So, one God/Lord?God is one spiritual essence having three persons of the same essence. Called Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Or, three Gods/Lords?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So, one God/Lord?God is one spiritual essence having three persons of the same essence. Called Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
All three persons of the Trinity are fully God. The Father is repeatedly called God (1Co 8:6; 1Pt 1:3). Paul writes, “Blessed is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Eph 1:3). The Son is called God on numerous occasions (Jn 1:1; Rm 9:5; Ti 2:13–15; Heb 1:8; 2Pt 1:1). For instance, Thomas boldly calls Jesus, “My Lord and my God” (Jn 20:28). Finally, in the inception of the church, Ananias and Sapphira dropped dead after lying to the Holy Spirit since they had “not lied to people but to God” (Acts 5:1–4).So, one God/Lord?
Or, three Gods/Lords?
The creeds are part of Church History.
And you should not neglect this study.
We always depend on theose who are more learned than we are.
That's why people go to church.
“God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.”” (John 4:24) (HCSB)
So, three Gods/Lords; or three Persons called God/Lord...am I correct in saying this is your assessment?All three persons of the Trinity are fully God. The Father is repeatedly called God (1Co 8:6; 1Pt 1:3). Paul writes, “Blessed is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Eph 1:3). The Son is called God on numerous occasions (Jn 1:1; Rm 9:5; Ti 2:13–15; Heb 1:8; 2Pt 1:1). For instance, Thomas boldly calls Jesus, “My Lord and my God” (Jn 20:28). Finally, in the inception of the church, Ananias and Sapphira dropped dead after lying to the Holy Spirit since they had “not lied to people but to God” (Acts 5:1–4).
Tim Barnett. (n.d.). What Is the Trinity?.
Is ignorance a virtue?
amadeus said: ↑
Did you not read where I said that I had read them?
@Dave L has the tendency to ignore things like that so that he can make blanket condemning statements to people over things that he doesn't understand.
Absolutely not...he has given absolutely no Bible and has not defined the Trinity as he understands it to any of us with any kind of biblical support...he sits in judgment of the biblical understanding others have given and refuses to show forth what is the understanding of the Trinity that he believes God has given him...Is @Dave L really doing that?
Aren't you being somewhat severe?Absolutely not...he has given absolutely no Bible and has not defined the Trinity as he understands it to any of us...he sits in judgment of the biblical understanding others have given and refuses to show forth what is the understanding of the Trinity that he believes God has given him...
He stands aloof judging the doctrine of others but will not declare what he believes is the truth of the matter, so that his own doctrine might be likewise judged...this is dissimulation.
Yes, but is history to be avoided?
Not really...the man has judged my salvation and has also accused me of having the spirit of antichrist....which is an impossibility because if we do what it takes to obtain a fish from the Lord, He is not going to give us a serpent; and if we do what it takes to receive an egg, He will not give us a scorpion. And Act 2:38, Act 2:39 sets forth a conditional promise wherein if we fulfill the condition the Holy Ghost is absolutely promised...so God did not give me the spirit of antichrist when I did what it takes to receive the Holy Ghost, now, did He?Aren't you being somewhat severe?
Perhaps according to your definition of Christianity, as I certainly don't follow the Christianity defined by many people by they way they practice it. By definition I don't mean 'dictionary wise' but 'action wise' according to the example Jesus set when he walked on planet Earth about 2,000 years ago.Why are you more like Islam in your idea about God than Christianity?
first thanks for the reply, second, lets see what the bible say.(Word, Son)...that you objected to:
John 1
[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
[14] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
First thanks for the reply, second,It is both the same Spirit, and it is a distinct Spirit from the 1st.
How, you ask...
The Father inhabiteth eternity; but He became a Man, who died and gave up His Spirit back to the One who inhabiteth eternity.
The One who inhabiteth eternity dwells throughout eternity and cannot vacate it, even in descending to become a Man. This is the Father, the 1st Person of the Trinity, the one Spirit.
thanks for the reply, but I must disagree with your disagrement, and here's why. man cannot lift a finger if it was not for God, supportive scripture,Disagree. God is the author, men do the writing.
first thanks for the reply, second, lets see what the bible say.
Hebrews 1:3 "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high".
now, are you going to believe God own word, or man word?
PICJAG.
and here's why.thanks for the reply, but I must disagree with your disagreement
man cannot lift a finger if it was not for God,
Okay, that is fine you disagree with ^ THAT.
But those are YOUR WORDS, NOT MINE.
I said no such thing.
see taken, you can't get out of bed in the morningds unless God allows it. you and I have NO POWER, if God withdraw his Spirit from us we fall down as rag dolls.
You are deflecting from what I DID SAY, and expounding on what YOU SAID, and then DISAGREED WITH.
I SAID God is the AUTHOR, men do the writing...
Men DO the Writing by and through the direction and AUTHORITY of God Himself.
Scriptural Support...FOR WHAT "I" actually SAID....(not what you said "implying it was my words)
Heb 12
[2] Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith;
EX 17
[14] And the LORD said unto Moses, Write ..
Num 5
[23] And the priest shall write ...
Jer 36
[27] Then the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, after that the king had burned the roll, and the words which Baruch wrote at the mouth of Jeremiah, saying,
[28] Take thee again another roll, and write in it all the former words that were in the first roll, which Jehoiakim the king of Judah hath burned.
[32}Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words.
so I cannot agree with your assessment.
Well I do not agree with your implication that what YOU SAID, had anything remotely to do with What I said.
Your disagreement is with what YOU said.
Glory to God,
Taken
The Creator does not BECOME the Created.