern your church.
I am discussing with you, your point that in order for a person to prove their righteousness they will obey the TC.
In other words, a person is not righteous by obeying the TC, but they can only be in a righteous state if they do obey them.
That law is an inflexible law, no wiggle room for error: Thou shalt NOT. Perfectly obey the TC or stand guilty before them. We all stand guilty before that law!
I have five decades of experience of this.
Firstly, people who continually state you must obey the TC do not relate those commands to what goes on, on the inside of man, not in my experience anyway.. So, they are watering them down. If they did not, they would not be so keen to keep reiterating you must obey the TC.
I can testify that people who do continually state you must obey the TC do not have the conviction of sin I and others do.
If a person must obey the TC in order to prove they have righteousness before God, it is the same as saying, according to the bible, you must obey the law which is the letter that kills, the ministration of death and condemnation in order for it to be shown you have righteousness before God.
In my experience, and I have decades of it, I have not met one person who kept stressing you must obey the TC who knew the pristine level they are set at.
I was raised in a church with that mindset. I could recite word for word Rom7:7-11 KJV as my testimony of my time in that church. Paul wrote half the books of the new testament, he can be relied upon concerning this subject. He was an expert in the law. So why would I have the exact same testimony as Paul concerning this subject? He knew the pristine level the law was set at, and I can only say, I appear to have more conviction of where it is set at than those who continually stress you must obey the TC.
Applicable law is within me, under the core terms of the new covenant. I cannot hide from that law or be in ignorance of it, it amazes so many can. As to which one of us better understands the gospel, where Paul's core message is concerned, I am convinced it is me