The concept is stronger when you look at it in John 5:24 (kjv).
well, i'd suggest that is a completely different subject and is likely being misinterpreted too, but i guess these also work to an extent on a logical level, ya. That one i don't think is even
translated right tbh, but the point still gets across i guess. But the syntax is wrong, i can tell some Anglo scribe has been at it
ok, for instance "there is now no condemnation in those who are in" well
all sins are forgiven, even Hitler's, so the pov that "we" is some special group that is being respected for our beliefs is a fail, which i guess you don't much wanna hear but there it is
They also, basically sit in Moses' seat, as I interpret it.
so then, if you reject kings amen; your choices are anarchy or chaos, and these are also often conflated.
fwiw i am a committed anarchist, telling you that imo you must obey the law
The fact that we are forgiven of our sins also means that we will not be condemned at the Great White Throne Judgment (
Revelation 20:11-15) because our names are written in the Lamb's Book of Life; because our sins are forgiven (
Romans 4:6-8).
the prob there is likely who you are IDing as being "we" there, along with some other logical assumptions that may turn out to not be correct, for instance you now envision some
future Courtroom Scenario at this GWT judgement perhaps, or prolly God sitting on this throne, judging people, etc, and these do not hold up to a holistic view of Scripture imo
What misstatements? (I am always open to correction).
ha well, any, see, any mis-statement would have been punishable by death, even saying "
before Abraham was, I AM" was a stoning offense--not a crucifying one, btw, big clue there--all of the oracles in here would be dead long time ago, etc, simply for the way in which their statements are put
Thanks I forgot.
Won't be long until I think it means "What a dumb response" again.
see, there is no offense in this, regardless of whether i like it or not, an opinion is plainly being expressed, thank God for ppl who disagree, etc
Like I originally meant impaho to mean in my personal and humble opinion, but someone thought that I was coming across more as saying, in my perfect and honest opinion lol.
imho is generally understood as 'in my humble opinion,' although forrest might have a gratuitous alt for that too, dunno lol