You are so slick man. Might I say slithery slick. All that diatribe to avoid the fact that the C church has remove the verses 4-5 from Exodus and 8-9 from Deu. 5.And this is precisely the kind of stupid, uninformed anti-Catholic remark I'm here to expose.
Time for another Bible lesson . . .
In Exodus 20, where we first see the list of Commandments, we read in verses 3 and 5 that this is not simply a commandment against the making of statues and images. It is clearly talking about not making gods out of them and not bowing to them and serving them. The Church has always condemned this practice as well.
If this were a Commandment against the creation of images and statues, then God would have violated His own law by commanding Moses just a few chapters later to create 2 golden images of Cherubim to place atop the Ark (Exod. 25:18-22).
His supposed hypocrisy would have also extended to commanding Moses later on to create a bronze serpent and place it on a pole so that those who looked upon it would be healed (Num. 21:8-9). We also read other examples of God being pleased with the creation of statues (I Kings 6:23-28, 9:3). When we read those verses in context, we see that God’s prohibition is against making idols to worship and not the creation of images. This is ALL covered in the Catholic rendering of the first Commandment about having “other gods”.
Exodus 34:28 tells us that there are “Ten” commandments, even though Bible doesn’t number them. As a matter of fact, if you were to count all of the “You shall nots” alongside the other two that command the keeping of the Sabbath and honoring your father and mother – you would wind up with at least thirteen. Numbering them depends on exactly which “You shall nots” you group together and which ones you leave separate.
Protestants commonly split up the first Commandment into two and combine the last two into one, where we see a prohibition against the coveting of your neighbor’s wife and of ––his property. Women and property are NOT the same thing. Gal. 3:26-28 tells us that there is NO difference among those belong to Christ:
“For through faith you are all children of God in Christ Jesus. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free person, there is not male and female; for you are all ONE in Christ Jesus.”
In Deuteronomy 5, we see another version of the list. Here, we see a clear distinction between a man’s wife and his property. A different word for the desire of a man’s property is used than that of the desire for his wife.
Chamad (תחמד), is used to describe the coveting a man’s wife as opposed to 'Avah (תתאוה), which is used to describe the desire for a man’s property. Chamad has a connotation of sexual desire and lust, whereas, ‘Avah means to crave or to be greedy for something material.
We now see that there are two different Commandments here and not one jumbled, all-inclusive commandment. We must remember that in Gen. 2:24, God declared that, in the union between a husband and wife, the two become ONE flesh. Jesus reiterates this fact in Mark 10:8.
Nobody "changed" anything.
You can't get around it with your silly explanation of the numbering game, the total "thou shalts", the splitting of property versus wife, ect. Nice smoke screen. The fact remains the verses are NOT there and you know it.
And that is what opened the door for the C church to introduce all the idols, and statues and pictures that the C people bow down to, pray to, and worship. Just look around the world, there are tons of communities and villages that have the madonna as there object of worship or some patron saint. They parade in the streets carrying her overhead. You walk into the church and she is plastered everywhere more than Christ Himself.
Seriously you need to stop drinking the kool-ade.