Am I the only one who gets the sense that the rules are constantly in flux?You don't have to be Christian to be saved.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Am I the only one who gets the sense that the rules are constantly in flux?You don't have to be Christian to be saved.
Really?Now Paul also wrote that Jesus will not return for the Church until after there has been a falling away from the truth (apostasy) - 2 Thessalonians 2:3 UASV:
(3) Let no one deceive you in any way, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction,
A large part of that apostasy is the teaching of the Trinity, teaching a new Gospel different from what the Apostles taught. Paul warned, Galatians 1:6-9 WEB:
RivenAm I the only one who gets the sense that the rules are constantly in flux?![]()
Would you agree that obedience to the teaching of Jesus and the apostles is necessary to be a Christian?
I agree. One doesn't have to believe in the trinity to be saved....in fact I bet a number high in the 90% range of new christians don't even know what the trinity even is. I would also say many get saved without realizing Jesus is God come in the flesh.It's a similar question, but I started this thread to discuss whether or not a person must believe in the Trinity in order to be a Christian. As I wrote in the opening post:
I think they're logical.Riven
They shouldn't be in flux.
They've been the same for 2 thousand years.
THIS is precisely why they cannot be changed.
It would mean that there are no rules!
What did you think of my list of tenets?
It's not MY list, it's what the Christian religion considers necessary for the faith.
I'd say so.I think they're logical.
Talking animals not withstanding.I'd say so.
The Christian RELIGION is very logical.
You know Riven...we are not required to accept the OT as literal in every sense.Talking animals not withstanding.
![]()
Oh, I know. But if you don't take all of it literally, then are there stories in the NT that we shouldn't take literally?You know Riven...we are not required to accept the OT as literal in every sense.
The walls of Jericho came tumbling down...but did it happen all at once?
Sodom and Gemorrah were destroyed,,,but did it happen exactly like that?
This does not mean the OT is not true...
It has poetry...
it has people retelling stories that they heard.
I like to use the NT for any teaching...we can be sure that the NT is history...
although the OT is history too.
The other day I placed some cream cheese on the counter top, covered, with a knife across it.
I heard a noise after a few minutes and I found the cheese and knife on the kitchen floor.
That could easily have turned into a ghost story.
Seems the knife might have been heavy on one side and it eventually pulled everything down.
Then again maybe it was a ghost.
Then again,,,maybe the donkey did talk.
God could do what He wants to do.
But I still like to stick to the NT.
No sir.Oh, I know. But if you don't take all of it literally, then are there stories in the NT that we shouldn't take literally?