Angels

[bbyrd009]

Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

ya, not interested in playing Duelling Scriptures with you, ty

Well thanks, I didn't know that T.D. Jakes believed in Modalism, I got to check this out.

trust me, you will love the guy, he is Cult of Sol too

 

[101G]

Jesus Only/Oneness Pentecostalism/Modalism and T. D. Jakes

What are the beliefs of Jesus only / oneness Pentecostals?

Jesus Only Cult

I went to the potters house web page, and viewed their belief statement . The Potter's House Church Belief Statement

you might want to check it out

 

[101G]

ya, not interested in playing Duelling Scriptures with a stone deaf woman, ty
trust me, you will love the guy, he is Cult of Sol too

how do you know that he is, and or a cult?

 

[bbyrd009]

how do you know that he is, and or a cult?

bc he runs and hides in a crack when the cross comes too, 101, i mean do you need to see it again?

 

[101G]

bc he runs and hides in a crack when the cross comes too, 101, i mean do you need to see it again?

Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

 

[bbyrd009]

Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

well 101, pointing out that i believe you are cursed would be different from not getting a reply to a pertinent Scriptural argument?

i only meant to say that i have gone around with TD the same as with many believers here, only the "debate" never ended bc he either could not or would not answer my questions, and just kind of abandoned the field. Seemed like a quite decent guy though, for a raging determinist; but i mean better get ready to hear how the cow ate the cabbage if you get me lol

 

[101G]

bc he either could not or would not answer my questions

what was your questions that he avoided?. not that I could answer them, just curious to the nature of your questions.

 

[bbyrd009]

what was your questions that he avoided?. not that I could answer them, just curious to the nature of your questions.

oh, the same Qs that never get answered here 101, that i have put to you even, it's really just a parlor trick that can be played on any determinist, i don't know any secrets except maybe a few of the open ones, like anyone else. Hegelians rely on facts, which are not truth, and Scripture reveals truth and not facts, as determinists are wont to believe.

Not to put you on the spot here if you are not inclined, but if you are, just go back in your feed to the last time we talked, to that post that you overlooked, or ignored, or did not reply to, that had a question in it. And understand that i would not know the answer either prolly, lol

 

[101G]

oh, the same Qs that never get answered here 101, that i have put to you even, it's really just a parlor trick that can be played on any determinist, i don't know any secrets except maybe a few of the open ones, like anyone else. Hegelians rely on facts, which are not truth, and Scripture reveals truth and not facts, as determinists are wont to believe.

Not to put you on the spot here if you are not inclined, but if you are, just go back in your feed to the last time we talked, to that post that you overlooked, or ignored, or did not reply to, that had a question in it

First thanks for your response.

second, I was not aware of any question you put to me that I didn't address, plese post the Topic, and post #.

thanks.

 

[bbyrd009]

First thanks for your response.

second, I was not aware of any question you put to me that I didn't address, plese post the Topic, and post #.

thanks.

at this point prolly better to let it develop organically again, it will soon enough i guess

 

[101G]

at this point prolly better to let it develop organically again, it will soon enough i guess

when do, tell me directly, ok......

 

[bbyrd009]

when do, tell me directly, ok......

ok too late for today, but tomorrow i will find a good spot, meaning that i will post a reply to one of your comments tomorrow/asap
God willing

 

[Enoch111]

see, the trinity is nothing but modalism in "reverse" .... what a GREAT deception...... LOL. oh well.

There's nothing like someone trying to deceive themselves by playing semantic games. Are you your father, and is your father you? If not, then get real and believe Scripture.

 

[101G]

There's nothing like someone trying to deceive themselves by playing semantic games. Are you your father, and is your father you? If not, then get real and believe Scripture.

one scripture to answer your question,
Matt 19:26 But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

see Enoch111, with you and I, (men) it's impossible, but not with God.......

now to prove my point on your question that you asked, take the Revelation 1:1 test, since we're talking about angels.

Read Revelation 1:1 first. the question, "who sent his "angel" to John?"

A. was it the One whom you calls the "Father", or
B. was it the one whom you calls the "Son".

but before you answer, Read Revelation 22:6 first, for the angel who was sent tells us exactly who sent him.

I'll be looking for your answer, thanks in advance.

 

[101G]

GINOLJC, to all.

Well I see the Revelation 1:1 test question is not answered. so I'll Give the answer, it was JESUS who sent "his" angel to John who is the Lord God of the holy prophets, according to Rev 22:6.

which means, JESUS is the "ONE TRUE" God of the OT as well as the NT. and the Lord JESUS hinself confirm this, read Rev 22:16 and he will tell you himself.

 

[CoreIssue]

GINOLJC, to all.

Well I see the Revelation 1:1 test question is not answered. so I'll Give the answer, it was JESUS who sent "his" angel to John who is the Lord God of the holy prophets, according to Rev 22:6.

which means, JESUS is the "ONE TRUE" God of the OT as well as the NT. and the Lord JESUS hinself confirm this, read Rev 22:16 and he will tell you himself.

Jesus is the name of the flesh the second person of the Trinity took on at the incarnation. It did not exist in the OT, but the second of the person of the Trinity most assuredly did.

All the descendents of David are his offspring, regardless of how many generations down the line they are.

So your argument is false. Jesus is not the name of God nor did Jesus exist in the OT.

 

[101G]

it's good to answer after the test, but I still give you a chance to answer. read Revelation 1:1 again and read Rev 22:6 and tell us who is the Lord God of the holy prophets, which the angel who was sent said, your answer please.

 

[CoreIssue]

it's good to answer after the test, but I still give you a chance to answer. read Revelation 1:1 again and read Rev 22:6 and tell us who is the Lord God of the holy prophets, which the angel who was sent said, your answer please.

I already answered.

 

[101G]

I already answered.

so are you saying that the Lord God of the holy Prophets is the Lord Jesus correct?...... (smile).

 

[101G]

Jesus is the name of the flesh the second person of the Trinity took on at the incarnation. It did not exist in the OT, but the second of the person of the Trinity most assuredly did

well, well, well, since you said, "I already answered". the scriptures don't agree with your assessment. for the angel in rev 22: said, "the Lord God of the holy prophets" sent him. who are the holy prophets here, beside the NT? answer,
2Pet 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pet 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

Oh, those holy prophets who was in the OT. and the one who sent the angel, he said it was the one is the Lord God of these "holy prophets". hmmmmmm, seems like the bible is not agreeing with your assessment of the scriptures.

as the apostle Peter said, "it's better to OBEY God than men"....... so I'll believe the scriptures instead of what you said.

be blessed.............