Helen
Well-Known Member
- Oct 22, 2011
- 15,471
- 21,160
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Canada
gee, who saw that coming
offended, i guess?
Very doubtful.
But "escorted out of the door" I would guess.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
gee, who saw that coming
offended, i guess?
ah sorry, i meant Forrest's posts to him?Then my friend......... you have obviously not read many of his posts in the many other different threads !!
ah sorry, i meant Forrest's posts to him?
Thank you for a simple answer. If the answer to my question is, both, why would you break them into two?
Absolutely! But that doesn't change a thing about God, does it, whether it is the way I believe or the way you believe.A statement can be made about you and me as adults, as humans, as people from Earth. Those statements would apply "to both of us" - but that does not make us "the same person".
BobRyan said: ↑
A statement can be made about you and me as adults, as humans, as people from Earth. Those statements would apply "to both of us" - but that does not make us "the same person".
Absolutely! But that doesn't change a thing about God, does it, whether it is the way I believe or the way you believe.
My point is that it is an unproveable thing by someone on one side to someone on the other side. God alone gives the increase. He may use men to do it, but not simply because a man decides it needs to be proven. Only because God sees the need.It changes the point so that you cannot argue "they are the same person" if some attribute that they both have is the same.
Shared attribute does not mean "same person" -- never has... never will
I have no problem with what you said, but it does not establish that God consists of more than One entity or an entity of more than one part or person, and so forth.
So there is no reason to decide that God consists of multiple parts rather than only one...[or two if Jesus is considered to be God].
If it was not God's will to believe in the Trinity He would not have provided that truth in Scripture. Perhaps it is not your will to believe in the Trinity, but there are more than enough Scriptures to establish that doctrine through Scripture.Is not God's will more important than ours? Why would it be His will for us to believe in a Trinity?
My point is that it is an unproveable thing by someone on one side to someone on the other side. .
What is it that God wants us to believe and why? Isn't that important? Is not God's will more important than ours? Why would it be His will for us to believe in a Trinity?
I agree that it is a doctrine of many followers of Christ, but I would not call it essential as it is not essential to me and I am a follower of Christ. My walk with the Lord is as close to 24/7 as I am able and as I allow and as God provides I approach more closely. This is not a new thing with me. The kingdom of God and His righteousness have been first with me for many years. The trinity has never been essential to me even when I gave it passing approval. That approval was given before I had ever read the Bible for myself well over 40 years ago.If it was not God's will to believe in the Trinity He would not have provided that truth in Scripture. Perhaps it is not your will to believe in the Trinity, but there are more than enough Scriptures to establish that doctrine through Scripture.
That it is an ESSENTIAL DOCTRINE for Christians is revealed in the words of the Risen Christ.
I don't and never have directly attacked the trinity doctrine. I simply don't believe it. No man has ever given me reason to do so and neither had God convicted me of the need. Do not we live for God by faith rather than by knowledge? I follow what I believe rather than the dictates of men who are not God.As far back as the 4th century (or even earlier) there were attacks on the Trinity, and Athanasius spelled out this doctrine very clearly:
“Whoever desires to be saved should above all hold to the catholic faith. Anyone who does not keep it whole and unbroken will doubtless perish eternally. Now this is the catholic faith: That we worship one God in trinity and the trinity in unity, neither blending their persons nor dividing their essence. For the person of the Father is a distinct person, the person of the Son is another, and that of the Holy Spirit still another. But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal.
What quality the Father has, the Son has, and the Holy Spirit has. The Father is uncreated, the Son is uncreated, the Holy Spirit is uncreated. The Father is immeasurable, the Son is immeasurable, the Holy Spirit is immeasurable. The Father is eternal, the Son is eternal, the Holy Spirit is eternal. And yet there are not three eternal beings; there is but one eternal being.
So too there are not three uncreated or immeasurable beings; there is but one uncreated and immeasurable being. Similarly, the Father is almighty, the Son is almighty, the Holy Spirit is almighty. Yet there are not three almighty beings; there is but one almighty being.
Thus the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God. Yet there are not three gods; there is but one God. Thus the Father is Lord, the Son is Lord, the Holy Spirit is Lord. Yet there are not three lords; there is but one Lord. Just as Christian truth compels us to confess each person individually as both God and Lord, so catholic religion forbids us to say that there are three gods or lords.
The Father was neither made nor created nor begotten from anyone. The Son was neither made nor created; he was begotten from the Father alone. The Holy Spirit was neither made nor created nor begotten; he proceeds from the Father and the Son. Accordingly there is one Father, not three fathers; there is one Son, not three sons; there is one Holy Spirit, not three holy spirits. Nothing in this trinity is before or after, nothing is greater or smaller; in their entirety the three persons are coeternal and coequal with each other.
So in everything, as was said earlier, we must worship their trinity in their unity and their unity in their trinity. Anyone then who desires to be saved should think thus about the trinity. But it is necessary for eternal salvation that one also believe in the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ faithfully..."
But do all have the "eyes to see" and the "ears to hear" of which Jesus spoke? Logic and reason alone will not give access to truth. The truth comes to us through the Holy Ghost which in us is the "eyes" and the "ears":On the contrary - logic and reason still exist.
And we can all read.
Why would the supposed personhood be important to anyone? To me it seems we would be better to spend our time on the reasons why Jesus came and what He brought to people. What did Jesus say to the powers of religion of his day?Hence the OP regarding - the Bible support for the personhood and Deity of the Holy Spirit.
The details of which you speak are only obvious because men have elevated them and said they were important. Jesus never said belief in a trinity was important. As to His Word, what is that? Is it not what God writes in our hearts by the Holy Ghost?He gave us His Word -- our job is to "believe it" and accept such obvious details as we find listed there.
My point is that it is an unproveable thing by someone on one side to someone on the other side. .
What is it that God wants us to believe and why? Isn't that important? Is not God's will more important than ours? Why would it be His will for us to believe in a Trinity?
But do all have the "eyes to see" and the "ears to hear" of which Jesus spoke? Logic and reason alone will not give access to truth. The truth comes to us through the Holy Ghost which in us is the "eyes" and the "ears":
Why would the supposed personhood be important to anyone?
To me it seems we would be better to spend our time on the reasons why Jesus came and what He brought to people.
Jesus never said belief in a trinity was important. As to His Word, what is that?
This thread is about the Bible support for the personhood and Deity of the Holy Spirit.
John 16
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;
10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;
11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.
12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
15 All thin 7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are onegs that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
Matthew 28
19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
1 John 5
7 For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one
Matt 12
31 “Therefore I say to you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven men. 32 Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.
Acts 15
28 For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things: 29 that you abstain from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled,
Rom 8
16 The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,
Acts 13
2 As they ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy Spirit said, “Now separate to Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” 3 Then, having fasted and prayed, and laid hands on them, they sent them away.
Heb 3
7 Therefore, as the Holy Spirit says:
“Today, if you will hear His voice,
8 Do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion,
In the day of trial in the wilderness,
9 Where your fathers tested Me, tried Me,
And saw My works forty years.
10 Therefore I was angry with that generation,
In connection with the John 17:7,8 , the New Catholic Encyclopedia (Vol. 13, pp. 575, 576) observes: “So clearly does St. John see in the Spirit a person who takes Christ’s place in the Church, that he uses a masculine pronoun [e·keiʹnos] in reference to the Spirit even though [pneuʹma, spirit] is neuter in gender (Joh 16.8, 13-16). Consequently, it is evident that St. John thought of the Holy Spirit as a Person, who is distinct from the Father and the Son, and who, with the glorified Son and the Father, is present and active in the faithful (Joh 14.16; 15.26; 16.7).”
But did John really use the masculine pronoun despite the neuter gender of the word “spirit”? Was his purpose to show that the spirit is indeed a person? Why not reread the above quotation from John chapter 16? What is the antecedent of the pronoun “he”? Is it not the word “Comforter”? Yes, and the Greek word so rendered is pa·raʹkle·tos and is masculine in gender. Rightly, then, John used masculine pronouns in this passage because grammatical usage required it.
I believe His Word and I accept any obvious details provided by God. What is obvious to me may not be obvious to you and vice versa.He gave us His Word -- our job is to "believe it" and accept such obvious details as we find listed there.
The choices are the Lord or mammon... not whether to read or not. Some people who choose the Lord are completely illiterate in the languages of men.Everyone has free will. We can all "Choose not to see" though it is right there for us to read.
This personhood of God is not written in my heart. In my heart is where God writes His Word to me. The Word of God matters to me. I read the Bible daily and sometimes God brings it alive to me. When He does not, where is the Word of God? When Jesus was dead on the cross before he resurrected, where was the Word of God?It would matter if the Word of God mattered to them. It is information God has conveyed to us in His Word.
Do you suppose that I have not read those chapters prayerfully many times? Do you suppose that I even respond to you for my own glory? You continue to ignore the important things for little things which even if they were correctly believed would not save anyone.Hint - John 16 and Matthew 12 are "the teaching of Jesus" on the Holy Spirit.
I read the entire Bible every year in three languages. This is only the reading. I also study. When I don't understand something or am in doubt I ask the Lord for help on it. Sometimes it's necessary to lay aside such questions for the moment, but there are no teachings that I prefer not to read or pursue. I don't look for as you say "a better Bible". I look for whatever God may have for me from the scriptures and from whatever other place He chooses to use to "increase me" in Him.But your response is "problematic" in that you seem to be hoping for "a better Bible" one that does not include the teachings of Jesus and other Bible writers that you prefer not to read. Have you thought that through??
amadeus said: ↑
Jesus never said belief in a trinity was important. As to His Word, what is that?
Yes my lack of belief in the trinity is my concern. You call it a problem, but I do not. So long as I am seeking first His kingdom and His righteousness what will I be lacking of importance?That's your problem.
Your idea that Jesus gave us license to ignore any part of His Word, His teaching that we did not judge to fit our preferences -- is shot through with holes. You know that right?