Shooting yes not much truth.. and you said you where not a bully, so sad.I'm here to shoot down lies and present the Truth.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Shooting yes not much truth.. and you said you where not a bully, so sad.I'm here to shoot down lies and present the Truth.
um, that is just a quote from Scripture bro, that i saw you were also not acknowledging. Rom 14, James 4...one other that i can't think of right nowThis is moral relativism.
Sin is sin - no matter HOW much you try to rationalize it.
ha ya, you looove the Hegelian Dialectic, huh, imo you better go learn what that means lol. You are excluding yourself and you don't even know it. But tbh as short as your time is i'd be working on that anger at being forgiven you got goin on there bro. peaceNo need to apologize to me. I'm IN the Church established by Christ and His Apostles.
It's YOU and the rest of Protestantism who chose to follow men in the 16th century and beyond.
whenever someone tells you they have the truth, it means they are lying, and are trying to convince themselves, not you.Shooting yes not much truth.. and you said you where not a bully, so sad.
Not "angry" at all. I've never been on this forum.ha ya, you looove the Hegelian Dialectic, huh, imo you better go learn what that means lol. You are excluding yourself and you don't even know it. But tbh as short as your time is i'd be working on that anger at being forgiven you got goin on there bro. peace
No - it wasn't a quote from Scripture. The Bible doesn't teach that "a sin for you may not be a sin for me" or any other moral relativism.um, that is just a quote from Scripture bro, that i saw you were also not acknowledging. Rom 14, James 4...one other that i can't think of right now
interesting though, i never knew Catholics had tossed this too. Paul's "all things to all ppl," that gone too?
To be a bully, one must be stronger than the victim.Shooting yes not much truth.. and you said you where not a bully, so sad.
are you just psychologically incapable of addressing a point, BoL?No - it wasn't a quote from Scripture. The Bible doesn't teach that "a sin for you may not be a sin for me" or any other moral relativism.
Don't you EVER tire of being proven wrong??
k, just puttin you back on functional ignore, where you belong too buddy. hope you get some help soonNot "angry" at all. I've never been on this forum.
Just puttin' lies and you who tell them in their place . . .
If a 20 year old picks up a knife and throws it at his wife, he is likely to be charged at least with attempted murder. A two year old picking up the same knife and throwing it at the same person will likely not even be charged with a crime. The guilt or innocence for the same action does depend on where that person is with God and what is in that person's heart. God can always see what is in a person's heart and acts accordingly. Only justice there, God's justice:No - it wasn't a quote from Scripture. The Bible doesn't teach that "a sin for you may not be a sin for me" or any other moral relativism.
Don't you EVER tire of being proven wrong??
Apparently, you didn't understand what Paul was saying in Rom. 14:23. this is the danger of cherry-picking verses.are you just psychologically incapable of addressing a point, BoL?
yes, that was a quote from Scripture, and you can deny it until you die, still won't make it not a quote from Scripture bro
But whoever doubts stands condemned if he eats
implies--at least to grownups--that whoever does not doubt is not condemned, and once again sorry about your luck there.
It is actually even explained, for the hard of hearing, dunno if that is still in DRB or not tho.
I don't understand why you just don't abandon the Bible, and follow your heart, rather than trying to pretend you are a Christian, isn't exactly like they are on the upswing or anything lol. peace
implies--at least to grownups--that whoever does not doubt is not condemned, and once again sorry about your luck there.
It is actually even explained, for the hard of hearing, dunno if that is still in DRB or not tho.
I don't understand why you just don't abandon the Bible, and follow your heart, rather than trying to pretend you are a Christian, isn't exactly like they are on the upswing or anything lol. peace
If a person picks up a knife in anger and throws it at somebody - they are NOT doing the "same" thing as somebody who accidentally throws a knife in another person's directionIf a 20 year old picks up a knife and throws it at his wife, he is likely to charged at least with attempted murder. A two year old picking up the same knife and throwing it at the same person will likely not even be charged with a crime. The guilt or innocence for the same action does depend on where that person is with God and what is in that person's heart. God can always see what is in a person's heart and acts accordingly. Only justice there, God's justice:
"Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts." Prov 21:2
Doesn't matter.k, just puttin you back on functional ignore, where you belong too buddy. hope you get some help soon
A two year can be angry and can react in a wrong way. It does not have to be an accidental thing. The child may not realize or appreciate the danger, but this does not mean that the child's intention was not evil. It means that an adult would or should overlook it and try to teach the child to better.If a person picks up a knife in anger and throws it at somebody - they are NOT doing the "same" thing as somebody who accidentally throws a knife in another person's direction
Without the same intent - it its NOT the same action.
Punching your wife in the face in anger is NOT the same thing as accidentally hitting her in the fact while trying to save her from falling off a cliff.
It's silly for you to think that it is . . .
And the eyes to see require that special eyesalve [Rev 3:18] where would you get them? But should it not such eyes be seeing rather how to to avoid the things opposed to God rather than to any church?Doesn't matter.
I will still expose lies against the Catholic Church when I see'em.
An infant doesn't have the moral capacity to sin, nor do they have control of their facultie..A two year can be angry and can react in a wrong way. It does not have to be an accidental thing. The child may not realize or appreciate the danger, but this does not mean that the child's intention was not evil. It means that an adult would or should overlook it and try to teach the child to better.
People are in different places in their walk with God or their lack thereof. God knows all of these things and as well as every little shade of meaning and purpose in each of us and He always acts or reacts fairly based on complete and accurate knowledge. This is not really the moral relativism of which you speak. Such moral relativism would be a carnal man thing.
Men do not know all things. Not even one individual knows everything about himself. Some of what men think they know is erroneous.
God, on the other hand, knows everything about everyone of us. His judgments are in accord with that knowledge and therefore are not always precisely the same for situations our carnal minds might deem to be the same. Unlike the judgments of men, God's judgments are always completely fair.
No, you religion has no case, but God has the strongest case against mens religions including yours.To be a bully, one must be stronger than the victim.
Are you saying that because we Catholics have a stronger case, that I am a "bully"??
Thanks.
Are you really so without understanding? I am praying for you.An infant doesn't have the moral capacity to sin, nor do they have control of their facultie..
To imply that they do is silly.
yes, in the case presented they are both "eating meat" BoLPaul emphatically states that the one who DOUBTS is condemned - so the 2 people aren't doing the "same" thing.
who said anything about the RCC?Doesn't matter.
I will still expose lies against the Catholic Church when I see'em.